Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 407, Issue 21, pp 6429–6434 | Cite as

Rapid evaluation of the quantity of drugs encapsulated within nanoparticles by high-performance liquid chromatography in a monolithic silica column

  • Naoki Itoh
  • Tomofumi Santa
  • Masaru KatoEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Drug-containing nanoparticles, the foundation of nanomedicine, provide promise for the safe and effective delivery of drugs to their targets. In this study, we developed a simple method to determine the relative quantities of nanoparticle-encapsulated drugs by HPLC using a commercially available monolithic silica column. Amphotericin B- and irinotecan-containing nanoparticles produced nearly simultaneous elution peaks (~7 min), suggesting that elution was largely driven by hydrodynamic effects and was relatively unaffected by differences in the encapsulated drug. A good correlation was observed between the intensity of the nanoparticle peak and the relative quantity of encapsulated drug. We used our method to characterize the effects of drug quantity and nanoparticle size on drug encapsulation rates within the nanoparticles. Encapsulation increased with increasing quantities of the drug in the preparation solution. This effect was greater for irinotecan than for amphotericin B. Although absolute encapsulation also increased with increasing nanoparticle size, encapsulation efficiency decreased. Thus, the monolith column is suitable for evaluating nanomedicine quality and may be used to evaluate many kinds of nanomaterials.

Graphical Abstract

Evaluation method of quantity of drug encapsulated within nanoparticles was developed. The method can be applicable for a rapid quality assurance of nanomedicine

Keywords

HPLC Monolith Nanoparticle Drug Nanomedicine 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants (Kakenhi) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan and JSPS Core-to-Core Program, A. Advanced Research Networks.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ferrari M (2005) Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Cancer 5(3):161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis ME, Chen Z, Shin DM (2008) Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7(9):771–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murakami M, Cabral H, Matsumoto Y, Wu S, Kano MR, Yamori T, Nishiyama N, Kataoka K (2011) Improving drug potency and efficacy by nanocarrier-mediated subcellular targeting. Sci Transl Med 3(64):64ra2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murayama S, Jo J, Shibata Y, Liang K, Santa T, Saga T, Aoki I, Kato M (2013) A simple preparation of polyethylene glycol-based soft nanoparticles containing dual imaging probes. J Mater Chem B 1(38):4932–4938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sapsford KE, Tyner KM, Dair BJ, Deschamps JR, Medintz IL (2011) Analyzing nanomaterial bioconjugates: a review of current and emerging purification and characterization techniques. Anal Chem 83(12):4453–4488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kranz C, Eaton DC, Mizaikoff B (2011) Analytical challenges in nanomedicine. Anal Bioanal Chem 399(7):2309–2311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kato M, Sasaki M, Ueyama Y, Koga A, Sano A, Higashi T, Sanata T (2015) Comparison of the migration behavior of polyethylene glycol- and silica-based nanoparticles using micellar electrokinetic chromatography. J Sep Sci 38(3):468–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deshpande NM, Gangrade MG, Kekare MB, Vaidya VV (2010) Determination of free and liposomal amphotericin B in human plasma by liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy with solid phase extraction and protein precipitation techniques. J Chromatogr B 878(3–4):315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thies RL, Cowens DW, Cullis PR, Bally MB, Mayer LD (1990) Method for rapid separation of liposome-associated doxorubicin from free doxorubicin in plasma. Anal Biochem 188(1):65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayer LD, St-Onge G (1995) Determination of free and liposome-associated doxorubicin and vincristine levels in plasma under equilibrium conditions employing ultrafiltration techniques. Anal Biochem 232(2):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang F, Wang H, Liu M, Hu P, Jiang J (2013) Determination of free and total vincristine in human plasma after intravenous administration of vincristine sulfate liposome injection using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1275:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chin DL, Lum BL, Sikic BI (2002) Rapid determination of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin and its major metabolite in human plasma by ultraviolet-visible high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B 779(2):259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Druckmann S, Gabizon A, Barenholz Y (1989) Separation of liposome-associated doxorubicin from non-liposome-associated doxorubicin in human plasma: implications for pharmacokinetic studies. Biochim Biophys Acta 980(3):381–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oku N, MacDonald RC (1983) Differential effects of alkali metal chlorides on formation of giant liposomes by freezing and thawing and by dialysis. Biochemistry 22(4):855–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anzai K, Yoshida M, Kirino Y (1990) Change in intravesicular volume of liposomes by freeze-thaw treatment as studied by the ESR stopped-flow technique. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1021(1):21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang XM, Patel AB, de Graaf RA, Behar KL (2004) Determination of liposomal encapsulation efficiency using proton NMR spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lipids 127(1):113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edwards KA, Baeumner AJ (2006) Analysis of liposomes. Talanta 68(5):1432–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gómez-Hens A, Fernández-Romero JM (2006) Analytical methods for the control of liposomal delivery systems. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 25(2):167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamamoto E, Hyodo K, Ohnishi N, Suzuki T, Ishihara H, Kikuchi H, Asakawa N (2011) Direct, simultaneous measurement of liposome-encapsulated and released drugs in plasma by on-line SPE-SPE-HPLC. J Chromatogr B 879(30):3620–3625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Itoh N, Sano A, Santa T, Kato M (2014) Simultaneous analytical method of nanoparticles and small molecules using monolithic column. Analyst 139(18):4453–4457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sakai-Kato K, Ota S, Takeuchi T, Kawanishi T (2011) Size separation of colloidally dispersed nanoparticles using a monolithic capillary column. J Chromatogr A 1218(32):5520–5526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kato M, Sakai-Kato K, Jin H-M, Kubota K, Miyano H, Toyo’oka T, Dulay MT, Zare RN (2004) Integration of on-line protein digestion, peptide separation, and protein identification using pepsin-coated photopolymerized sol-gel columns and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 76(7):1896–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kato M, Inuzuka K, Sakai-Kato K, Toyo’oka T (2005) Monolithic bioreactor immobilizing trypsin for high-throughput analysis. Anal Chem 77(6):1813–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takagi K, Murayama S, Sakai T, Asai M, Santa T, Kato M (2014) A computer simulation study of the network structure of a hydrogel prepared from a tetra-armed star pre-polymer. Soft Matter 10(20):3553–3559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amamoto T, Santa T, Kato M (2014) Reduction of molecular leaching from a gel matrix for the precisely controlled release of encapsulated molecules by light stimulus. Chem Pharm Bull 62(7):649–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yokoi T, Sakamoto Y, Terasaki O, Kubota Y, Okubo T, Tatsumi T (2006) Periodic arrangement of silica nanospheres assisted by amino acids. J Am Chem Soc 128(42):13664–13665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yokoi T, Wakabayashi J, Otsuka Y, Fan W, Iwama M, Watanabe R, Aramaki K, Shimojima A, Tatsumi T, Okubo T (2009) Mechanism of formation of uniform-sized silica nanospheres catalyzed by basic amino acids. Chem Mater 21(15):3719–3729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ishizuka F, Liu XS, Murayama S, Santa T, Kato M (2014) Development a spatiotemporal control method of molecular function using silica-based photodegradable nanoparticles that can be prepared at a mild condition. J Mater Chem B 2(26):4153–4158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Devadasu VR, Bhardwaj V, Kumar MN (2013) Can controversial nanotechnology promise drug delivery? Chem Rev 113(3):1686–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and GPLLI ProgramThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations