Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A high-sensitivity ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HR-TOFMS) method for screening synthetic cannabinoids and other drugs of abuse in urine

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The continuing emergence of designer drugs imposes high demands on the scope and sensitivity of toxicological drug screening procedures. An ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HR-TOFMS) method was developed for screening and simultaneous confirmation of both designer drugs and other drugs of abuse in urine samples in a single run. The method covered selected synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones, amphetamines, natural cannabinoids, opioids, cocaine and other important drugs of abuse, together with their main urinary metabolites. The database consisted of 277 compounds with molecular formula and exact monoisotopic mass; retention time was included for 192 compounds, and primary and secondary qualifier ion exact mass for 191 and 95 compounds, respectively. Following a solid-phase extraction, separation was performed by UHPLC and mass analysis by HR-TOFMS. MS, and broad-band collision-induced dissociation data were acquired at m/z range 50–700. Compound identification was based on a reverse database search with acceptance criteria for retention time, precursor ion mass accuracy, isotopic pattern and abundance of qualifier ions. Mass resolving power in spiked urine samples was on average FWHM 23,500 and mass accuracy 0.3 mDa. The mean and median cut-off concentrations determined for 75 compounds were 4.2 and 1 ng/mL, respectively. The range of cut-off concentrations for synthetic cannabinoids was 0.2–60 ng/mL and for cathinones 0.7–15 ng/mL. The method proved to combine high sensitivity and a wide scope in a manner not previously reported in drugs of abuse screening. The method’s feasibility was demonstrated with 50 authentic urine samples.

Extracted ion chromatograms of metabolites of synthetic cannabinoids and their fragments, including a new common metabolite: JWH-072-propanoic acid

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Favretto D, Pascali JP, Tagliaro F (2013) New challenges and innovation in forensic toxicology. Focus on the "new psychoactive substances". J Chromatogr A 1287:84–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huffman JW, Zengin G, Wu M-J, Lu J, Hynd G, Bushell K, Thompson ALS, Bushell S, Tartal C, Hurts DP, Reggio PH, Selley DE, Cassidy MP, Wiley JL, Martin BR (2005) Structure-activity relationships for 1-alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles at the cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors: steric and electronic effects of naphthoyl substituents. New highly selective CB(2) receptor agonists. Bioorg Med Chem 13:89–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hermanns-Clausen M, Kneisel S, Szabo B, Auwärter V (2012) Acute toxicity due to the confirmed consumption of synthetic cannabinoids: clinical and laboratory findings. Addiction 108:534–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (2009) EMCDDA 2009 Thematic paper, Understanding the ‘spice’ phenomenon.

  5. Airuehia E, Young-Walker L, Nittler J (2012) A review of bath salts: evolving designer drugs of abuse. J Clinic Toxicol 2:125. doi:10.4172/2161-0495.1000125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fass JA, Fass AD, Garcia AS (2012) Synthetic cathinones (bath salts): legal status and patterns of abuse. Ann Pharmacother 46:436–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Broecker S, Herre S, Wüst B, Zweigenbaum J, Pragst F (2011) Development and practical application of a library of CID accurate mass spectra of more than 2,500 toxic compounds for systematic toxicological analysis by LC-QTOF-MS with data-dependent acquisition. Anal Bioanal Chem 400:101–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee HK, Ho CS, Iu YPH, Lai PSJ, Shek CC, Lo Y-C, Klinke HB, Wood M (2009) Development of a broad toxicological screening technique for urine using ultra-performance liquid chromatography and time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 649:80–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guale F, Shahreza S, Walterscheid JP, Chen H-H, Arndt C, Kelly AT, Mozayani A (2013) Validation of LC-TOF-MS screening for drugs, metabolites, and collateral compounds in forensic toxicology specimens. J Anal Toxicol 37:17–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wissenbach DK, Meyer MR, Remane D, Philipp AA, Weber AA, Maurer HH (2011) Drugs of abuse screening in urine as part of a metabolite-based LC-MSn screening concept. Anal Bioanal Chem 400:3481–3489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Welter J, Meyer MR, Wolf EU, Weinmann W, Kavanagh P, Maurer HH (2013) 2-Methiopropamine, a thiophene analogue of methamphetamine: studies on its metabolism and detectability in the rat and human using GC-MS and LC-(HR)-MS techniques. Anal Bioanal Chem 10:3125–3135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de Castro A, Gergov M, Östman P, Ojanperä I, Pelander A (2012) Combined drug screening and confirmation by liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry with reverse database search. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:1265–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ammann J, McLaren JM, Gerostamoulos D, Beyer J (2012) Detection and quantification of new designer drugs in human blood: part 1—synthetic cannabinoids. J Anal Toxicol 36:372–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kneisel S, Auwärter V (2012) Analysis of 30 synthetic cannabinoids in serum by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry after liquid–liquid extraction. J Mass Spectrom 47:825–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dresen S, Kneisel S, Weinmann W, Zimmermann R, Auwärter V (2011) Development and validation of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitation of synthetic cannabinoids of the aminoalkylindole type and methanandamide in serum and its application to forensic samples. J Mass Spectrom 46:163–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Teske J, Weller J-P, Fieguth A, Rothämel T, Schulz Y, Tröger HD (2010) Sensitive and rapid quantification of the cannabinoid receptor agonist naphthalen-1-yl-(1-pentylindol-3-yl)methanone (JWH-018) in human serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 878:2659–2663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutter M, Kneisel S, Auwärter V, Neukamm MA (2012) Determination of 22 synthetic cannabinoids in human hair by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 903:95–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Salomone A, Gerace E, D'Urso F, Di Corcia D, Vincenti M (2012) Simultaneous analysis of several synthetic cannabinoids, THC, CBD and CBN, in hair by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method validation and application to real samples. J Mass Spectrom 47:604–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Coulter C, Garnier M, Moore C (2011) Synthetic cannabinoids in oral fluid. J Anal Toxicol 35:424–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Strano-Rossi S, Anzillotti L, Castrignano E, Romolo FS, Chiarotti M (2012) Ultra high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry screening method for direct analysis of designer drugs, "spice" and stimulants in oral fluid. J Chromatogr, A 1258:37–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kneisel S, Auwärter V, Kempf J (2012) Analysis of 30 synthetic cannabinoids in oral fluid using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Test Analysis. doi:10.1002/dta.1429

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kneisel S, Speck M, Moosmann B, Corneillie TM, Butlin NG, Auwärter V (2013) LC/ESI-MS/MS method for quantification of 28 synthetic cannabinoids in neat oral fluid and its application to preliminary studies on their detection windows. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:4691–4706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hutter M, Broecker S, Kneisel S, Auwärter V (2012) Identification of the major urinary metabolites in man of seven synthetic cannabinoids of the aminoalkylindole type present as adulterants in ´herbal mixtures´using LC-MS/MS techniques. J Mass Spectrom 47:54–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Möller I, Wintermeyer A, Bender K, Jübner M, Thomas A, Krug O, Schänzer W, Thevis M (2010) Screening for the synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018 and its major metabolites in human doping controls. Drug Test Analysis 3:609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moran CL, Le V-H, Chimalakonda KC, Smedley AL, Lackey FD, Owen SN, Kennedy PD, Endres GW, Ciske FL, Kramer JB, Kornilov AM, Bratton LD, Dobrowolski PJ, Wessinger WD, Fantegrossi WE, Prather PL, James LP, Radominska-Pandya A, Moran JH (2010) Quantitative measurement of JWH-018 and JWH-073 metabolites excreted in human urine. Anal Chem 83:4228–4236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sobolevsky T, Prasolov I, Rodchenkov G (2010) Detection of JWH-018 metabolites in smoking mixture post-administration urine. Forensic Sci Int 200:141–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. de Jager AD, Warner JV, Henman M, Ferguson W, Hall A (2012) LC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of metabolites of eight commonly-used synthetic cannabinoids in human urine—an Australian perspective. J Chromatogr B 897:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ammann J, Drummer OH, Gerostamoulos D, Beyer J (2011) Detection of synthetic cannabinoids in biological samples—a review. Tiaft Bulletin 41:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  29. Baselt RC (2002) Disposition of toxic drugs and chemicals in man, 6th edn. Biomedical Publications, California

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zanchetti G, Floris I, Piccinotti A, Tameni S, Pollettini A (2012) Rapid and robust confirmation and quantification of 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (THC-COOH) in urine by column switching LC-MS-MS analysis. J Mass Spectrom 47:124–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gergov M, Boucher B, Ojanperä I, Vuori E (2001) Toxicological screening of urine for drugs by liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry with automated target library search based on elemental formulas. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 15:521–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ojanperä I, Kolmonen M, Pelander A (2012) Current use of high-resolution mass spectrometry in drug screening relevant to clinical and forensic toxicology and doping control. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:1203–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liotta E, Gottardo R, Bertaso A, Pollettini A (2010) Screening for pharmaco-toxicologically relevant compounds in biosamples using high-resolution mass spectrometry: a 'metabolomic' approach to the discrimination between isomers. J Mass Spectrom 45:261–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Laks S, Pelander A, Vuori E, Ali-Tolppa E, Sippola E, Ojanperä I (2004) Analysis of street drugs in seized material without primary reference standards. Anal Chem 76:7375–7379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ojanperä S, Pelander A, Pelzing M, Krebs I, Vuori E, Ojanperä I (2006) Isotopic pattern and accurate mass determination in urine drug screening by liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:1161–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM (2003) Strategies for the Assessment of Matrix Effect in Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Based on HPLC-MS/MS. Anal Chem 75:3019–3030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wissenbach DK, Meyer MR, Remane D, Weber AA, Maurer HH (2011) Development of the first metabolite-based LC-MSn urine drug screening procedure-exemplified for antidepressants. Anal Bioanal Chem 400:79–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Saleh A, Stephanson NN, Granelli I, Villen T, Beck O (2012) Evaluation of a direct high-capacity target screening approach for urine drug testing using liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 909:6–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lovett DP, Yanes EG, Herbelin TW, Knoerzer TA, Levisky JA (2013) Structure elucidation and identification of a common metabolite for naphthoylindole-based synthetic cannabinoids using LC-TOF and comparison to a synthetic reference standard. Forensic Sci Int 226:81–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shevyrin IV, Melkozerov V, Nevero A, Eltsov O, Morzherin Y, Shafran Y (2013) Identification and analytical properties of new synthetic cannabimimetics bearing 2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropanecarbonyl moiety. Forensic Sci Int 226:62–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tyrkkö E, Pelander A, Ojanperä I (2010) Differentiation of structural isomers in a target drug database by LC/Q-TOFMS using fragmentation prediction. Drug Test Analysis 2:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would thank the EU Commission (JUST/2009/DPIP/AG/0948 and JUST/2011/DPIP/AG/3597) for its financial support for the projects ‘Spice and synthetic cannabinoids’ as well as ‘Spice II Plus’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mira Sundström.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 2.02 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sundström, M., Pelander, A., Angerer, V. et al. A high-sensitivity ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HR-TOFMS) method for screening synthetic cannabinoids and other drugs of abuse in urine. Anal Bioanal Chem 405, 8463–8474 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7272-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7272-8

Keywords

Navigation