Abstract
We present an experimental approach to conducting fast capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry (CE-MS) measurements of very small samples in the nanoliter range. This is achieved by injecting sample very efficiently into a CE-MS system. Injection efficiency represents the ratio of injected sample to the amount of sample needed for carrying out the injection process (v/v). In order to increase this injection efficiency from typical values of 10–3 to 10−7, the concept of capillary batch injection is used to build an automated, small-footprint injection device for CE-MS. This device is capable of running true multi-sample measurement series, using minimal sample volumes and delivering an injection efficiency of up to 100 %. It is compatible with both aqueous and non-aqueous background electrolytes. As an additional benefit, CE-MS separations of a catecholamine model system in capillaries of 15 cm length under conditions of high electric field strength could be accomplished in 20 s with high separation efficiency. This report details design and specifications of the injection device and shows optimal parameter choices for injections with both high injection efficiency and high separation efficiency. Furthermore, a procedure is presented to coat the tip of a fused silica capillary with a silicone elastomer which acts as a seal between two capillaries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BGE:
-
Background electrolyte
- CBI:
-
Capillary batch injection
- CE:
-
Capillary electrophoresis
- ESI:
-
Electrospray ionization
- ID:
-
Inner diameter
- MS:
-
Mass spectrometry
- TOF-MS:
-
Time-of-flight mass spectrometry
References
Kubáň P, Hauser PC (2011) Electrophoresis 32:30–42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201000354
Pantůčková P, Gebauer P, Boček P, Křivánková L (2011) Electrophoresis 32:43–51, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201000382
Ramautar R, Mayboroda OA, Somsen GW, de Jong GJ (2011) Electrophoresis 32:52–65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201000378
Haselberg R, de Jong GJ, Somsen GW (2011) Electrophoresis 32:66–82, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201000364
Lazar IM, Lee ED, Rockwood AL, Lee ML (1998) J Chromatogr A 829:279–288, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00743-2
Hjerten S, Valtcheva L, Elenbring K, Liao JL (1995) Electrophoresis 16:584 – 594, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150160195
Zhong M, Lunte S (1996) Anal Chem 68:2488 – 2493, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac951238m
Müller O, Minarik M, Foret F (1998) Electrophoresis 19:1436 – 1444, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150190838
Matysik FM (2010) Anal Bioanal Chem 397:961–965, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3586-y
Jankowski JA, Tracht S, Sweedler JV (1995) Trends Anal Chem 14:170–176, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-9936(95)98315-Y
Blasco S, Kortz L, Matysik FM (2009) Electrophoresis 30:1–6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.200900324
Grundmann M, Matysik FM (2011) Anal Bioanal Chem 400:269–278, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4719-7
Grundmann M, Rothenhöfer M, Bernhardt G, Buschauer A, Matysik FM (2011) Anal Bioanal Chem 402:2617–2623, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5254-2
Kennedy RT, Watson CJ, Haskins WE, Powell DH, Strecker RE (2002) Curr Opin Chem Biol 6:659–665, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00373-3
Perry M, Li Q, Kennedy RT (2009) Anal Chim Acta 653:1–22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.08.038
Hogan BL, Lunte SM, Stobaugh JF, Lunte CE (1994) Anal Chem 66:596–602, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac00077a004
Bowser MT, Kennedy RT (2001) Electrophoresis 22:3668–3676, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1522-2683(200109)22:17<3668::AID-ELPS3668>3.0.CO;2-M
Lapainis T, Sweedler JV (2008) J Chromatogr A 1184:144–158, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.10.098
Kubáň P, Engström A, Olsson JC, Thorsén G, Tryzell R, Karlberg B (1997) Anal Chim Acta 337:117–124, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00339-X
Tůma P, Opekar F, Jelínek I (2000) J Chromatogr A 883:223–230, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00446-5
Fang ZL, Liu ZS, Shen Q (1997) Anal Chim Acta 346:135–143, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(97)00082-2
Fang ZL, Fang Q (2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 370:978–983, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002160100793
Fu CG, Fang ZL (2000) Anal Chim Acta 422:71–79, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01057-6
Cao XD, Fang Q, Fang ZL (2004) Anal Chim Acta 513:473–479, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.03.028
Opekar F, Coufal P, Štulík K (2009) Chem Rev 109:4487 – 4499, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr900018r
Matysik FM (2006) Electrochem Commun 8:1011–1015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2006.04.009
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the glass, mechanical, and electronic workshops at the University of Regensburg for their assistance in implementing the experimental setup. Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MA 1401/7-1) is gratefully acknowledged. This research was supported by the Research Executive Agency (REA) of the European Union under Grant Agreement number PITN-GA-2010-264772 (ITN CHEBANA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grundmann, M., Matysik, FM. Analyzing small samples with high efficiency: capillary batch injection–capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 404, 1713–1721 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6282-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6282-2