Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 405, Issue 26, pp 8397–8408 | Cite as

Conditions for the optimal analysis of volatile organic compounds in air with sorbent tube sampling and liquid standard calibration: demonstration of solvent effect

  • Ki-Hyun Kim
  • Yong-Hyun Kim
  • Richard J. C. Brown
Research Paper

Abstract

The combined use of sorbent tubes (ST) and thermal desorption (TD) has become the common practice for the trace-level analysis of gaseous volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In this research, the potential bias in VOC analysis due to the solvent introduced into the system as a liquid standard (LS) is examined in three stages by analyzing LSs of 19 VOCs in methanol solvent against a three-bed ST (Tenax TA, Carbopack B, and Carboxen 1000). In experimental stage 1, LS made at four concentration levels (between 10 and 150 ng μL−1) were each analyzed at four injection volumes (1, 2, 5, and 10 μL) based on a vaporization method. In experimental stage 2, calibration was also conducted by direct injection over an extended concentration range at two volumes, 1 and 10 μL. In experimental stage 3, the response factors (RF) of a single analyte mass were compared across the four injection volumes and between two injection methods. These results were analyzed to explore the complex relationship between variables such as LS volume, target/solvent chemical type, sorbent strength, and prepurge condition. There was no change in the ST/TD performance up to 2 μL of LS. However, as the injection volume increased up to 5 μL, a notable shift in RF and retention time occurred (e.g., for benzene and methyl ethyl ketone). At the maximum injection volume (10 μL), a significant reduction in sensitivity is evident for all compounds, e.g., 50 % drops relative to 1 μL injection. As such, the TD performance tends to deteriorate with increasing volume of methanol initially loaded on the ST. Although the dominant fraction of solvent was removed by two prepurge steps, residue caught in the strong sorbent fraction is still found to exert an effect on the subsequent analysis, e.g., delayed retention, sensitivity reduction, or disappearance of certain compounds.

Keywords

Thermal desorption Bias Calibration Matrix effect Methanol Prepurge VOC 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (no. 2009-0093848). We also acknowledge partial support made by the Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (no. 20094010200030).

Supplementary material

216_2013_7263_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.7 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1.66 MB).

References

  1. 1.
    Woolfenden EJ (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:2674–2684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Markes International, Ltd. (2007) TDTS (Thermal Desorption Technical Support), note 7: calibration: preparing and introducing thermal desorption standards using sorbent tubesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bagur G, Sanchez-Viñas M, G'azquez D, Ortega M, Romero R (2005) Talanta 66:1168–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang S, Cyronak M, Yang EJ (2007) Pharmaceut Biomed Analysis 43:701–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim Y-H, Kim K-H (2012) Anal Chim Acta 714:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim Y-H, Kim K-H (2012) Anal Chem 84:4126–4139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dincer F, Odabasi M, Muezzinoglu AJ (2006) J Chromatogr A 1122:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karpe P, Kirchner S, Rouxel PJ (1995) J Chromatogr A 708:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saral A, Demir S, Yıldız SJ (2009) J Haz Mater 168:338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pal R, Kim K-H (2008) Anal Chim Acta 610:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim K-H, Nguyen HT (2007) Effects of injection volume change on gas chromatographic sensitivity determined with two contrasting calibration approaches for volatile organic compounds. J Sep Sci 30:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pandey SK, Kim K-H (2009) Comparison of different calibration approaches in the application of thermal desorption technique: a test on gaseous reduced sulfur compounds. Microchem Jour 91:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagata Y (2003) Measurement of odor threshold by triangular odor bag method. Odor measurement review. Japan Ministry of the Environment. Government of Japan. pp. 118–127.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    KMOE (2008) Annual report of ambient air quality in Korea, 2007. Korean Ministry of Environment (KMOE)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ki-Hyun Kim
    • 2
  • Yong-Hyun Kim
    • 2
  • Richard J. C. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Analytical Science DivisionNational Physical LaboratoryTeddingtonUK
  2. 2.Department of Environment & EnergySejong UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations