Skip to main content

A digital microfluidic approach to heterogeneous immunoassays

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry volume 399, pages 337–345 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

A digital microfluidic (DMF) device was applied to a heterogeneous sandwich immunoassay. The digital approach to microfluidics manipulates samples and reagents in the form of discrete droplets, as opposed to the streams of fluid used in microchannels. Since droplets are manipulated on relatively generic 2-D arrays of electrodes, DMF devices are straightforward to use, and are reconfigurable for any desired combination of droplet operations. This flexibility makes them suitable for a wide range of applications, especially those requiring long, multistep protocols such as immunoassays. Here, we developed an immunoassay on a DMF device using Human IgG as a model analyte. To capture the analyte, an anti-IgG antibody was physisorbed on the hydrophobic surface of a DMF device, and DMF actuation was used for all washing and incubation steps. The bound analyte was detected using FITC-labeled anti-IgG, and fluorescence after the final wash was measured in a fluorescence plate reader. A non-ionic polymer surfactant, Pluronic F-127, was added to sample and detection antibody solutions to control non-specific binding and aid in movement via DMF. Sample and reagent volumes were reduced by nearly three orders of magnitude relative to conventional multiwell plate methods. Since droplets are in constant motion, the antibody–antigen binding kinetics is not limited by diffusion, and total analysis times were reduced to less than 2.5 h per assay. A multiplexed device comprising several DMF platforms wired in series further increased the throughput of the technique. A dynamic range of approximately one order of magnitude was achieved, with reproducibility similar to the assay when performed in a 96-well plate. In bovine serum samples spiked with human IgG, the target molecule was successfully detected in the presence of a 100-fold excess of bovine IgG. It was concluded that the digital microfluidic format is capable of carrying out qualitative and quantitative sandwich immunoassays with a dramatic reduction in reagent usage and analysis time compared to macroscale methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Cartwright PS, Victory DF, Wong SW, Dao AH (1985) Evaluation of the new generation of urinary pregnancy tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:730–731

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Voller A, Huldt G, Thors C, Engvall E (1975) New serological test for malaria antibodies. Br Med J 1:659–661

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wadkins R, Golden J, Pritsiolas L, Ligler F (1998) Detection of multiple toxic agents using a planar array immunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 13:407–415

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McBride MT, Gammon S, Pitesky M, O’Brien TW, Smith T, Aldrich J, Langlois RG, Colston B, Venkateswaran KS (2003) Multiplexed liquid arrays for simultaneous detection of simulants of biological warfare agents. Anal Chem 75:1924–1930

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ng AHC, Uddayasankar U, Wheeler AR (2010) Immunoassays in microfluidic systems. Anal Bioanal Chem 397:991–1007

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller EM, Wheeler AR (2009) Digital bioanalysis. Anal Bioanal Chem 393(2):419–426

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wheeler AR (2008) Chemistry. Putting electrowetting to work. Science 322:539–540

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho SK, Moon HJ, Kim CJ (2003) Creating, transporting, cutting, and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. J Microelectromechanical Syst 12:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barbulovic-Nad I, Au S, Wheeler AR (2010) A digital microfluidic platform for complete cell culture. Lab Chip 10:1536–1542

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbulovic-Nad I, Yang H, Park PS, Wheeler AR (2008) Digital microfluidics for cell-based assays. Lab Chip 8:519–526

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malic L, Veres T, Tabrizian M (2009) Biochip functionalization using electrowetting-on-dielectric digital microfluidics for surface plasmon resonance imaging detection of DNA hybridization. Biosens Bioelectron 24:2218–2224

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdelgawad M, Wheeler AR (2008) All-terrain droplet actuation. Lab Chip 8:672–677

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang YH, Lee GB, Huang FC, Chen YY, Lin JL (2006) Integrated polymerase chain reaction chips utilizing digital microfluidics. Biomed Microdevices 8:215–225

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y-J, Yao D-J, Lin H-C, Chang W-Y, Chang H-Y (2008) DNA ligation of ultramicro volume using an EWOD microfluidic system with coplanar electrodes. J Micromech Microeng 18:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Malic L, Veres T, Tabrizian M (2009) Two-dimensional droplet-based surface plasmon resonance imaging using electrowetting-on-dielectric microfluidics. Lab Chip 9:473–475

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mousa NA, Jebrail MJ, Yang H, Abdelgawad M, Metalnikov P, Chen J, Wheeler AR, Casper RF (2009) Droplet-scale estrogen assays in breast tissue, blood, and serum. Sci Transl Med 1:1ra2

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luk VN, Wheeler AR (2009) A digital microfluidic approach to proteomic sample processing. Anal Chem 81:4524–4530

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chatterjee D, Ytterberg AJ, Son SU, Loo JA, Garrell RL (2010) Integration of protein processing steps on a droplet microfluidics platform for MALDI-MS analysis. Anal Chem 82:2095–2101

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moon H, Wheeler AR, Garrell RL, Loo JA, Kim CJ (2006) An integrated digital microfluidic chip for multiplexed proteomic sample preparation and analysis by MALDI-MS. Lab Chip 6:1213–1219

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wheeler AR, Moon H, Bird CA, Loo RR, Kim CJ, Loo JA, Garrell RL (2005) Digital microfluidics with in-line sample purification for proteomics analyses with MALDI-MS. Anal Chem 77:534–540

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wheeler AR, Moon H, Kim CJ, Loo JA, Garrell RL (2004) Electrowetting-based microfluidics for analysis of peptides and proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 76:4833–4838

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller EM, Wheeler AR (2008) A digital microfluidic approach to homogeneous enzyme assays. Anal Chem 80:1614–1619

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Fair RB (2004) An integrated digital microfluidic lab-on-a-chip for clinical diagnostics on human physiological fluids. Lab Chip 4:310–315

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Fair RB (2004) Droplet-based microfluidic lab-on-a-chip for glucose detection. Anal Chim Acta 507:145–150

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rastogi V, Velev OD (2007) Development and evaluation of realistic microbioassays in freely suspended droplets on a chip. Biomicrofluidics 1:014107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sista R, Hua Z, Thwar P, Sudarsan A, Srinivasan V, Eckhardt AE, Pollack MG, Pamula VK (2008) Development of a digital microfluidic platform for point of care testing. Lab Chip 8:2091–2104

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sista R, Eckhardt AE, Srinivasan V, Pollack MG, Palanki S, Pamula VK (2008) Heterogeneous immunoassays using magnetic beads on a digital microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 8:2188–2196

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Amplex® ELISA development kit for mouse IgG with Amplex® UltraRed reagent (Manual) (2009) http://probes.invitrogen.com/media/pis/mp33851.pdf. Accessed 14 Jun 2010

  29. Luk V, Mo GC, Wheeler AR (2008) Pluronic additives: a solution to sticky problems in digital microfluidics. Langmuir 24:6382–6389

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdelgawad M, Watson MWL, Wheeler AR (2009) Hybrid microfluidics: a digital-to-channel interface for in-line sample processing and chemical separations. Lab Chip 9:1046–1051

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Beck OE, Kaiser PE (1981) Nephelometry of human IgG subclass concentration in serum. Clin Chem 27:310–313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Campbell J, Russell L, Crenshaw J, Weaver E, Godden S, Quigley J, Coverdale J, Tyler H (2007) Impact of irradiation and immunoglobulin G concentration on absorption of protein and immunoglobulin G in calves fed colostrum replacer. J Dairy Sci 90:5726–5731

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St George St., Toronto, ON, M5S 3H6, Canada

    Elizabeth M. Miller, Uvaraj Uddayasankar & Aaron R. Wheeler

  2. Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, 164 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G9, Canada

    Alphonsus H. C. Ng & Aaron R. Wheeler

  3. Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, 160 College St., Toronto, ON, M5S 3E1, Canada

    Elizabeth M. Miller, Alphonsus H. C. Ng, Uvaraj Uddayasankar & Aaron R. Wheeler

Authors
  1. Elizabeth M. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alphonsus H. C. Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Uvaraj Uddayasankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aaron R. Wheeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron R. Wheeler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, E.M., Ng, A.H.C., Uddayasankar, U. et al. A digital microfluidic approach to heterogeneous immunoassays. Anal Bioanal Chem 399, 337–345 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4368-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4368-2

Keywords

  • Digital microfluidics
  • Immunoassay
  • Electrowetting