Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 409, Issue 5, pp 1185–1194 | Cite as

In ovo sexing of chicken eggs by fluorescence spectroscopy

  • Roberta Galli
  • Grit Preusse
  • Ortrud Uckermann
  • Thomas Bartels
  • Maria-Elisabeth Krautwald-Junghanns
  • Edmund Koch
  • Gerald Steiner
Research Paper


Culling of day-old male chicks in production of laying hen strains involves several millions of animals every year worldwide and is ethically controversial. In an attempt to provide an alternative, optical spectroscopy was investigated to determine nondestructively in ovo the sex of early embryos of the domestic chicken. The extraembryonic blood circulation system was accessed by producing a window in the egg shell and the flowing blood was illuminated with a near-infrared laser. The strong fluorescence and the weak Raman signals were acquired and spectroscopically analyzed between 800 and 1000 nm. The increase of fluorescence intensity between 3.5 and 11.5 days of incubation was found to be in agreement with the erythropoietic stages, thus enabling to identify hemoglobin as fluorescence source. Sex-related differences in the fluorescence spectrum were found at day 3.5, and principal component (PC) analysis showed that the blood of males was characterized by a specific fluorescence band located at ∼910 nm. Supervised classification of the PC scores enabled the determination of the sex of 380 eggs at day 3.5 of incubation with a correct rate up to 93% by combining the information derived from both fluorescence and Raman scattering.

Graphical abstract

The fluorescence of blood obtained in ovo by illumination of embryonic vessels with a IR laser displays spectral differences that can be employed for sexing of eggs in early stage of incubation, before onset of embryo sensitivity and without hindering its development into a healthy chick


Optical spectroscopy Fluorescence Raman scattering Chicken embryo Sexing In ovo 


The possibility to determine the sex of birds “in ovo” is driving increasing attention as a potential method to overcome the culling of day-old male chicks in poultry industry. Laying hen strains of modern breeding differ from broiler strains, so that male birds of the laying strain are not profitable for meat production. Therefore, day-old cockerels are culled directly in the hatchery. This practice involves a very large number of animals: approximately 370 million in North America and 420 million in Europe every year [1]. Only in Germany, 40 millions of chicks are killed every year according to animal welfare legislation by asphyxiation with carbon dioxide or by grinding [2]. Killing of day-old chicks is considered as problematic and ethical issues have triggered increasing research aimed to provide alternatives [3].

The optical spectrum contains information about the biochemical composition and/or the structure of a biological sample and can provide the information about the sex as well. Vibrational spectroscopic techniques have been applied to the sexing of birds, either of hatched birds as well as of incubated and unincubated eggs. UV resonance Raman spectroscopy [4] and Fourier-transform infrared absorption spectroscopy [5, 6] were used to retrieve the sex of hatched animals based on DNA differences by analyzing cell material extracted from the feather pulp. The use of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy was also reported earlier by our group for sex recognition based on the spectrum of germinal cells obtained from unincubated eggs [7].

Optical methods for in ovo sexing have the advantage of being applicable in situ without taking samples, and can provide real-time sexing by eliminating the need to wait for the results of chemical or genetic analyses performed on previously extracted samples. Therefore, optical methods have clear advantages toward an industrial exploitation when compared to other non-destructive approaches proposed for in ovo sexing that are based on measurement of hormone [8, 9, 10] and DNA analysis [11, 12, 13], which all require the extraction of egg material or fluids. Totally non-invasive methods, like the selection of unincubated chicken eggs based on morphometric parameters, can only bias to a low extent the ratio between sexes [14]. There is also evidence that egg odor encodes sex information; however, this was not exploited for sexing [15].

We recently reported near-infrared Raman spectroscopy for in ovo sexing of incubated chicken eggs, showing that it provides correct sexing up to 90% without hindering embryo development [16]. We demonstrated that, already during the fourth day of incubation (i.e., 84 ± 4 h), Raman measurements can be performed directly on the blood that flows in the extraembryonic vessels of the vitelline circulation avoiding all damage to the embryo. The Raman spectra delivered the biochemical fingerprint of the embryonic blood, from which the sex information was obtained by use of supervised classification algorithms. In this study, we observed that the fluorescence background intensity was significantly different between sexes, but this information was not exploited because of the very high overlap between sexes.

In Raman spectroscopy, the presence of an intense fluorescence background is normally considered a pitfall rather than a source of information and thus suppressed or removed during data processing [17]. Fluorescence spectra of biological tissue are broad compared with Raman and FT-IR spectra, and they do not carry such detailed biochemical information. However, spectral fluorescence-based methods have continuously evolved and improved enabling to address new cellular features [18].

Here, we show that spectral analysis of the near-infrared fluorescence signal of the blood flowing in the extraembryonic vessels can indeed provide sex information of the domestic chicken eggs (Gallus gallus f. dom.). For this purpose, we analyzed spectroscopically the backscattered radiation of blood illuminated with a 785 nm laser, repeating the measurements at different time points of the incubation and comparing with the time course of erythropoiesis to identify the source of the fluorescence signal. Afterwards, we exploited the fluorescence spectral profile for sex determination and compared the results with the combination of fluorescence and Raman scattering.


Egg handling

Fertilized eggs of a white layer strain (LSL—Lohmann Selected Leghorn) were used in all experiments. They were obtained from Lohmann Tierzucht GmbH (Cuxhaven, Germany). The freshly laid eggs were inspected for any shell damage and then stored at approximately 14 °C. Immediately before starting the incubation, egg shells were windowed using a 30 W CO2 laser (Firestar v30, Synrad, Mukilteo, Washington, USA) equipped with scanning head (FH Flyer, Synrad, Mukilteo, Washington, USA). The shells were laser-scribed at the pointed end along a round path of 12 mm diameter, without removing the shell window. The incubation was performed in an automatic egg incubator (Favorit Olymp 192, Heka-Brutgeräte, Rietberg, Germany) at 37.8 °C and humidity of 53%, in vertical position with the pointed end downward. A ±45° tilting at an interval of 3 h was applied during the incubation time until day 3.5 (i.e., 84 h). At this time point, the eggs were subjected to the measurement.

The shell window was gently removed using a scalpel and the spectrum was acquired. After measurement, embryonic tissue samples were isolated for subsequent molecular sexing, or the shell windows were closed using a biocompatible adhesive tape (Leukosilk, BNS Medical GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) and further incubated to perform time-course experiments. Measurements were repeated at day 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, 9.5, and 11.5. At each time, the tape was removed before the measurement and reapplied afterwards. The incubation between the measurements was performed with the egg in upright position to maintain the embryo and the main blood vessels optically accessible. Before measurement, the eggs were inspected and the spectrum was acquired only on blood vessels of vital embryos. Otherwise, samples of embryonic tissue were isolated and kept frozen at −80 °C for subsequent sex determination. After the last measurement at day 11.5, all embryos were isolated and kept frozen for sex determination as well.

Molecular sexing

Reference sexing was obtained with genetic analysis on embryonic tissue based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Alkaline extraction of DNA was performed as described elsewhere [19]. The samples were treated in NaOH for 20 min at 75 °C and subsequently neutralized with Tris–HCl (pH = 7.5). Afterwards, the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm and the supernatants transferred to reaction tubes. The DNA content of the supernatant was measured using the Genesys 10 Bio UV–vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The amplification of the CHD-1 gene was performed in the PCR cycler T Gradient (Biometra GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). The primers and the temperature profile are described elsewhere [20, 21]. Finally, the amplified PCR products were separated by ethidium bromide agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by UV light.


Spectroscopy was performed with a spectrometer RamanRxn (Kaiser Optical Systems Inc., Ann Arbor, USA). The excitation was obtained with a diode laser emitting at a wavelength of 785 nm (Invictus 785-nm NIR, Kaiser Optical Systems Inc., Ann Arbor, USA). A fiber optic probe (MR-Probe-785, Kaiser Optical Systems Inc., Ann Arbor, USA) was used in the experiments. The excitation fiber had a core diameter of 62.5 μm and the collection fiber of 100 μm. The fiber probe was coupled to a self-build microscopy system that enabled coaxial vision. The microscopy system was composed by commercial elements and it is pictured in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Schema of the microscopy system with inset showing the egg shell window and the main vitelline vessels suited for in ovo spectroscopic measurement

A Keplerian telescopic system was used as beam-expander to collimate the laser beam and to match the diameter to the objective pupil. The beam-expander was connected to a 45° filter cube that contained a short-pass dichroic mirror with edge at 670 nm (FF670-SDi01, Semrock Inc., Rochester, New York, USA). The mirror reflected to 90° the laser excitation in the microscope objective ×20/0.4NA Plan Apo NIR (Mitutoyo Corp., Kanagawa, Japan), which was also mounted on the filter cube. The laser spot in the focus had a diameter of ∼55 μm and the measured laser power was 160 mW. The light was collected in reflection mode by the objective. The collected near-infrared light with wavelength above 670 nm was reflected by the dichroic mirror back to the fiber probe and propagated to the spectrograph. The collected visible light was transmitted through the dichroic mirror and used to obtain the image of the sample. For this purpose, a CCD camera with 50 mm focal length lens and a NIR hot mirror were mounted on the aperture of the filter cube that faces the objective. In order to maximize the visibility of perfused blood vessels, side illumination with green LEDs was employed. A motorized x-y-z micrometer stage was used to move the egg and bring a blood vessel in the laser spot. Blood vessels with diameter larger than 100 μm were manually chosen for the measurement. An autofocus system based on blood flow detection in the camera images was used to set the laser focus inside the blood vessel. A tracking system remained active during the whole acquisition to compensate all movements of the blood vessel. The autofocus and tracking software modules are described elsewhere [22]. An enclosure of the system provided rejection of ambient light and protection from reflected or scattered laser light during acquisition.

Total acquisition time was set to 40 s (20 accumulations of 2 s). The acquired spectral range was from 794 to 1054 nm (i.e., from 150 to 3250 rel. cm−1) and the spectral resolution was 0.3 nm (i.e., approximately 4 cm−1).

Data analyses

Spectroscopic data were analyzed using the MATLAB package (MathWorks Inc., Natick, USA) and statistics were calculated with Prism 6.0 (Graph Pad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

The intensity of the fluorescence was calculated as sum area under the spectra in the range 820–1000 nm. Principal component analysis was performed on the raw spectra by using the MATLAB function princomp. Classification was performed using supporting vector machine. The MATLAB functions svmtrain was employed to train the classifier, by using a quadratic kernel and least-square method to find the separating hyperplane. Afterwards, the function svmclassify was employed in order to retrieve the classification.

Results and discussion

Spectral analysis of blood fluorescence

In the chicken egg, blood islands appear toward the end of the first day of incubation and already at day 2 of incubation the blood circulation starts driven by the primitive heart. Between day 3 and 4, the vascularized area of the yolk sac is roughly circular and reaches a diameter between 3 and 4 cm at day 4. The major blood vessels are the paired lateral vitelline arteries and veins, and the unpaired anterior and posterior vitelline veins. The branching pattern of arteries and veins is dichotomous, creating a treelike topology. Around day 8, the respiratory function is transferred to the blood vessels of the newly formed chorioallantoic membrane [23]. When the egg is brought in vertical position at day 3.5 of incubation, the vascularized area moves on the top and, after opening of the shell window, it remains on the surface, so that the vessels can be optically sampled through the shell window (Fig. 1, inset). The position of measurement was always chosen on a large vessel (diameter larger than 100 μm), preferably in main lateral or anterior/posterior veins.

The backscattered signal generated upon irradiation of extraembryonic blood vessels with a laser beam at 785 nm was spectroscopically analyzed daily on a set of 27 eggs from 3.5 to 7.5 days of incubation, and then at 9.5 and 11.5 days. Six embryos died during the time course of experiments because of egg incubation in upright position without the required periodic tilting, repeated egg removal from the incubator, or opening of the shell window in order to perform the measurements. The mean spectra calculated for each day of measurement are shown in Fig. 2a. A weak Raman signal is superimposed on the strong fluorescence. The fluorescence intensity was calculated as area under the curves and is shown in Fig. 2b. The signal above 1000 nm (2740 rel. cm−1) was not included in the calculation as it is dominated by the Raman bands of CH and OH. The fluorescence increased with the incubation time until day 7.5 and tended to decrease afterwards.
Fig. 2

a Mean blood spectra acquired in ovo from day 3.5 until day 11.5 of incubation. b Time course of total blood fluorescence acquired in ovo in the range 820–1000 nm (mean ± SD). The number of eggs included in the statistics is indicated. c Spectra of plasma and erythrocytes (red blood cells—RBC) separated by centrifugation of embryonic chicken blood extracted at day 11.5 of incubation; the RBC spectrum was acquired using a twentieth of the laser power to avoid thermal damage

Different erythropoietic phases take place starting at day 2. The primitive erythrocytes undergo six rounds of mitosis until day 5. In the middle of day 5, the definitive erythrocytes start entering the circulation and gradually replace the primitive line by day 7. By day 8–9, the erythrocytes have completed their maturation [24]. The time course of fluorescence is in agreement with the time course of hematocrit observed during erythropoiesis [25], and mimics the increase of hemoglobin measured in embryonic and mature erythrocytes [26]. A linear increase of hemoglobin content was reported until day 5, followed by a plateau between day 5 and 6, corresponding to the transition from the proliferative to the post mitotic phase of primitive erythrocytes. This plateau can be seen also in the time course of fluorescence. Afterwards, the hemoglobin content increases again until day 9 and slightly decreases afterwards, when the erythrocyte maturation is concluded. Fluorescence intensity displays a similar trend at day 9.5 and 11.5 as well. The comparison between the time courses of fluorescence intensity and hemoglobin content indicates that hemoglobin is the main source of the observed NIR fluorescence.

Heme in red blood cells is a molecule that belongs to the family of porphyrin complexes. Porphyrins normally display strong reddish-orange fluorescence. However, heme constitutes an exception, as the fluorescence of the porphyrin ring is quenched by the coordinated iron [27]. Steady state fluorescence of heme in the UV range is nevertheless observed and attributed to fluctuations in the protein structure that partly neutralize the quenching. The source of steady state fluorescence is identified in the tryptophan residues [28]. Moreover, it was already shown in vitro that excitation at 785 nm of methemoglobin over the concentration range spanning the normal capillary blood range produces a fluorescence that increases linearly with increasing hemoglobin volume percent [29], although fluorescence detected in vivo was attributed to both plasma and hemoglobin [30].

In our experiments, the fluorescence was observed only during irradiation of blood (i.e., acquiring the signal from perfused blood vessels and from the heart chambers), while other embryonic tissue, egg components (egg white and yolk), as well as extraembryonic tissue (vitelline and corioallantoic membranes) did not display any fluorescence, but only Raman scattering. Moreover, blood taken from embryos at day 11.5 of incubation was centrifuged to separate erythrocytes from plasma and then the two components were subjected to spectroscopy. While the erythrocytes displayed strong fluorescence signal, plasma displayed Raman scattering only (Fig. 2c).

It is also worth to note that any bleaching of fluorescence during irradiation of perfused blood vessels is prevented by the blood flow itself. The blood flow velocity in the center of large vitelline vessels is around 1 mm/s already at early development stages [31], and therefore the exposure time of blood cells traveling through the laser spot is as short as 0.05 s.

The embryos were sexed by PCR and the time course of the fluorescence for both sexes was analyzed on a subset of eggs that survived until the end of experiments. The mean spectra for both sexes are shown in Fig. 3a from day 3.5 until day 11.5 on incubation. Male and female egg fluorescence exhibited the largest difference and lowest variability at day 3.5 (Fig. 3b). Starting at day 4.5, the intensity difference progressively declined. Male blood was characterized by more intense fluorescence until day 7.5. While the fluorescence intensity of female blood steadily increased with the incubation time, fluorescence intensity of male blood did not increase from day 3.5 to day 4.5. At this point of the incubation, the main changes in the fluorescence of male blood affected the spectral shape. After day 9.5 of incubation, the mean fluorescence intensities of both sexes became similar. Higher fluorescence of male blood at early incubation stages may be likely related to faster erythropoiesis in male embryos. It is known that in the first phases of incubation (∼30 h), male embryos display faster development [32]. Moreover, it was reported that at later incubation stages (after day 13), male embryos possess higher hematocrit [33]. Our data evidenced that developmental differences between sexes exist for the whole first third of incubation.
Fig. 3

a Mean blood spectra of male (blue) and female (red) embryos (n = 7 for each sex) acquired in ovo from day 3.5 until day 11.5 of incubation. b Intensity difference (male − female), mean and SD

The spectral differences between male and female blood fluorescence detected at day 3.5 may be used for in ovo sexing. We also have shown previously that at this time point, it is possible to measure in ovo without impairing embryo development [16].

In ovo sexing by means of fluorescence

In order to verify whether the differences between the fluorescence spectra of male and female blood at day 3.5 of incubation enable a reliable sexing of eggs, the measurements were performed on 380 fertilized eggs incubated until 84 ± 4 h. Reference PCR showed that 199 eggs contained a male and 181 eggs a female embryo. Figure 4a shows the mean spectra and the corresponding standard deviations. The spectral differences of the fluorescence between the sexes were confirmed, being the average intensity of fluorescence much stronger for males. However, there is overlap between the two groups. In Fig. 4b, the signal intensity calculated as area under the spectra in the range 820–1000 nm is shown for all measured eggs, together with the mean value and the standard deviation. It becomes evident from these data that the lower signal intensities are rather close for both sexes, while higher intensities are characteristics of males, with only one exception in the female group. This indicates that, although carrying sex information, the evaluation of the fluorescence intensity alone is not sufficient for sex recognition with high correct rate. Moreover, the intensity of males is affected by a larger variability compared to the one of females, as indicated by the larger standard deviation (SD).
Fig. 4

a Mean spectra of blood acquired from female and male eggs in the range 820–1000 nm; the overlapping range of SD is indicated in gray. b Total area intensity calculated in the same range as shown in (a) with mean value and SD

Principal component analysis was applied in order to gain insights in the different spectral contributions that are related to the sex. Mathematically, principal component analyses enables extraction of the most important information from the observation data table, by performing a procedure of linear decomposition and computing new variables called principal components (PC). The values of these new variables are called scores, and can be interpreted as the projections of the observations onto the PCs [34]. This approach allows discrimination among spectral groups using scatter plots of scores, and the loading vectors convey the spectral variations that differentiate the data [35].

Score intensities for the PC #1 to #8 are shown in Fig. 5a, and the corresponding loading vectors in Fig. 5b. The mean scores of PC #1, #2, #3, and #7 are significantly different between the sexes (two-tailed t test with Welch correction, p < 0.001). The first PC score is higher for males and accounts for the overall higher fluorescence intensity. The loading vector of PC #1 represents the mean spectrum and includes both fluorescence and Raman scattering signals. The higher components describe the “spectral” variance of the data. For instance, PC #2 accounts for a variance as high as 97.5%. The score is higher for males and the loading vector represents a fluorescence band which is typical of male blood. PC #3 accounts for a variance of 1.3%; the score is higher for females and accounts for differences in the Raman signal. The Raman bands of the loading vector indicate presence of proteins (at 1003, 1085, 1304, 1445, and 1665 rel. cm−1 [36]) and of nucleic acids (at 780 and 826 rel. cm−1 [36]), while bands of hemoglobin were not observed. Therefore, this component might be interpreted as blood cells different from erythrocytes. The overall spectrum appears very similar to the one reported for blood immune cells [37]. Although the immune system of the embryo is not yet developed, early presence at least of macrophages is known [38]. Moreover, hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells of myeloid and lymphoid lineages were found in the embryonic blood during the fourth day of incubation [39]. Therefore, the interpretation of this component remained tentative. PCs #4 and #5 account for a variance of 0.6 and 0.2%, respectively. Both loading vectors of PC #4 and PC #5 are dominated by Raman bands of unsaturated lipids at 1300, 1440, 1656, and 1748 rel. cm−1 [36]. For instance, the loading vector of PC #5 was found fully consistent with the Raman spectrum of yolk, which has been shown earlier [16]. This component likely accounts for sampling of egg material outside the blood vessel and is justified by the large laser spot and non-confocal microscope configuration that was used in the experiments. PCs #6 and #7 account for variances close to 0.1% and were interpreted as variations of the protein profile: the loading vector of PC #6 is characterized by bands typical of proteins with cyclic ring at 1003, 1210, 1545, and 1606 rel. cm−1, and the one of PC #7 by Raman bands of amide vibrations at 1225, 1563, and 1637 rel. cm−1 [36]. Finally, the loading vector of PC #8, which accounts for a variance lower than 0.1%, contains vibration bands of protein cyclic rings at 1210 and 1545 rel. cm−1 [36] and thus represents changes in the protein profile, too.
Fig. 5

a First eight PC scores; two-tailed t test with Welch correction, ***p < 0.001. b First eight PC loading vectors; the position of Raman bands discussed in the text is indicated in rel. cm−1

In order to test a classification for in ovo sexing based on PC scores, the dataset was randomly split in two groups, which were used as training set (n = 190) and test set (n = 190). The training set was used to create the classification model, while the test set was used to determine model performances. Supporting vector machine (SVM) was used as solution to the two-class (that is to say, sexes) problem. SVM creates a boundary in the form of a hyperplane between two groups that maximize the margin between the most similar samples in each group [40]. For instance, SVM was applied on the PC scores to find the quadratic hyperplane that separates the sexes of the training set. By using the scores of the first two PCs only—i.e., the fluorescence information alone (Fig. 6a)—the training set was reclassified with a correct rate of 81% (females 76/91, males 78/99), and the test set was classified with a correct rate of 85% (females 75/90, males 86/100). By including higher PCs, the correct rate of classification increased with the dimensionality (Fig. 6b), and the best performances were attained by using the first eight PCs. In this case, the training set was reclassified with a correct rate of 93% (females 85/91, males 91/99), and the test set was classified with a correct rate of 91% (females 81/90, males 91/100). By further increasing the dimensionality, the algorithm became overfitted: the classification rate of the training set further increased, while the one of the test set decreased.
Fig. 6

a Scatter plot of PC #2 vs. PC #1 scores and separating quadratic function found with supporting vector machine. b Classification rate as function of the dimensionality

The accuracy is limited by the variability of the data, which was likely related to intrinsic variability of blood composition. Both intensity and spectral shape of fluorescence depended from the development stage of the embryo. The measurements spanned over ∼8 h, and it is expected that developmental variations may occur in embryos even though all eggs are placed in the incubator at the same time. These differences exist inside the same setting of eggs depending from differences in the viability and vigor of embryos, size of individual eggs, or from local temperature gradients inside the incubation chamber [41]. Experimental effects related to different volume sampling due to blood vessel dimensions or variation of the focal position did not affect the classification. This is proven by lack of any correlation between the score of PC #5 (representative of yolk) and the misclassified spectra. The mean score intensity calculated for wrongly classified spectra is −0.002 ± 0.062 (mean ± SD, n = 31) vs. 0.002 ± 0.050 calculated for the correctly classified ones (mean ± SD, n = 349). The mean score intensities are not statistically different (two-tailed t test, p = 0.7).

Compared to our previous research, the present study provides significant improvements. We first proposed infrared absorption spectroscopy of the feather pulp to distinguish the sex of hatched birds [5, 6]. The studies were performed on a small number of animals (turkeys and pigeons), as pilot studies aimed to demonstrate that optical spectroscopic methods can retrieve sex-related biochemical differences in birds. Furthermore, we investigated infrared spectroscopy of the germinal disk extracted from unincubated chicken eggs [7]. Sexing was achieved with high accuracy, but the approach is not transferrable in the practice because windowing of unincubated eggs causes high occurrence of embryo mortality and morbidity [42, 43]. By analyzing the Raman spectra of embryonic blood, we achieved sex determination with an accuracy comprised between 88% and 90% [16]. Moreover, the use of NIR laser excitation avoided phototoxic effects on embryos, so that healthy chicks hatched from the measured eggs. Here, we retained the experimental configuration with NIR excitation in order to rule out negative effects on embryos, but all spectral features of the backscattered spectra were used for sexing, thus exploiting the sex information conveyed by fluorescence too, and increasing the correct classification rate well over 90%.

The exploitation of multiple information contained in the backscattered light might open new possibilities for improvement of in ovo sexing accuracy. Fluorescence intensity, fluorescence spectral shape, and Raman scattering encode sex-related information that are associated to different blood components. Several approaches of spectral preprocessing could be applied in order to “amplify” a specific feature and afterwards a multi-parameter classification strategy developed to better comply with intrinsic data variability, thus further increasing the sexing accuracy. Moreover, the exploitation of fluorescence may contribute to overcome some disadvantages associated with Raman spectroscopy of biological samples, as Raman scattering is a low-intensity process which requires highly efficient laser sources, low-noise detectors, effective Rayleigh filters, and high-throughput optics [19]. As fluorescence intensity is some orders of magnitude larger than the Raman scattering signal, it might enable to largely simplify the experimental setup and facilitate the future industrial deployment of optical techniques for in ovo sexing.


The results show that the sex information can be extracted from intensity and spectral shape of the near-infrared fluorescence of embryonic blood. Source of fluorescence was identified in the hemoglobin and the spectral features of fluorescence depend from the hematopoietic stage. The intrinsic variability of development stages affected the accuracy of sexing based exclusively on fluorescence. As the Raman scattering was simultaneously acquired with the fluorescence signal, it could be employed to further increase the sexing correct rate well over 90%, with a significant improvement compared to sex determination based on Raman spectra only.

The ideal criteria for sex determination have been defined since years and include lack of negative effects on embryo development and practicability on a large scale [44]. In ovo sexing based of spectral analysis of the backscattered radiation satisfies these requirements, as it is non-invasive, does not require extraction of egg material, and does not use consumables. Moreover, the method is applicable during the fourth day of incubation, before onset of embryo sensitivity at day 7 [45], thus in agreement with animal welfare.

The exploitation of fluorescence offers the potential to develop industrial systems for egg sexing that are not based on expensive spectrometers, but just make use of few light detectors with suited bandpass filters to measure the signal intensity in selected spectral ranges. Afterwards, the sex information may be retrieved with simple calculations, such as ratio of intensities in order to make the method robust toward variations of laser power and detection efficiency. The availability of a cheap and easier approach alternative to spectroscopy might contribute to a broader diffusion of optical sexing in the hatchery practice. On an international scale, development of a practicable technique for in ovo sex determination has the potential to contribute to the prevention of annual culling of 7 billion male layer hybrids, whose female siblings produce the current global demand of about 68.3 million tons of eggs per year.



The authors gratefully acknowledge Andrea Büchner for performing molecular genetic analyses and Lohmann Tierzucht GmbH (Cuxhaven, Germany) for providing eggs. Special thanks to Prof. Rudolf Preisinger and Dr. Anke Förster (Lohmann Tierzucht GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) for the insightful discussions about hatchery practice.

Compliance with ethical standards


This work was financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Consumer Protection (BMELV) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE), grant no. 511–06.01-28-1-33.010-07.

Conflict of interest

Patent applications for in ovo sexing with the methods described in this paper are pending.


  1. 1.
    Turner J. Animal reproduction, human control. In: Bekoff M, editor. Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. 2nd ed. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC; 2010. p. 30–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tierschutz-Schlachtverordnung - TierSchlV (BGBl. I S. 2982). 20-12-2012.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruijnis MRN, Blok V, Stassen EN, Gremmen HGJ. Moral “Lock-In” in responsible innovation: the ethical and social aspects of killing day-old chicks and its alternatives. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2015;28(5):939–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harz M, Krause M, Bartels T, Cramer K, Rosch P, Popp J. Minimal invasive gender determination of birds by means of UV-resonance Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2008;80(4):1080–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steiner G, Bartels T, Krautwald-Junghanns ME, Boos A, Koch E. Sexing of turkey poults by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;396(1):465–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steiner G, Preusse G, Zimmerer C, Krautwald-Junghanns ME, Sablinskas V, Fuhrmann H, et al. Label free molecular sexing of monomorphic birds using infrared spectroscopic imaging. Talanta. 2016;150:155–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steiner G, Bartels T, Stelling A, Krautwald-Junghanns ME, Fuhrmann H, Sablinskas V, et al. Gender determination of fertilized unincubated chicken eggs by infrared spectroscopic imaging. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;400(9):2775–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tran HT, Ferrell W, Butt TR. An estrogen sensor for poultry sex sorting. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(4):1358–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phelps P, Bhutada A, Bryan S, Chalker A, Ferrell B, Neuman S, et al. Automated identification of male layer chicks prior to hatch. World Poult Sci J. 2003;59(1):33–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weissmann A, Reitemeier S, Hahn A, Gottschalk J, Einspanier A. Sexing domestic chicken before hatch: a new method for in ovo gender identification. Theriogenology. 2013;80(3):199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clinton M, Haines L, Belloir B, McBride D. Sexing chick embryos: a rapid and simple protocol. Br Poult Sci. 2001;42(1):134–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jensen T, Mace M, Durrant B. Sexing of mid-incubation avian embryos as a management tool for zoological breeding programs. Zoo Biol. 2012;31(6):694–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Porat N, Bogdanov K, Danielli A, Arie A, Samina I, Hadani A. Direct detection of chicken genomic DNA for gender determination by thymine-DNA glycosylase. Br Poult Sci. 2011;52(1):58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yilmaz-Dikmen B, Dikmen S. A morphometric method of sexing white layer eggs. Braz J Poult Sci. 2013;15(3):203–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Webster B, Hayes W, Pike TW. Avian egg odour encodes information on embryo sex, fertility and development. Plos One. 2015;10(1):e0116345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galli R, Preusse G, Uckermann O, Bartels T, Krautwald-Junghanns ME, Koch E, et al. In ovo sexing of domestic chicken eggs by Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2016;88:8657–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wei D, Chen S, Liu Q. Review of fluorescence suppression techniques in Raman spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2015;50(5):387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gosnell ME, Anwer AG, Mahbub SB, Menon PS, Inglis DW, Adhikary PP, et al. Quantitative non-invasive cell characterisation and discrimination based on multispectral autofluorescence features. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rudbeck L, Dissing J. Rapid, simple alkaline extraction of human genomic DNA from whole blood, buccal epithelial cells, semen and forensic stains for PCR. Biotechniques. 1998;25(4):588–90.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS. Touchdown PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(14):4008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol. 1999;30(1):116–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schart C. Thesis: Entwiklung einer Steuerung für die Fokussierung und das Tracking embryionaler Blutgefäße im Hühnerei. Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden. 2015.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baumann R, Meuer HJ. Blood-oxygen transport in the early avian embryo. Physiol Rev. 1992;72(4):941–65.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sheng G. Primitive and definitive erythropoiesis in the yolk sac: a bird’s eye view. Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54(6–7):1033–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnston P. Hematocrit values for the chick embryo at various ages. Am J Physiol. 1955;180(2):361–2.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Campbell GL, Weintraub H, Mayhall BH, Holtzer H. Primitive erythropoiesis in chick embryogenesis. 2. Correlation between Hemoglobin Synthesis and the Mitotic History. J Cell Physiol. 1971;50(3):669–81.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berezin MY, Achilefu S. Fluorescence lifetime measurements and biological imaging. Chem Rev. 2010;110(5):2641–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hirsch RE. Heme-protein fluorescence. In: Lakowicz JR, editor. Topics in fluorescence spectroscopy, Vol. 6 Protein Fluorescence. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. p. 221–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chaiken J, Finney WF, Yang X, Knudson PE, Peterson K, Weinstock RS, et al. Progress in the noninvasive, in vivo, tissue modulated Raman spectroscopy of human blood. P SPIE. 2001;4254:216–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chaiken J, Goodisman J, Deng B, Bussjager RJ, Shaheen G. Simultaneous, noninvasive observation of elastic scattering, fluorescence and inelastic scattering as a monitor of blood flow and hematocrit in human fingertip capillary beds. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14(5):050505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee JY, Ji HS, Lee SJ. Micro-PIV measurements of blood flow in extraembryonic blood vessels of chicken embryos. Physiol Meas. 2007;28(10):1149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tagirov M, Golovan S. Sexual dimorphism in the early embryogenesis of the chicken (Gallus Gallus domesticus). Mol Reprod Dev. 2015;82(5):332–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morita VS, Boleli IC, Cargnelutti A. Hematological values and body, heart and liver weights of male and female broiler embryos of young and old breeder eggs. Braz J Poultry Sci. 2009;11(1):7–15.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abdi H, Williams LJ. Principal component analysis. WIREs Comput Stat. 2010;2(4):433–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bonnier F, Byrne HJ. Understanding the molecular information contained in principal component analysis of vibrational spectra of biological systems. Analyst. 2012;137(2):322–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Talari ACS, Movasaghi Z, Rehman S, Rehman I. Raman spectroscopy of biological tissues. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2015;50(1):46–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bankapur A, Zachariah E, Chidangil S, Valiathan M, Mathur D. Raman tweezers spectroscopy of live, single red and white blood cells. Plos One. 2010;5(4):e10427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cuadros MA, Coltey P, Carmen NM, Martin C. Demonstration of a phagocytic cell system belonging to the hemopoietic lineage and originating from the yolk sac in the early avian embryo. Development. 1992;115(1):157–68.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    McIntyre BA, Alev C, Tarui H, Jakt LM, Sheng G. Expression profiling of circulating non-red blood cells in embryonic blood. BMC Dev Biol. 2008;8:21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brereton RG, Lloyd GR. Support vector machines for classification and regression. Analyst. 2010;135(2):230–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol. 1951;88(1):49–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Speksnijder G, Ivarie R. A modified method of shell windowing for producing somatic or germline chimeras in fertilized chicken eggs. Poult Sci. 2000;79(10):1430–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fineman RM, Schoenwolf GC, Huff M, Davis PL. Causes of windowing-induced dysmorphogenesis (neural tube defects and early amnion deficit spectrum) in chicken embryos. Am J Med Genet. 1986;25(3):489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kaleta EF, Redmann T. Approaches to determine the sex prior to and after incubation of chicken eggs and of day-old chicks. World Poult Sci J. 2008;64(3):391–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Aleksandrowicz E, Herr I. Ethical euthanasia and short-term anesthesia of the chick embryo. Altex-Altern Tierexp. 2015;32(2):143–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberta Galli
    • 1
  • Grit Preusse
    • 1
  • Ortrud Uckermann
    • 2
  • Thomas Bartels
    • 3
  • Maria-Elisabeth Krautwald-Junghanns
    • 3
  • Edmund Koch
    • 1
  • Gerald Steiner
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensoring and MonitoringTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, NeurosurgeryTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  3. 3.Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Birds and ReptilesUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.Faculty of PhysicsVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations