Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 405, Issue 10, pp 3255–3268 | Cite as

Integrated procedure for multiresidue analysis of dissolved and particulate drugs in municipal wastewater by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

  • Ivan Senta
  • Ivona Krizman
  • Marijan Ahel
  • Senka TerzicEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

For the first time, an integrated procedure for a quantitative multiresidue analysis of dissolved and particulate illicit drug target residues was developed and validated in three different wastewater matrices. The procedure consists of a comprehensive sample enrichment, fractionation and cleanup followed by the determination of target analytes by triple quadrupole liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in both positive and negative ionisation polarities. The enrichment of illicit drugs from suspended solids and aqueous samples was performed using pressurised liquid extraction and solid phase extraction (SPE), respectively. The performance of different SPE cartridges was investigated in order to optimise the overall recovery and to reduce the matrix effects. The optimal results were obtained by combining mixed cation exchange (Oasis MCX) cartridges for fractionated enrichment, weak anion exchange for an additional extract cleanup and optimised chromatographic separation to minimise the impact from co-extracted interferences. The method was applied for the analysis of raw wastewater (RW), activated sludge (AS) and secondary effluent (SE) samples collected at four different wastewater treatment plants. The average contributions of the particulate drugs in the RW and AS were 1–28 and 23–65 %, respectively. This suggested that the total mass loads of some drugs might be underestimated by neglecting the particulate fraction. Moreover, relatively high distribution coefficients, determined for 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (RW = 1211 L/kg) and 11-hydroxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (RW = 1,786 L/kg) implied that adsorption might play a significant role in their overall removal during wastewater treatment.

Figure

Scheme of the integrated analytical protocol for the analyses of particulate and dissolved drug target residues in wastewater

Keywords

Illicit drugs Wastewater LC-MS-MS Dissolved drugs Particulate drugs Partitioning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports (project no. 098-982934-2712). We are grateful to the staff of the wastewater treatment plants of the cities of Zagreb, Velika Gorica, Karlovac and Varazdin for helping with wastewater sampling and providing the data about WWTPs. The technical help of Nenad Muhin is also highly appreciated.

Supplementary material

216_2013_6720_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (236 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 179 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Zuccato E, Castiglioni S (2009) Illicit drugs in the environment. Philos Trans R Soc A 367:3965–3978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huerta-Fontela M, Galceran MT, Martin-Alons J, Ventura F (2008) Occurrence of psychoactive stimulatory drugs in wastewater in north-eastern Spain. Sci Total Environ 397:21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ (2009) The removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters. Water Res 43:363–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Nuijs ALN, Pecceu B, Theunis L, Dubois N, Charlier C, Jorens PG, Bervoets L, Blust R, Neels H, Covaci A (2009) Spatial and temporal variations in the occurrence of cocaine and benzoylecgonine in waste- and surface water from Belgium and removal during wastewater treatment. Water Res 43:1341–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Terzic S, Senta I, Ahel M (2010) Illicit drugs in wastewater of the city of Zagreb (Croatia)—estimation of drug abuse in a transition country. Environ Pollut 158:2686–2693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boleda RM, Galceran T, Ventura F (2009) Monitoring of opiates, cannabinoids and their metabolites in wastewater, surface water and finished water in Catalonia, Spain. Water Res 43:1126–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartelt-Hunt SL, Snow DD, Damon T, Shockley J, Hoagland K (2009) The occurrence of illicit and therapeutic pharmaceuticals in wastewater effluent and surface waters in Nebraska. Environ Pollut 157:786–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huerta-Fontela M, Galceran MT, Ventura F (2008) Stimulatory drugs of abuse in surface waters and their removal in a conventional drinking water treatment plant. Environ Sci Technol 42:6809–6816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Nuijs ALN, Pecceu B, Theunis L, Dubois N, Charlier C, Jorens PG, Bervoets L, Blust R, Neels H, Covaci A (2009) Cocaine and metabolites in waste and surface water across Belgium. Environ Pollut 157:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Postigo C, Lopez de Alda MJ, Viana M, Querol X, AlastueyA AB, Barcelo D (2009) Determination of drugs of abuse in airborne particles by pressurised liquid extraction and liquid chromatography–electrospray–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 81:4382–4388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zuccato E, Chiabrando C, Castiglioni S, Calamari D, Bagnati R, Schiarea S (2005) Cocaine in surface waters: a new evidence-based tool to monitor community drug abuse. Environ Health Global Access Sci Sourc 4:14–20Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zuccato E, Chiabrando C, Castiglioni S, Bagnati R, Fanelli R (2008) Estimating community drug abuse by wastewater analysis. Environ Health Perspect 116:1027–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ (2009) Illicit drugs and pharmaceuticals in the environment—forensic applications of environmental data. Part1: estimation of the usage of drugs in local communities. Environ Pollut 157:1773–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Postigo C, Lopez de Alda MJ, Barcelo D (2010) Drugs of abuse and their metabolites in the Ebro River basin: occurrence in sewage and surface water, sewage treatment plants removal efficiency, and collective drug usage estimation. Environ Int 36:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karolak S, Nefau T, Bailly E, Solgadi A, Levi Y (2010) Estimation of illicit drugs consumption by wastewater analysis in Paris area (France). Forensic Sci Int 200:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Nuijs ALN, Mougel JF, Tarcomnicu I, Bervoets L, Blust R, Jorens PG, Neels H, Covaci A (2011) Sewage epidemiology—a real-time approach to estimate the consumption of illicit drugs in Brussels, Belgium. Environ Int 37:612–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas KV, Bijlsma L, Castiglioni S, Covaci A, Emke E, Grabic R, Hernandez F, Karolak S, Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Lindberg RH, de Alda Lopez M, Meierjohann A, Ort C, Pico Y, Quintana JB, Reid M, Rieckermann J, Terzic S, van Nuijs ALN, de Voogt P (2012) Comparing illicit drug use in 19 European cities through sewage analysis. Sci Total Environ 432:432–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boleda MR, Galceran MT, Ventura F (2007) Trace determination of cannabinoids and opiates an wastewater and surface waters by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1175:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huerta-Fontela M, Galceran MT, Ventura F (2007) Ultraperformance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis of stimulatory drugs of abuse in wastewater and surface waters. Anal Chem 79:3821–3829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Castiglioni S, Zuccato E, Crisci E, Chiabrando C, Fanelli R, Bagnatti R (2006) Identification and measurement of illicit drugs and their metabolites in urban wastewater by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 78:8421–8429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chiaia AC, Banta-Green C, Field J (2008) Eliminating solid phase extraction with large-volume injection LC/MS/MS: analysis of illicit and legal drugs and human urine indicators in US wastewaters. Environ Sci Technol 42:8841–8848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Postigo C, Lopez de Alda M, Barcelo D (2008) Fully automated determination in the low nanogram per liter level of different classes of drugs of abuse in sewage water by on-line solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography–electrospray–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 80:3123–3134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bijlsma L, Sancho JV, Pitarch E, Ibanez M, Hernandez F (2009) Simultaneous ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry determination of amphetamine and amphetamine-like stimulants, cocaine and its metabolites and a cannabis metabolite in surface water and urban wastewater. J Chromatogr A 1216:3078–3089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Nuijs ALN, Tarcomnicu I, Bervoets L, Blust R, Jorens PG, Neels H, Covaci A (2009) Analysis of drugs of abuse in wastewater by hydrophylic interaction liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 395:819–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baker DR, Kasprzyk-Hordern B (2011) Multi-residue analysis of drugs of abuse in wastewater and surface water by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography–positive electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1218:1620–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gonzalez-Marino I, Quintana JB, Rodriguez I, Gonzalez-Diez M, Cela R (2012) Screening and selective quantification of illicit drugs in wastewater by mixed-mode solid-phase extraction and quadrupole-time-of-flight liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 84:1708–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaleta A, Ferdig M, Buchberger W (2006) Semiquantitative determination of residues of amphetamine in sewage sludge samples. J Sep Sci 29:1662–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Metcalfe C, Tindale K, Honxia L, Rodayan A, Yargeau V (2010) Illicit drugs in Canadian municipal wastewater and estimates of community drug use. Environ Pollut 158:3179–3185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baker DR, Kasprzyk-Hordern B (2011) Multi-residue determination of the sorption of illicit drugs and pharmaceuticals to wastewater suspended particulate matter using pressurised liquid extraction, solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1218:7901–7913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    UNODC (2011) United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime World Drug Report 2011. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Khan U, Nicell JA (2012) Sewer epidemiology mass balances for assessing the illicit use of metamphetamine, amphetamine and tetrahydrocannabinol. Sci Total Environ 421–422:144–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Postigo C, Lopez de Alda M, Barcelo D (2008) Analysis of drugs of abuse and their human metabolites in water by LC-MS2: a non-intrusive tool for drug abuse estimation at the community level. Trends Anal Chem 27:1053–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ternes T (1998) Occurrence of drugs in German sewage treatment plants and rivers. Water Res 32:3245–3260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Senta
    • 1
  • Ivona Krizman
    • 1
  • Marijan Ahel
    • 1
  • Senka Terzic
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division for Marine and Environmental ResearchRudjer Boskovic InstituteZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations