Skip to main content

A PLS model based on dominant factor for coal analysis using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Abstract

Thirty-three bituminous coal samples were utilized to test the application of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy technique for coal elemental concentration measurement in the air. The heterogeneity of the samples and the pyrolysis or combustion of coal during the laser–sample interaction processes were analyzed to be the main reason for large fluctuation of detected spectra and low calibration quality. Compared with the generally applied normalization with the whole spectral area, normalization with segmental spectral area was found to largely improve the measurement precision and accuracy. The concentrations of major element C in coal were determined by a novel partial least squares (PLS) model based on dominant factor. Dominant C concentration information was taken from the carbon characteristic line intensity since it contains the most-related information, even if not accurately. This dominant factor model was further improved by inducting non-linear relation by partially modeling the inter-element interference effect. The residuals were further corrected by PLS with the full spectrum information. With the physical-principle-based dominant factor to calculate the main quantitative information and to partially explicitly include the non-linear relation, the proposed PLS model avoids the overuse of unrelated noise to some extent and becomes more robust over a wider C concentration range. Results show that RMSEP in the proposed PLS model decreased to 4.47% from 5.52% for the conventional PLS with full spectrum input, while R 2 remained as high as 0.999, and RMSEC&P was reduced from 3.60% to 2.92%, showing the overall improvement of the proposed PLS model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. 1.

    Bustamante MF, Rinaldi CA, Ferrero JC (2002) Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy characterization of Ca in a soil depth profile. Spectrochim Acta B 57:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki P, Anglos D, Kilikoglou V, Zafiropulos V (2001) Compositional characterization of encrustation on marble with laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta B 56:887–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rials TG, Kelley SS, So CL (2002) Use of advanced spectroscopic techniques for predicting the mechanical properties of wood composites. Wood Fiber Sci 34:398–407

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pandhija S, Rai AK (2008) Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: a versatile tool for monitoring traces in materials. Pramana J Phys 70:553–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gomba JM, D’Angelo C, Bertuccelli D, Bertuccelli G (2001) Spectroscopic characterization of laser-induced breakdown in aluminum-lithium alloy samples for quantitative determination of traces. Spectrochim Acta B 56:695–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lee WB, Wu JY, Lee YI, Sneddon J (2004) Recent applications of laser-induced breakdown spectrometry: a review of material approaches. Appl Spectrosc Rev 39:27–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Li J, Lu J, Lin Z, Gong S, Xie C, Chang L, Yang L, Li P (2009) Effects of experimental parameters on elemental analysis of coal by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Opt Laser Technol 41:907–913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Taschuk MT, Tsui YY, Fedosejevs R (2006) Detection and mapping of latent fingerprints by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 60:1322–1327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Beldjilali S, Borivent D, Mercadier L, Mothe E, Clair G, Hermann J (2010) Evaluation of minor element concentrations in potatoes using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta B 65:727–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Feng J, Wang Z, Li Z, Ni W (2010) Study to reduce laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy measurement uncertainty using plasma characteristic parameters. Spectrochim Acta B 65:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang L, Dong L, Dou H, Yin W, Jia S (2008) Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for determination of the organic oxygen content in anthracite coal under atmospheric conditions. Appl Spectrosc 62:458–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yin W, Zhang L, Dong L, Ma W, Jia S (2009) Design of a laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy system for on-line quality analysis of pulverized coal in power plants. Appl Spectrosc 63:865–872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wallis FJ, Chadwick BL, Morrison RJS (2000) Analysis of lignite using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 54:1231–1235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Body D, Chadwick BL (2001) Optimization of the spectral data processing in a LIBS simultaneous elemental analysis system. Spectrochim Acta B 56:725–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Blevins LG, Shaddix CR, Sickafoose SM, Walsh PM (2003) Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy at high temperatures in industrial boilers and furnaces. Appl Opt 42:6107–6118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ctvrtnickova T, Mateo MP, Yanez A, Nicolas G (2010) Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy application for ash characterization for a coal fired power plant. Spectrochim Acta B 65:734–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ctvrtnickova T, Mateo MP, Yanez A, Nicolas G (2009) Characterization of coal fly ash components by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta B 64:1093–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gaft M, Sapir-Sofer I, Modiano H, Stana R (2007) Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy for bulk minerals online analyses. Spectrochim Acta B 62:1496–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gaft M, Dvir E, Modiano H, Schone U (2008) Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy machine for online ash analyses in coal. Spectrochim Acta B 63:1177–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mateo MP, Nicolas G, Yanez A (2007) Characterization of inorganic species in coal by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy using UV and IR radiations. Appl Surf Sci 254:868–872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Romero CE, De Saro R, Craparo J, Weisberg A, Moreno R, Yao Z (2010) Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for coal characterization and assessing slagging propensity. Energy Fuels 24:510–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Noda M, Deguchi Y, Iwasaki S, Yoshikawa N (2002) Detection of carbon content in a high-temperature and high-pressure environment using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta B 57:701–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Burakov VS, Tarasenko NV, Nedelko MI, Kononov VA, Vasilev NN, Isakov SN (2009) Analysis of lead and sulfur in environmental samples by double pulse laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta B 64:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yu L, Lu J, Xie C, Chen W, Wu G, Shen K, Feng W (2005) Analysis of pulverized coal by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Plasma Sci Technol 7:3041–3044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Clegg SM, Sklute E, Dyar MD, Barefield JE, Wiens RC (2009) Multivariate analysis of remote laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy spectra using partial least squares, principal component analysis, and related techniques. Spectrochim Acta B 64:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fink H, Panne U, Niessner R (2002) Process analysis of recycled thermoplasts from consumer electronics by laser-induced plasma spectroscopy. Anal Chem 74:4334–4342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sirven JB, Bousquet B, Canioni L, Sarger L (2006) Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of composite samples: comparison of advanced chemometrics methods. Anal Chem 78:1462–1469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Amador-Hernandez J, Garcia-Ayuso LE, Fernandez-Romero JM, Luque De Castro MD (2000) Partial least squares regression for problem solving in precious metal analysis by laser induced breakdown spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 15:587–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Freedman A, Iannarilli FJ, Wormhoudt JC (2005) Aluminum alloy analysis using microchip-laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta B 60:1076–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Braga JWB, Trevizan LC, Nunes LC, Rufini IA, Santos D, Krug FJ (2010) Comparison of univariate and multivariate calibration for the determination of micronutrients in pellets of plant materials by laser induced breakdown spectrometry. Spectrochim Acta B 65:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Miziolek AW, Palleschi V, Schechter I (2006) Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wold S, Sjostrom M, Eriksson L (2001) PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 58:109–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang Z, Feng J, Li L, Ni W, Li Z (2010) A novel multivariate model based on dominant factor for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy measurements, arXiv:1012.2735v1 [physics.optics]

  34. 34.

    Aragon C, Aguilera JA, Penalba F (1999) Improvements in quantitative analysis of steel composition by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy at atmospheric pressure using an infrared Nd: YAG laser. Appl Spectrosc 53:1259–1267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the governmental “863” project (NO. 20091860346) and “973” project (NO. 2010CB227006).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Li.

Additional information

Published in the special issue Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy with Guest Editors Jagdish P. Singh, Jose Almirall, Mohamad Sabsabi, and Andrzej Miziolek.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 1497 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, J., Wang, Z., West, L. et al. A PLS model based on dominant factor for coal analysis using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 400, 3261–3271 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4865-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
  • Bituminous coal
  • Dominant factor
  • Partial least squares