Skip to main content
Log in

Real-time cdPCR opens a window into events occurring in the first few PCR amplification cycles

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) end-point limiting dilution techniques, collectively termed “digital PCR (dPCR)”, have been proposed as providing a potentially primary method for DNA quantification. We are evaluating several commercially available dPCR systems for use in certifying mass concentration in human genomic DNA reference materials. To better understand observed anomalies among results from chamber- and droplet-dPCR (cdPCR and ddPCR) systems, we have developed a graphical tool for evaluating and documenting the performance of PCR assays in real-time cdPCR systems: the ogive plot, the cumulative distribution of crossing threshold values. The ogive structure appears to embed information about early amplification events. We have successfully simulated ogives observed with different assays and reaction conditions using a four-stage amplification model parameterized by the probability of creating an intact 1) first generation “long” amplicon of indeterminate length from an original DNA target, 2) second generation defined-length amplicon from a long amplicon, and 3) defined-length amplicon from another defined-length amplicon. We are using insights from this model to optimize dPCR assay design and reaction conditions and to help validate assays proposed for use in value-assigning DNA reference materials.

Cumulative distributions of crossing threshold (Ct) values for the same human genomic DNA evaluated with eight assays with a real-time chamber digital PCR platform. The shape and location of the curves (ogives) embed information about the PCR amplification process

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kline MC, Duewer DL, Redman JW, Butler JM (2003) NIST mixed stain study #3: DNA quantitation accuracy and its influence on short tandem repeat multiplex signal intensity. Anal Chem 75(10):2463–2469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sykes PJ, Neoh SH, Brisco MJ, Hughes E, Condon J, Morley AA (1992) Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution. Biotechniques 13(3):444–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JCGM 200 (2012) International vocabulary of metrology –basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Sèvres, France. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html

  4. De Bièvre P, Dybkaer R, Fajgelj A, Hibbert DB (2011) Metrological traceability of measurement results in chemistry: concepts and implementation. Pure Appl Chem 83(10):1873–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tellinghuisen J, Spiess A-N (2014) Comparing real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis methods for precision, linearity, and accuracy of estimating amplification efficiency. Anal Biochem 449:76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tellinghuisen J, Spiess A-N (2014) Statistical uncertainty and its propagation in the analysis of quantitative polymerase chain reaction data: comparison of methods. Anal Biochem 464:94–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs R, Blakesley R (1983) Guide to the use of type II restriction endonucleases. Methods Enzymol 100:3–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. CDC/NIH (2009) In: Chosewood LC, Wilson DE (eds) Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories, 5th edn. HHS publication No. (CDC) 21–1112. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/biosafety/publications/bmbl5/index.htm

  9. Applied Biosystems (2003) Quantifiler human DNA quantitation kit and Quantifiler Y human male DNA quantitation kit user’s manual, Part Number 4344790 Rev A. Foster City

  10. Stolovitzky G, Cecchi G (1996) Efficiency of DNA replication in the polymerase chain reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:12947–12952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Justice through an interagency agreement with the NIST Special Programs Office.

Disclaimer

Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this report to specify adequately experimental conditions or reported results. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the equipment, instruments, or materials identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Duewer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 62 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duewer, D.L., Kline, M.C. & Romsos, E.L. Real-time cdPCR opens a window into events occurring in the first few PCR amplification cycles. Anal Bioanal Chem 407, 9061–9069 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9073-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9073-8

Keywords

Navigation