Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In ovo sexing of chicken eggs by fluorescence spectroscopy

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Culling of day-old male chicks in production of laying hen strains involves several millions of animals every year worldwide and is ethically controversial. In an attempt to provide an alternative, optical spectroscopy was investigated to determine nondestructively in ovo the sex of early embryos of the domestic chicken. The extraembryonic blood circulation system was accessed by producing a window in the egg shell and the flowing blood was illuminated with a near-infrared laser. The strong fluorescence and the weak Raman signals were acquired and spectroscopically analyzed between 800 and 1000 nm. The increase of fluorescence intensity between 3.5 and 11.5 days of incubation was found to be in agreement with the erythropoietic stages, thus enabling to identify hemoglobin as fluorescence source. Sex-related differences in the fluorescence spectrum were found at day 3.5, and principal component (PC) analysis showed that the blood of males was characterized by a specific fluorescence band located at ∼910 nm. Supervised classification of the PC scores enabled the determination of the sex of 380 eggs at day 3.5 of incubation with a correct rate up to 93% by combining the information derived from both fluorescence and Raman scattering.

The fluorescence of blood obtained in ovo by illumination of embryonic vessels with a IR laser displays spectral differences that can be employed for sexing of eggs in early stage of incubation, before onset of embryo sensitivity and without hindering its development into a healthy chick

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turner J. Animal reproduction, human control. In: Bekoff M, editor. Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. 2nd ed. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC; 2010. p. 30–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tierschutz-Schlachtverordnung - TierSchlV (BGBl. I S. 2982). 20-12-2012.

  3. Bruijnis MRN, Blok V, Stassen EN, Gremmen HGJ. Moral “Lock-In” in responsible innovation: the ethical and social aspects of killing day-old chicks and its alternatives. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2015;28(5):939–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harz M, Krause M, Bartels T, Cramer K, Rosch P, Popp J. Minimal invasive gender determination of birds by means of UV-resonance Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2008;80(4):1080–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steiner G, Bartels T, Krautwald-Junghanns ME, Boos A, Koch E. Sexing of turkey poults by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;396(1):465–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steiner G, Preusse G, Zimmerer C, Krautwald-Junghanns ME, Sablinskas V, Fuhrmann H, et al. Label free molecular sexing of monomorphic birds using infrared spectroscopic imaging. Talanta. 2016;150:155–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Steiner G, Bartels T, Stelling A, Krautwald-Junghanns ME, Fuhrmann H, Sablinskas V, et al. Gender determination of fertilized unincubated chicken eggs by infrared spectroscopic imaging. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;400(9):2775–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tran HT, Ferrell W, Butt TR. An estrogen sensor for poultry sex sorting. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(4):1358–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Phelps P, Bhutada A, Bryan S, Chalker A, Ferrell B, Neuman S, et al. Automated identification of male layer chicks prior to hatch. World Poult Sci J. 2003;59(1):33–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weissmann A, Reitemeier S, Hahn A, Gottschalk J, Einspanier A. Sexing domestic chicken before hatch: a new method for in ovo gender identification. Theriogenology. 2013;80(3):199–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clinton M, Haines L, Belloir B, McBride D. Sexing chick embryos: a rapid and simple protocol. Br Poult Sci. 2001;42(1):134–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen T, Mace M, Durrant B. Sexing of mid-incubation avian embryos as a management tool for zoological breeding programs. Zoo Biol. 2012;31(6):694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Porat N, Bogdanov K, Danielli A, Arie A, Samina I, Hadani A. Direct detection of chicken genomic DNA for gender determination by thymine-DNA glycosylase. Br Poult Sci. 2011;52(1):58–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yilmaz-Dikmen B, Dikmen S. A morphometric method of sexing white layer eggs. Braz J Poult Sci. 2013;15(3):203–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Webster B, Hayes W, Pike TW. Avian egg odour encodes information on embryo sex, fertility and development. Plos One. 2015;10(1):e0116345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galli R, Preusse G, Uckermann O, Bartels T, Krautwald-Junghanns ME, Koch E, et al. In ovo sexing of domestic chicken eggs by Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2016;88:8657–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wei D, Chen S, Liu Q. Review of fluorescence suppression techniques in Raman spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2015;50(5):387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gosnell ME, Anwer AG, Mahbub SB, Menon PS, Inglis DW, Adhikary PP, et al. Quantitative non-invasive cell characterisation and discrimination based on multispectral autofluorescence features. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rudbeck L, Dissing J. Rapid, simple alkaline extraction of human genomic DNA from whole blood, buccal epithelial cells, semen and forensic stains for PCR. Biotechniques. 1998;25(4):588–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS. Touchdown PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(14):4008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol. 1999;30(1):116–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schart C. Thesis: Entwiklung einer Steuerung für die Fokussierung und das Tracking embryionaler Blutgefäße im Hühnerei. Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden. 2015.

  23. Baumann R, Meuer HJ. Blood-oxygen transport in the early avian embryo. Physiol Rev. 1992;72(4):941–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheng G. Primitive and definitive erythropoiesis in the yolk sac: a bird’s eye view. Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54(6–7):1033–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnston P. Hematocrit values for the chick embryo at various ages. Am J Physiol. 1955;180(2):361–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Campbell GL, Weintraub H, Mayhall BH, Holtzer H. Primitive erythropoiesis in chick embryogenesis. 2. Correlation between Hemoglobin Synthesis and the Mitotic History. J Cell Physiol. 1971;50(3):669–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Berezin MY, Achilefu S. Fluorescence lifetime measurements and biological imaging. Chem Rev. 2010;110(5):2641–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirsch RE. Heme-protein fluorescence. In: Lakowicz JR, editor. Topics in fluorescence spectroscopy, Vol. 6 Protein Fluorescence. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. p. 221–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Chaiken J, Finney WF, Yang X, Knudson PE, Peterson K, Weinstock RS, et al. Progress in the noninvasive, in vivo, tissue modulated Raman spectroscopy of human blood. P SPIE. 2001;4254:216–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chaiken J, Goodisman J, Deng B, Bussjager RJ, Shaheen G. Simultaneous, noninvasive observation of elastic scattering, fluorescence and inelastic scattering as a monitor of blood flow and hematocrit in human fingertip capillary beds. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14(5):050505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee JY, Ji HS, Lee SJ. Micro-PIV measurements of blood flow in extraembryonic blood vessels of chicken embryos. Physiol Meas. 2007;28(10):1149–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tagirov M, Golovan S. Sexual dimorphism in the early embryogenesis of the chicken (Gallus Gallus domesticus). Mol Reprod Dev. 2015;82(5):332–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Morita VS, Boleli IC, Cargnelutti A. Hematological values and body, heart and liver weights of male and female broiler embryos of young and old breeder eggs. Braz J Poultry Sci. 2009;11(1):7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Abdi H, Williams LJ. Principal component analysis. WIREs Comput Stat. 2010;2(4):433–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bonnier F, Byrne HJ. Understanding the molecular information contained in principal component analysis of vibrational spectra of biological systems. Analyst. 2012;137(2):322–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Talari ACS, Movasaghi Z, Rehman S, Rehman I. Raman spectroscopy of biological tissues. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2015;50(1):46–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bankapur A, Zachariah E, Chidangil S, Valiathan M, Mathur D. Raman tweezers spectroscopy of live, single red and white blood cells. Plos One. 2010;5(4):e10427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cuadros MA, Coltey P, Carmen NM, Martin C. Demonstration of a phagocytic cell system belonging to the hemopoietic lineage and originating from the yolk sac in the early avian embryo. Development. 1992;115(1):157–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McIntyre BA, Alev C, Tarui H, Jakt LM, Sheng G. Expression profiling of circulating non-red blood cells in embryonic blood. BMC Dev Biol. 2008;8:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brereton RG, Lloyd GR. Support vector machines for classification and regression. Analyst. 2010;135(2):230–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol. 1951;88(1):49–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Speksnijder G, Ivarie R. A modified method of shell windowing for producing somatic or germline chimeras in fertilized chicken eggs. Poult Sci. 2000;79(10):1430–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fineman RM, Schoenwolf GC, Huff M, Davis PL. Causes of windowing-induced dysmorphogenesis (neural tube defects and early amnion deficit spectrum) in chicken embryos. Am J Med Genet. 1986;25(3):489–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kaleta EF, Redmann T. Approaches to determine the sex prior to and after incubation of chicken eggs and of day-old chicks. World Poult Sci J. 2008;64(3):391–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Aleksandrowicz E, Herr I. Ethical euthanasia and short-term anesthesia of the chick embryo. Altex-Altern Tierexp. 2015;32(2):143–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Andrea Büchner for performing molecular genetic analyses and Lohmann Tierzucht GmbH (Cuxhaven, Germany) for providing eggs. Special thanks to Prof. Rudolf Preisinger and Dr. Anke Förster (Lohmann Tierzucht GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) for the insightful discussions about hatchery practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensoring and Monitoring, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    Roberta Galli, Grit Preusse, Edmund Koch & Gerald Steiner

  2. Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Neurosurgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    Ortrud Uckermann

  3. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Birds and Reptiles, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 17, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Thomas Bartels & Maria-Elisabeth Krautwald-Junghanns

  4. Faculty of Physics, Vilnius University, Sauletekio av. 9 bl. 3, 10222, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Gerald Steiner

Authors
  1. Roberta Galli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grit Preusse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ortrud Uckermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas Bartels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria-Elisabeth Krautwald-Junghanns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Edmund Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gerald Steiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Roberta Galli or Gerald Steiner.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Consumer Protection (BMELV) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE), grant no. 511–06.01-28-1-33.010-07.

Conflict of interest

Patent applications for in ovo sexing with the methods described in this paper are pending.

Additional information

Dedicated to Professor Reiner Salzer on the occasion of his 75th birthday. Professor Reiner Salzer is an internationally recognized leader in analytical chemistry and pioneered spectroscopic methods.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galli, R., Preusse, G., Uckermann, O. et al. In ovo sexing of chicken eggs by fluorescence spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 409, 1185–1194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-0116-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-0116-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation