Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 408, Issue 12, pp 3213–3222 | Cite as

Development of a passive sampler based on a polymer inclusion membrane for total ammonia monitoring in freshwaters

  • M. Inês G. S. Almeida
  • Adélia M. L. Silva
  • Rhys A. Coleman
  • Vincent J. Pettigrove
  • Robert W. Cattrall
  • Spas D. KolevEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

A passive sampler for determining the time-weighted average total ammonia (i.e. molecular ammonia and the ammonium cation) concentration (C TWA) in freshwaters, which incorporated a polymer inclusion membrane (PIM) as a semi-permeable barrier separating the aqueous source solution from the receiving solution (i.e. 0.8 mol L−1 HCl), was developed for the first time. The PIM was composed of dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid (DNNS) as a carrier, poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) as a base polymer and 1-tetradecanol as a modifier. Its optimal composition was found to be 35 wt% commercial DNNS, 55 wt% PVC and 10 wt% 1-tetradecanol. The effect of environmental variables such as the water matrix, pH and temperature were also studied using synthetic freshwaters. The passive sampler was calibrated under laboratory conditions using synthetic freshwaters and exhibited a linear response within the concentration range 0.59–2.8 mg L−1 NH4 + (0.46–2.1 mg N L−1) at 20 °C. The performance of the sampler was further investigated under field conditions over 7 days. A strong correlation between spot sampling and passive sampling was achieved, thus providing a proof-of-concept for the passive sampler for reliably measuring the C TWA of total ammonia in freshwaters, which can be used as an indicator in tracking sources of faecal contamination in stormwater drains.

Graphical Abstract

Cross section of a passive sampler (amplified membrane thickness) with a schematic representation of the transport mechanism for total ammonia across the dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid (DNNS)-based polymer inclusion membrane (PIM). Black solid arrows illustrate the extraction process. Grey solid arrows illustrate the back-extraction process

Keywords

Passive sampling Polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs) Dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid (DNNS) Total ammonia Freshwater Faecal contamination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Australian Research Council and Melbourne Water Corporation for providing funding for this research (Linkage Project 110200595); the Brazilian National Research Council for providing a 12-month Postdoctoral Fellowship to Adélia Maria Lima da Silva (Process N.236607/2012-0, Science without Borders Program); Mr. Les Gamel for making the glass devices; Mr. Daniel MacMahon (Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management) for assistance with the field application of the passive samplers; and Mr. Sam Ludbrook (Chemiplas Australia) for providing DNNS from King Industries.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Namiesnik J, Zabiegala B, Kot-Wasik A, Partyka M, Wasik A. Passive sampling and/or extraction techniques in environmental analysis: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005;381:279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vrana B, Mills GA, Allan IJ, Dominiak E, Svensson K, Knutsson J, et al. Passive sampling techniques for monitoring pollutants in water. Trends Anal Chem. 2005;24:845–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zabiegala B, Kot-Wasik A, Urbanowicz M, Namiesnik J. Passive sampling as a tool for obtaining reliable analytical information in environmental quality monitoring. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;396:273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Esteve-Turrillas FA, Yusa V, Pastor A, de la Guardia M. New perspectives in the use of semipermeable membrane devices as passive samplers. Talanta. 2008;74:443–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harman C, Allan IJ, Vermeirssen ELM. Calibration and use of the polar organic chemical integrative sampler—a critical review. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012;31:2724–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davison W, Zhang H. Progress in understanding the use of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT)—back to basics. Environ Chem. 2012;9:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahkola H, Herve S, Knuutinen J. Overview of passive Chemcatcher sampling with SPE pretreatment suitable for the analysis of NPEOs and NPs. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20:1207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stuer-Lauridsen F. Review of passive accumulation devices for monitoring organic micropollutants in the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut. 2005;136:503–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kot-Wasik A, Zabiegala B, Namiesnik J. Passive sampling for long-term monitoring of organic pollutants in water. Trends Anal Chem. 2000;19:446–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    US Environmental Protection Agency. Aquatic life ambient water quality criteria for ammonia—freshwater. Washington: US EPA Office of Water; 2013. EPA 822-R-13-001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ANZECC (2000) Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. vol 1. Canberra: Environment Australia.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Batley G, Simpson S. Development of guidelines for ammonia in estuarine and marine water systems. Mar Pollut Bull. 2009;58:1472–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Almeida MIGS, Chan C, Pettigrove VJ, Cattrall RW, Kolev SD. Development of a passive sampler for zinc(II) in urban pond waters using a polymer inclusion membrane. Environ Pollut. 2014;193:233–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolev SD, Almeida MIGS, Cattrall RW. Polymer inclusion membranes. In: Pabby AK, Rizvi SSH, Sastre AM, editors. Handbook of membrane separations: chemical, pharmaceutical, food and biotechnological applications. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Almeida MIGS, Cattrall RW, Kolev SD. Recent trends in extraction and transport of metal ions using polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs). J Membr Sci. 2012;415–416:9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nghiem LD, Mornane P, Potter ID, Perera JM, Cattrall RW, Kolev SD. Extraction and transport of metal ions and small organic compounds using polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs). J Membr Sci. 2006;281:7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Almeida MIGS, Silva AML, Cattrall RW, Kolev SD. A study of the ammonium ion extraction properties of polymer inclusion membranes containing commercial dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid. J Membr Sci. 2015;478:155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang LJ, Cardwell TJ, Cattrall RW, de Castro MDL, Kolev SD. Pervaporation-flow injection determination of ammonia in the presence of surfactants. Anal Chim Acta. 2000;416:177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Molins Legua C, Meseguer Lloret S, Moliner Martinez Y, Campíns Falcó P. A guide for selecting the most appropriate method for ammonium determination in water analysis. Trends Anal Chem. 2006;25:282–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nitrogen (Ammonia)-Automated Phenate Method. In: Rice EW, Bridgewater L, editors. Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater. 22 ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation; (2012).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith EJ, Davison W, Hamilton-Taylor J. Methods for preparing synthetic freshwaters. Water Res. 2002;36:1286–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gray SM, Ellis PS, Grace MR, McKelvie ID. Spectrophotometric determination of ammonia in estuarine waters by hybrid reagent-injection gas-diffusion flow analysis. Spectr Lett. 2006;39:737–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thurston RV, Russo RC, Emerson K. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium—tabulation of percent un-ionized ammonia. Minnesota: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory; 1979.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garcia-Rodríguez A, Fontàs C, Matamoros V, Almeida MIGS, Cattrall RW, Kolev SD. Development of a polymer inclusion membrane-based passive sampler for monitoring of sulfamethoxazole in natural waters. Minimizing the effect of the flow pattern of the aquatic system. Microchem J. 2016;124:175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Inês G. S. Almeida
    • 1
  • Adélia M. L. Silva
    • 2
  • Rhys A. Coleman
    • 3
  • Vincent J. Pettigrove
    • 3
    • 4
  • Robert W. Cattrall
    • 1
  • Spas D. Kolev
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management (CAPIM), School of ChemistryThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, Coordenação de Química, Escola de Ciências Exatas e da ComputaçãoGoiâniaBrazil
  3. 3.Melbourne Water CorporationMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management (CAPIM), School of BiosciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations