Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty measurement for automated macro program-processed quantitative proton NMR spectra

  • Note
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of a fully automated quantitative proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (qNMR) processing program, including the determination of its processing uncertainty, and the calculations of the combined uncertainty of the qNMR result, is presented with details on the use of a trimmed purity average. Quantitative NMR spectra (1359) were collected over a 4-month period on various concentrations of pseudoephedrine HCl dissolved in D2O (0.0610 to 93.60 mg/mL) containing maleic acid (the internal standard) to yield signal-to-noise ratios ranging from 3 to 72,000 for analyte integral regions. The resulting 5436 purities exhibited a normal distribution about the best estimate of the true value. The median absolute deviation (MAD) statistical method was used to obtain a model of uncertainty relative to the signal-to-noise of the analyte’s integral peaks. The model was then tested using different concentrations of known purity chloroquine diphosphate. qNMR results of numerous illicit heroin HCl samples were compared to those obtained by capillary electrophoresis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pauli GF, Jaki BU, Lankin DC (2005) Quantitative 1H NMR: development and potential of a method for natural products analysis. J Nat Prod 68(1):133–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Malz F, Jancke H (2005) Validation of quantitative NMR. J Pharm Biomed Analysis 38:813–823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellison SLR, Farrant TJ, Barwick VJ (2009) Practical statistics for the analytical scientist: a bench guide. Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain), Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schoenberger T (2012) Determination of standard sample purity using the high-precision 1H-NMR process. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:247–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2008) Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement

  6. Malz F (2008) In: Holzgrabe U, Wawer I, Diehl B (eds) NMR spectroscopy in pharmaceutical analysis, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 43–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lurie IS, Hays PA, Garcia AE, Panicker S (2004) Use of dynamically coated capillaries for the determination of heroin, basic impurities and adulterants with capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr A 1034:227–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick A. Hays.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 336 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hays, P.A., Schoenberger, T. Uncertainty measurement for automated macro program-processed quantitative proton NMR spectra. Anal Bioanal Chem 406, 7397–7400 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8205-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8205-x

Keywords

Navigation