Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 407, Issue 11, pp 2997–3007 | Cite as

T-2 and HT-2 toxins in oat flakes: development of a certified reference material

  • Robert KöppenEmail author
  • Wolfram Bremser
  • Ina Stephan
  • Karin Klein-Hartwig
  • Tatjana Rasenko
  • Matthias Koch
Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Reference Materials for Chemical Analysis

Abstract

Trichothecene mycotoxins, with T-2 and HT-2 toxins being the main representatives of the type A subgroup, are naturally and worldwide occurring contaminants frequently found in grain-based food and feed. Due to the high consumption of these products and the potential health risk associated herewith, concerns about the safety and quality of food and feed have increased over the last decades at both governmental and consumer levels. Since it is not possible to avoid their occurrence, tremendous efforts have been performed to identify and monitor mycotoxins in food and feed to make their consumption safe. However, suitable certified reference materials (CRMs) intended for quality assurance and quality control purposes are still lacking for many mycotoxin-matrix combinations. Therefore, in the framework of a European Reference Material (ERM®) project, the first CRM for T-2 and HT-2 toxin in ground oat flakes (ERM®-BC720) was developed according to the requirements of ISO Guide 35. The whole process of ERM®-BC720 development, including sample preparation, homogeneity and stability studies and value assignment, is presented. The assignment of the certified mass fractions was based upon an in-house study using high-performance liquid chromatography isotope-dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Simultaneously, an interlaboratory comparison study involving 24 expert laboratories was conducted in order to support the in-house certification study. The certified values and their corresponding expanded uncertainties (k = 2) for both T-2 and HT-2 toxin in ERM®-BC720, traceable to the international system of units, are (82 ± 4) μg kg−1 and (81 ± 4) μg kg−1, respectively.

Keywords

Type A trichothecenes Fusarium toxins Isotope-dilution mass spectrometry Food analysis European Reference Material Quality assurance 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We gratefully thank the mentioned laboratories for participation in the ILC.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2014_8251_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (28 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 28.4 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union, L364, 5–24Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Commission Recommendation (EC) No 576/2006 of 17 August 2006 on the presence of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and fumonisins in products intended for animal feeding. Off J Eur Union, L229, 7–9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Commission Regulation (EC) No 401/2006 of 23 February 2006 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of mycotoxins in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union, L70, 12–34Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Creppy EE (2002) Update of survey, regulation and toxic effects of mycotoxins in Europe. Toxicol Lett 127:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richard JL (2007) Some major mycotoxins and their mycotoxicoses—an overview. Int J Food Microbiol 119:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Food and Agriculture Organization (2001) Safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food. Prepared by the fifty-sixth meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 74. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, p 705Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nazaria L, Pattoria E, Terzib V, Morciab C, Rossi V (2014) Influence of temperature on infection, growth, and mycotoxin production by Fusarium langsethiae and F. sporotrichioides in durum wheat. Food Microbiol 39:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (2011) Scientific opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in food and feed. EFSA Journal 9:2481Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scientific Committee on Food. Opinion of the scientific committee on food on fusarium toxins. Part 5: T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin (adopted on 30 May 2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canady RA, Coker RD, Egan S K, Krska R, Olsen M, Resnik S, Schlatter J (2001) T-2 and HT-2 toxins. In: safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food, WHO food additives series 47, FAO food and nutrition paper 74, pp. 557–680. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lattanzio VMT, Pascale M, Visconti A (2009) Current analytical methods for trichothecene mycotoxins in cereals. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 28:758–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Köppen R, Koch M, Siegel D, Merkel S, Maul R, Nehls I (2010) Determination of mycotoxins in foods: current state of analytical methods and limitations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:1595–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Köppen R, Koch M, Nehls I (2010) Trichothecene analysis in cereals and cereal products. Deut Lebensm-Rundsch 106:66–72Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meneely JP, Ricci F, van Egmond HP, Elliott CT (2011) Current methods of analysis for the determination of trichothecene mycotoxins in food. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30:192–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krska R, Malachova A, Berthiller F, van Egmond HP (2014) Determination of T-2 and HT-2 toxins in food and feed: an update. World Mycotoxin J 7:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pascale M, Panzarini G, Visconti A (2012) Determination of HT-2 and T-2 toxins in oats and wheat by ultra-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection. Talanta 89:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tolgyesi A, Kunsagi Z (2013) Quantification of T-2 and HT-2 mycotoxins in cereals by liquid chromatography-multimode ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. Microchem J 106:300–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Boevre M, Di Mavungu JD, Maene P, Audenaert K, Deforce D, Haesaert G, Eeckhout M, Callebaut A, Berthiller F, Van Peteghem C, De Saeger S (2012) Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, T-2-toxin and some masked metabolites in different cereals and cereal-derived food. Food Addit Contam Part A: Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 29:819–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soleimany F, Jinap S, Faridah A, Khatib A (2012) A UPLC-MS/MS for simultaneous determination of aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, DON, fumonisins, T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin, in cereals. Food Control 25:647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Commission Recommendation (EC) No 165/2013 of 27 March 2013 on the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in cereals and cereal products. Off J Eur Union, L91, 12–15Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Commission Recommendation (EC) No 637/2013 of 4 November 2013 amending Recommendation 2006/576/EC as regards T-2 and HT-2 toxin in compound feed for cats. Off J Eur Union, L294, 44Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mandate for Standardisation Addressed to CEN for Methods of Analysis for Mycotoxins in Food, M/520; European Commission, Health and Consumers Directorate-General: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    BVL L 15.04-1:2012–01, Untersuchung von Lebensmitteln-Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Mykotoxine-T-2-Toxin und HT-2-Toxin in Hafer und Hafererzeugnissen mittels HPLC-MS/MS nach Reinigung an einer Festphase, Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit. Technical rule BVL L 15.04-1:2012–01. Standard method of the German federal office of consumer protection and food safety for the determination of T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin in oats and oat products by HPLC-MS/MS after solid phase cleanup.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Koch M, Bremser W, Köppen R, Krüger R, Rasenko T, Siegel D, Nehls I (2011) Certification of reference materials for ochratoxin A analysis in coffee and wine. Accredit Qual Assur 16:429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Köppen R, Bremser W, Rasenko T, Koch M (2013) Development and certification of a reference material for Fusarium mycotoxins in wheat flour. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:4755–4763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    van der Veen AMH, Nater DAG (1993) Sample preparation from bulk samples—an overview. Fuel Process Technol 36:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Commission Decision 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off J Eur Communities L221, 8–36Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    International Organization for Standardization (2006) Reference materials—general and statistical principles for certification. ISO Guide 35:2006. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lamberty A, Schimmel H, Pauwels J (1998) The study of the stability of reference materials by isochronous measurements. Fresenius J Anal Chem 360:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bremser W, Becker R, Kipphardt H, Lehnik-Habrink P, Panne U, Topferr A (2006) Stability testing in an integrated scheme. Accredit Qual Assur 11:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    International Organization for Standardization (2005) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. ISO 13528:2005. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    ISO/IEC (2008) Guide 98–3:2008 Uncertainty of measurement—part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (2008) International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Köppen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wolfram Bremser
    • 1
  • Ina Stephan
    • 1
  • Karin Klein-Hartwig
    • 1
  • Tatjana Rasenko
    • 1
  • Matthias Koch
    • 1
  1. 1.Division 1.7-Food AnalysisFederal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations