Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 407, Issue 21, pp 6257–6273 | Cite as

Transformation products of emerging contaminants in the environment and high-resolution mass spectrometry: a new horizon

  • Yolanda PicóEmail author
  • Damià Barceló
Review
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry in Food and Environmental Analysis

Abstract

It is crucial to study the presence of transformation products (TPs) of emerging contaminants that can be potentially found in the environment after biological or chemical degradation. This review focuses on the potential and shortcomings of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) to identify these TPs, with emphasis on recent developments in mass analyzers, data evaluation, and compound identification workflows and applications. Advances in HRMS technologies, including direct introduction or in-line chromatographic separation modes, ionization techniques, mass analyzers, and detection methods, have led to powerful tools to assess the molecular changes and the opening of new horizons to identify unknown molecules. Advances in HRMS pertaining to the generation of analytical data for the main methods to identify TPs, including nontargeted and targeted approaches as they are applied to elucidate the structure of TPs, are also discussed.

Keywords

Abiotic degradation Aquatic environment Biodegradation Emerging contaminants Liquid chromatography Orbitrap Time-of-flight Transformation product Accurate-mass measurement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the projects “Assessing and Predicting Effects on Water Quantity and Quality in Iberian Rivers Caused by Global Change (SCARCE)” (no. CSD2009-00065; http://www.scarceconsolider.es) and “Evaluation of Emerging Contaminants in the Turia River Basins: From Basic Research to the Application of Environmental Forensics (EMERFOR)” (GCL2011-29703-C02-02; http://mefturia.es).

References

  1. 1.
    Hernández F, Ibañez M, Bade R, Bijlsma L, Sancho JV (2014) Investigation of pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs in waters by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. Trends Anal Chem 63:140–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kosma CI, Lambropoulou DA, Albanis TA (2014) Investigation of PPCPs in wastewater treatment plants in Greece: occurrence, removal and environmental risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 466:421–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carmona E, Andreu V, Picó Y (2014) Occurrence of acidic pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Turia River Basin: from waste to drinking water. Sci Total Environ 484:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Devier MH, Mazellier P, Ait-Aissa S, Budzinski H (2011) New challenges in environmental analytical chemistry: identification of toxic compounds in complex mixtures. C R Chim 14:766–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andrés-Costa MJ, Rubio-López N, Morales Suárez-Varela M, Picó Y (2014) Occurrence and removal of drugs of abuse in wastewater treatment plants of Valencia (Spain). Environ Pollut 194:152–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Doorslaer X, Dewulf J, Van Langenhove H, Demeestere K (2014) Fluoroquinolone antibiotics: an emerging class of environmental micropollutants. Sci Total Environ 500:250–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Postigo C, Richardson SD (2014) Transformation of pharmaceuticals during oxidation/disinfection processes in drinking water treatment. J Hazard Mater 279:461–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu J, Avendano SM (2013) Microbial degradation of polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in the environment: a review. Environ Int 61:98–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hübner U, von Gunten U, Jekel M (2015) Evaluation of the persistence of transformation products from ozonation of trace organic compounds – a critical review. Water Res 68:150–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Toolaram AP, Kümmerer K, Schneider M (2014) Environmental risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs and their transformation products: a focus on their genotoxicity characterization-state of knowledge and short comings. Mutat Res 760:18–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petsas A, Vagi M, Nikolaou A, Kostopoulou M (2013) Trends in the analysis of pollutant transformation products in the marine environment. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on environmental science and technology, 474, CEST, Athens, Greece. http://cest2013.gnest.org/. Accessed 11 May 2015
  12. 12.
    Fatta-Kassinos D, Kalavrouziotis IK, Koukoulakis PN, Vasquez MI (2011) The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment. Sci Total Environ 409:3555–3563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitrano DM, Motellier S, Clavaguera S, Nowack B (2015) Review of nanomaterial aging and transformations through the life cycle of nano-enhanced products. Environ Int 77:132–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Evgenidou EN, Konstantinou IK, Lambropoulou DA (2015) Occurrence and removal of transformation products of PPCPs and illicit drugs in wastewaters: a review. Sci Total Environ 505:905–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haddad T, Baginska E, Kümmerer K (2015) Transformation products of antibiotic and cytostatic drugs in the aquatic cycle that result from effluent treatment and abiotic/biotic reactions in the environment: an increasing challenge calling for higher emphasis on measures at the beginning of the pipe. Water Res 72:75–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agüera A (2012) Photodegradation pathways of emerging contaminants in water. In: Belgiorno V, Rizo L (eds) Emerging contaminants into the environment: contamination pathways and control, ASTER, Fisiciano, Italy, pp 27–44Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lapworth DJ, Baran N, Stuart ME, Ward RS (2012) Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater: a review of sources, fate and occurrence. Environ Pollut 163:287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Postigo C, Barceló D (2015) Synthetic organic compounds and their transformation products in groundwater: occurrence, fate and mitigation. Sci Total Environ 503:32–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horvat AJM, Petrovic M, Babic S, Pavlovic DM, Asperger D, Pelko S, Mance AD, Kastelan-Macan M (2012) Analysis, occurrence and fate of anthelmintics and their transformation products in the environment. Trends Anal Chem 31:61–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bletsou AA, Jeon J, Hollender J, Archontaki E, Thomaidis NS (2015) Targeted and non-targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric workflows for identification of transformation products of emerging pollutants in the aquatic environment. Trends Anal Chem 66:32–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosi-Marshall EJ, Royer TV (2012) Pharmaceutical compounds and ecosystem function: an emerging research challenge for aquatic ecologists. Ecosystems 15:867–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stasinakis AS (2012) Review on the fate of emerging contaminants during sludge anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 121:432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farré M, Kantiani L, Petrovic M, Pérez S, Barceló D (2012) Achievements and future trends in the analysis of emerging organic contaminants in environmental samples by mass spectrometry and bioanalytical techniques. J Chromatogr A 1259:86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fischer K, Fries E, Korner W, Schmalz C, Zwiener C (2012) New developments in the trace analysis of organic water pollutants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94:11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jakimska A, Kot-Wasik A, Namiesnik J (2014) The current state-of-the-art in the determination of pharmaceutical residues in environmental matrices using hyphenated techniques. Crit Rev Anal Chem 44:277–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zonja B, Aceña J, Pérez S, Barceló D (2013) methods for elucidation of transformation pathways: identification of intermediate products, chiral, and isotope-ratio mass spectrometry analysis. In: Petrovic M, Barceló D, Pérez S (eds) Comprehensive analytical chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 593–610Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kosjek T, Perko S, Zupanc M, Hren MZ, Dragicevic TL, Zigon D, Kompare B, Heath E (2012) Environmental occurrence, fate and transformation of benzodiazepines in water treatment. Water Res 46:355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hernández F, Sancho JV, Ibáñez M, Abad E, Portoles T, Mattioli L (2012) Current use of high-resolution mass spectrometry in the environmental sciences. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:1251–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Guillen D, Ginebreda A, Farré M, Darbra RM, Petrovic M, Gros M, Barceló D (2012) Prioritization of chemicals in the aquatic environment based on risk assessment: analytical, modeling and regulatory perspective. Sci Total Environ 440:236–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Delgado LF, Charles P, Glucina K, Morlay C (2012) The removal of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceutically activated compounds and cyanobacterial toxins during drinking water preparation using activated carbon—a review. Sci Total Environ 435:509–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Delgado LF, Charles P, Glucina K, Morlay C (2012) QSAR-like models: a potential tool for the selection of PhACs and EDCs for monitoring purposes in drinking water treatment systems - a review. Water Res 46:6196–6209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Agüera A, Bueno MJM, Fernández-Alba AR (2013) New trends in the analytical determination of emerging contaminants and their transformation products in environmental waters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:3496–3515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zenker A, Cicero MR, Prestinaci F, Bottoni P, Carere M (2014) Bioaccumulation and biomagnification potential of pharmaceuticals with a focus to the aquatic environment. J Environ Manag 133:378–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Clarke RM, Cummins E (2014) Evaluation of "classic" and emerging contaminants resulting from the application of biosolids to agricultural lands: a review. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21:492–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lange FT, Scheurer M, Brauch HJ (2012) Artificial sweeteners—a recently recognized class of emerging environmental contaminants: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:2503–2518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zedda M, Zwiener C (2012) Is nontarget screening of emerging contaminants by LC-HRMS successful? A plea for compound libraries and computer tools. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:2493–2502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nurmi J, Pellinen J, Rantalainen AL (2012) Critical evaluation of screening techniques for emerging environmental contaminants based on accurate mass measurements with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 47:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prasse C, Wagner M, Schulz R, Ternes TA (2011) Biotransformation of the antiviral drugs acyclovir and penciclovir in activated sludge treatment. Environ Sci Technol 45:2761–2769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wick A, Wagner M, Ternes TA (2011) Elucidation of the transformation pathway of the opium alkaloid codeine in biological wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 45:3374–3385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang N, Buck RC, Szostek B, Sulecki LM, Wolstenholme BW (2012) 5:3 polyfluorinated acid aerobic biotransformation in activated sludge via novel "one-carbon removal pathways". Chemosphere 87:527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rubirola A, Llorca M, Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Casas N, Rodriguez-Roda I, Barceló D, Buttiglieri G (2014) Characterization of metoprolol biodegradation and its transformation products generated in activated sludge batch experiments and in full scale WWTPs. Water Res 63:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kosjek T, Negreira N, López de Alda M, Barceló D (2015) Aerobic activated sludge transformation of methotrexate: identification of biotransformation products. Chemosphere 119:S42–S50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Beel R, Eversloh CL, Ternes TA (2013) Biotransformation of the UV-filter sulisobenzone: challenges for the identification of transformation products. Environ Sci Technol 47:6819–6828Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Luft A, Wagner M, Ternes TA (2014) Transformation of biocides Irgarol and terbutryn in the biological wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 48:244–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chen X, Casas ME, Nielsen JL, Wimmer R, Bester K (2015) Identification of triclosan-O-sulfate and other transformation products of triclosan formed by activated sludge. Sci Total Environ 505:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mardal M, Meyer MR (2014) Studies on the microbial biotransformation of the novel psychoactive substance methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) in wastewater by means of liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Sci Total Environ 493:588–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Huntscha S, Hofstetter TB, Schymanski EL, Spahr S, Hollender J (2014) Biotransformation of benzotriazoles: insights from transformation product identification and compound-specific isotope analysis. Environ Sci Technol 48:4435–4443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gulde R, Helbling DE, Scheidegger A, Fenner K (2014) pH-dependent biotransformation of ionizable organic micropollutants in activated sludge. Environ Sci Technol 48:13760–13768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tseng N, Wang N, Szostek B, Mahendra S (2014) Biotransformation of 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (6:2 FTOH) by a wood-rotting fungus. Environ Sci Technol 48:4012–4020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Llorca M, Rodríguez-Mozaz S, Couillerot O, Panigoni K, de Gunzburg J, Bayer S, Czaja R, Barceló D (2015) Identification of new transformation products during enzymatic treatment of tetracycline and erythromycin antibiotics at laboratory scale by an on-line turbulent flow liquid-chromatography coupled to a high resolution mass spectrometer LTQ-Orbitrap. Chemosphere 119:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mejia Avendano S, Liu J (2015) Production of PFOS from aerobic soil biotransformation of two perfluoroalkyl sulfonamide derivatives. Chemosphere 119:1084–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Li Z, Maier MP, Radke M (2014) Screening for pharmaceutical transformation products formed in river sediment by combining ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry with a rapid data-processing method. Anal Chim Acta 810:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Terzic S, Senta I, Matosic M, Ahel M (2011) Identification of biotransformation products of macrolide and fluoroquinolone antimicrobials in membrane bioreactor treatment by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 401:353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pérez-Parada A, Agüera A, Del Mar Gomez-Ramos M, Garcia-Reyes JF, Heinzen H, Fernández-Alba AR (2011) Behavior of amoxicillin in wastewater and river water: identification of its main transformation products by liquid chromatography/electrospray quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25:731–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Aceña J, Pérez S, Gardinali P, Abad JL, Eichhorn P, Heuett N, Barceló D (2014) Structure elucidation of phototransformation products of unapproved analogs of the erectile dysfunction drug sildenafil in artificial freshwater with UPLC-Q Exactive-MS. J Mass Spectrom 49:1279–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Diez-Mato E, Cortezon-Tamarit FC, Bogialli S, García-Fresnadillo D, Marazuela MD (2014) Phototransformation of model micropollutants in water samples by photocatalytic singlet oxygen production in heterogeneous medium. Appl Catal B 160:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Eichhorn P, Pérez S, Aceña J, Gardinali P, Abad JL, Barceló D (2012) Identification of phototransformation products of sildenafil (Viagra) and its N-demethylated human metabolite under simulated sunlight. J Mass Spectrom 47:701–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jelic A, Michael I, Achilleos A, Hapeshi E, Lambropoulou D, Pérez S, Petrovic M, Fatta-Kassinos D, Barceló D (2013) Transformation products and reaction pathways of carbamazepine during photocatalytic and sonophotocatalytic treatment. J Hazard Mater 263:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Souissi Y, Bouchonnet S, Bourcier S, Kusk KO, Sablier M, Andersen HR (2013) Identification and ecotoxicity of degradation products of chloroacetamide herbicides from UV-treatment of water. Sci Total Environ 458:527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Haddad T, Kümmerer K (2014) Characterization of photo-transformation products of the antibiotic drug ciprofloxacin with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in combination with accurate mass determination using an LTQ-Orbitrap. Chemosphere 115:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Michael I, Achilleos A, Lambropoulou D, Torrens VO, Pérez S, Petrovic M, Barceló D, Fatta-Kassinos D (2014) Proposed transformation pathway and evolution profile of diclofenac and ibuprofen transformation products during (sono)photocatalysis. Appl Catal B 147:1015–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zonja B, Goncalves C, Pérez S, Delgado A, Petrovic M, Alpendurada MF, Barceló D (2014) Evaluation of the phototransformation of the antiviral zanamivir in surface waters through identification of transformation products. J Hazard Mater 265:296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Segura PA, Kaplan P, Yargeau V (2013) Identification and structural elucidation of ozonation transformation products of estrone. Chem Cent J 7:74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tay KS, Rahman NA, Bin Abas MR (2013) Ozonation of metoprolol in aqueous solution: ozonation by-products and mechanisms of degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:3115–3121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bautitz IR, Velosa AC, Nogueira RFP (2012) Zero valent iron mediated degradation of the pharmaceutical diazepam. Chemosphere 88:688–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sirtori C, Agüera A, Carra I, Pérez JAS (2014) Identification and monitoring of thiabendazole transformation products in water during Fenton degradation by LC-QTOF-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:5323–5337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ji YF, Ferronato C, Salvador A, Yang X, Chovelon JM (2014) Degradation of ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole by ferrous-activated persulfate: implications for remediation of groundwater contaminated by antibiotics. Sci Total Environ 472:800–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Michael I, Hapeshi E, Aceña J, Pérez S, Petrovic M, Zapata A, Barceló D, Malato S, Fatta-Kassinos D (2013) Light-induced catalytic transformation of ofloxacin by solar Fenton in various water matrices at a pilot plant: mineralization and characterization of major intermediate products. Sci Total Environ 461:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Eversloh CL, Henning N, Schulz M, Ternes TA (2014) Electrochemical treatment of iopromide under conditions of reverse osmosis concentrates - elucidation of the degradation pathway. Water Res 48:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Grbovic G, Trebse P, Dolenc D, Lebedev AT, Sarakha M (2013) LC/MS study of the UV filter hexyl 2-[4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzoyl]-benzoate (DHHB) aquatic chlorination with sodium hypochlorite. J Mass Spectrom 48:1232–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Boix C, Ibáñez M, Bijlsma L, Sancho JV, Hernández F (2014) Investigation of cannabis biomarkers and transformation products in waters by liquid chromatography coupled to time of flight and triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 99:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Jewell KS, Wick A, Ternes TA (2014) Comparisons between abiotic nitration and biotransformation reactions of phenolic micropollutants in activated sludge. Water Res 48:478–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Laurence C, Rivard M, Martens T, Morin C, Buisson D, Bourcier S, Sablier M, Oturan MA (2014) Anticipating the fate and impact of organic environmental contaminants: a new approach applied to the pharmaceutical furosemide. Chemosphere 113:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ibáñez M, Gracia-Lor E, Sancho JV, Hernández F (2012) Importance of MS selectivity and chromatographic separation in LC-MS/MS-based methods when investigating pharmaceutical metabolites in water. Dipyrone as a case of study. J Mass Spectrom 47:1040–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hernández F, Ibáñez M, Gracia-Lor E, Sancho JV (2011) Retrospective LC-QTOF-MS analysis searching for pharmaceutical metabolites in urban wastewater. J Sep Sci 34:3517–3526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gómez-Ramos MD, Pérez-Parada A, Garcia-Reyes JF, Fernandez-Alba AR, Aguera A (2011) Use of an accurate-mass database for the systematic identification of transformation products of organic contaminants in wastewater effluents. J Chromatogr A 1218:8002–8012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hug C, Ulrich N, Schulze T, Brack W, Krauss M (2014) Identification of novel micropollutants in wastewater by a combination of suspect and nontarget screening. Environ Pollut 184:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Masiá A, Ibáñez M, Blasco C, Sancho JV, Picó Y, Hernández F (2013) Combined use of liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in systematic screening of pesticides and other contaminants in water samples. Anal Chim Acta 761:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Masiá A, Campo J, Blasco C, Picó Y (2014) Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry to identify contaminants in water: an insight on environmental forensics. J Chromatogr A 1345:86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Muller A, Schulz W, Ruck WKL, Weber WH (2011) A new approach to data evaluation in the non-target screening of organic trace substances in water analysis. Chemosphere 85:1211–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    López SH, Ulaszewska MM, Hernando MD, Bueno MJM, Gómez MJ, Fernández-Alba AR (2014) Post-acquisition data processing for the screening of transformation products of different organic contaminants. Two-year monitoring of river water using LC-ESI-QTOF-MS and GCxGC-EI-TOF-MS. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:12583–12604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hernández F, Portoles T, Ibáñez M, Bustos-Lopez MC, Diaz R, Botero-Coy AM, Fuentes CL, Peñuela G (2012) Use of time-of-flight mass spectrometry for large screening of organic pollutants in surface waters and soils from a rice production area in Colombia. Sci Total Environ 439:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Souchier M, Benali-Raclot D, Benanou D, Boireau V, Gomez E, Casellas C, Chiron S (2015) Screening triclocarban and its transformation products in river sediment using liquid chromatography and high resolution mass spectrometry. Sci Total Environ 502:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Chiaia-Hernández AC, Krauss M, Hollender J (2013) Screening of lake sediments for emerging contaminants by liquid chromatography atmospheric pressure photoionization and electrospray ionization coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 47:976–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Bueno MJM, Boillot C, Munaron D, Fenet H, Casellas C, Gomez E (2014) Occurrence of venlafaxine residues and its metabolites in marine mussels at trace levels: development of analytical method and a monitoring program. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:601–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Bueno MJM, Boillot C, Fenet H, Chiron S, Casellas C, Gomez E (2013) Fast and easy extraction combined with high resolution-mass spectrometry for residue analysis of two anticonvulsants and their transformation products in marine mussels. J Chromatogr A 1305:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Vona A, di Martino F, Garcia-Ivars J, Picó Y, Mendoza-Roca JA, Iborra-Clar MI (2015) Comparison of different removal techniques for selected pharmaceuticals. J Water Process Eng 5:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Pascual-Aguilar J, Andreu V, Gimeno-García E, Picó Y (2015) Current anthropogenic pressures on agro-ecological protected coastal wetlands. Sci Total Environ 503–504:90–199Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Food and Environmental Safety Research Group (SAMA-UV), CIDE (UV, GV, CSIC), Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of ValenciaBurjassotSpain
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Chemistry, IDAEA-CSICBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Catalan Institute for Water Research- ICRAGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations