Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of possible marker peptides for the detection of major ruminant milk proteins in food by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work was the determination of peptides, which can function as markers for identification of milk allergens in food samples. Emphasis was placed on two casein proteins (α- and β-casein) and two whey proteins (α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin). In silico tryptic digestion provided preliminary information about the expected peptides. After tryptic digestion of four milk allergens, the analytical data obtained by combination of reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography and quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) led to the identification of 26 peptides. Seven of these peptides were synthesized and used for calibration of the LC-MS/MS system. Species specificity of the selected peptides was sought by BLAST search. Among the selected peptides, only LIVTQTMK from β-lactoglobulin (m/z 467.6, charge 2+) was found to be cow milk specific and could function as a marker. Two other peptides, FFVAPFPEVFGK from α-casein (m/z 693.3, charge 2+) and GPFPIIV from β-casein (m/z 742.5, charge 1+), occur in water buffalo milk too. The other four peptides appear in the milk of other species also and can be used as markers for ruminant species milk. Using these seven peptides, a multianalyte MS-based method was developed. For the establishment of the method, it was applied at first to different dairy samples, and then to chocolate and blank samples, and the peptides could be determined down to 1 ng/mL in food samples. At the end, spiked samples were measured, where the target peptides could be detected with a high recovery (over 50%).

Possible marker peptides from four milk allergens for the detection of ruminant milk proteins

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wal JM (2004) Bovine milk allergenicity. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 93(5 Suppl):S2–S11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber D, Raymond P, Ben-Rejeb S, Lau B (2006) Development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method using capillary liquid chromatography and nanoelectrospray ionization-quadrupole time-of-flight hybrid mass spectrometer for the detection of milk allergens. J Agric Food Chem 54(5):1604–1610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chatchatee P, Järvinen KM, Bardina L, Vila L, Beyer K, Sampson HA (2001) Identification of IgE and IgG binding epitopes on β- and κ-casein in cow's milk allergic patients. Clin Exp Allergy 31(8):1256–1262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Monaci L, Tregoat V, van Hengel AJ, Anklam E (2006) Milk allergens, their characteristics and their detection in food: a review. Eur Food Res Technol 223(2):149–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sélo I, Clément G, Bernard H, Chatel JM, Créminon C, Peltre G, Wal JM (1999) Allergy to bovine β-lactoglobulin: specificity of human IgE to tryptic peptides. Clin Exp Allergy 29(8):1055–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wal JM (2001) Structure and function of milk allergens. Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol 56(67 Suppl):35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monaci L, van Hengel AJ (2008) Development of a method for the quantitation of whey allergen traces in mixed-fruit juices based on liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogr A 1192(1):113–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blanc F, Bernard H, Alessandri S, Bublin M, Paty E, Leung SA, Patient KA, Wal JM (2008) Update on optimized purification and characterization of natural milk allergens. Mol Nutr Food Res 52(suppl 2):S166–S175

    Google Scholar 

  9. Poms RE, Klein CL, Anklam E (2004) Methods for allergen analysis in food: a review. Food Addit Contam 21(1):1–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Monaci L, Visconti A (2009) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics methods for analysis of food allergens. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 28(5):581–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Hengel AJ (2007) Food allergen detection methods and the challenge to protect food-allergic consumers. Anal Bioanal Chem 389(1):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Léonil J, Gagnaire V, Mollé D, Pezennec S, Bouhallab S (2000) Application of chromatography and mass spectrometry to the characterization of food proteins and derived peptides. J Chromatogr A 881(1–2):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wehr T (2006) Top-down versus bottom-up approaches in proteomics. LC GC N Am 24(9):1004–1010

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trujillo AJ, Casals I, Guamis B (2000) Analysis of major ovine milk proteins by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and flow injection analysis with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 870(1–2):371–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hau J, Bovetto L (2001) Characterisation of modified whey protein in milk ingredients by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 926(1):105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cocco RR, Järvinen KM, Sampson HA, Beyer K (2003) Mutational analysis of major, sequential IgE-binding epitopes in αs1-casein, a major cow's milk allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol 112(2):433–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fenaille F, Parisod V, Tabet J-C, Guy PA (2005) Carbonylation of milk powder proteins as a consequence of processing conditions. Proteomics 5:3097–3104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Monaci L, Losito I, Palmisano F, Visconti A (2010) Identification of allergenic milk proteins markers in fined white wines by capillary liquid chromatography—electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1217(26):4300–4305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Monaci L, Nørgaard JV, van Hengel AJ (2010) Feasibility of a capillary LC/ESI-Q-TOF MS method for the detection of milk allergens in an incurred model food matrix. Anal Methods 2(7):967–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. In-solution digestion. Available at http://www.osa.sunysb.edu/Proteomics/ProteinDigestPrep.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2008

  21. PeptideMass. Available at http://www.expasy.org/tools/peptide-mass.html. First accessed 20 Sept 2008

  22. PFIA. Available at http://hodgkin.mbu.iisc.ernet.in/~pfia/. First accessed 30 Nov 2008

  23. BLAST. Available at http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi. First accessed 28 Oct 2008

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Christian Doppler Research Association and RomerLabs for funding the Christian Doppler Laboratory ‘Rapid Test Systems for Allergenic Food Contaminants’. We thank also the government of Lower Austria for financial supporting of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Baumgartner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ansari, P., Stoppacher, N., Rudolf, J. et al. Selection of possible marker peptides for the detection of major ruminant milk proteins in food by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 399, 1105–1115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4422-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4422-0

Keywords

Navigation