Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 396, Issue 4, pp 1433–1439 | Cite as

Stability of Se species in plant extracts rich in phenolic substances

  • Petra Cuderman
  • Vekoslava Stibilj
Original Paper

Abstract

Since there is growing awareness of the strong dependence of the antioxidative function of selenium (Se) upon its chemical form, the stability of Se species during sample preparation is an important factor in obtaining qualitative and quantitative results. Many plant samples are rich in phenolic compounds (antioxidants), but data about their effect on specific Se species in extracts of plant samples are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the most common phenolic substances in plant parts, namely tannin and the flavonoid rutin, on the concentration and/or transformation of several Se species (SeMet, SeCys2, SeMeSeCys, Se(VI) and Se(IV)) during sample preparation (24 h incubation at 37 °C) and storage (4 days at 4 °C). Moreover, the effect observed was then studied in a real sample, buckwheat, because this plant is known as a rich source of phenolics, especially tannin and rutin. Se speciation was carried out by on-line coupling of ion-exchange HPLC-ICP-MS after water and enzymatic (protease) hydrolysis. The results showed that the ratio between the two antioxidants has an important role. When the antioxidants were present together, the response for Se(IV) was observed to start to decrease only at a ratio of rutin to tannin of 1:100 (w/w), indicating the ratio between antioxidants in buckwheat seeds. After water extraction, only 40% and after enzymatic extraction 80% of Se(IV) remained, but no other Se compound was detected with the system used. Furthermore, the extracts were not stable during storage at 4 °C. Signals for other Se species were stable. The results obtained for buckwheat seeds showed a decrease in Se(IV) response during sample preparation and storage, comparable to the one obtained with the experiments performed in vitro. However, Se species in extracts of other buckwheat parts (leaves, stems and sprouts) were stable. These results indicate that reactions in the extraction process and during storage may affect Se speciation and may result in misidentifications and inaccurate values.

Keywords

Se species Phenolic substances Stability Buckwheat HPLC-ICP-MS Trace elements Quality assurance/control Biological samples 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency through the programme P1-0143, contract 1000-05-310030 and project J7-9805. The authors would like to thank Prof. Ivan Kreft for donating the buckwheat seeds and Miss Maja Vogričič for milling them.

References

  1. 1.
    Kreft I, Fabjan N (2006) Yasumoto K 98:508–512Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wach A, Pyrzynska K, Biesega M (2007) Food Chem 100:699–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ožbolt L, Kreft S, Kreft I, Germ M, Stibilj V (2008) Food Chem 110:691–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Silva BA, Malva OJ, Dias CPA (2008) Food Chemistry 110:611–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Munoz Olivas R, Quevauviller P, FX Donard O (1998) J Anal Chem 360:512–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gomez Ariza JL, Morales E, Sanchez-Rodas D, Giraldez I (2000) Trends Anal Chem 19:200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindemann T, Prange A, Dannecker W, Neidhart B (2000) J Anal Chem 368:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moreno P, Quijano MA, Gutierrez AM, Perez-Conde MC, Camara C (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 374:466–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pyrzynska K (2002) Microchimica Acta 140:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roberge MT, Borgerding AJ, Finley JW (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:4191–4197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palacios O, Lobinski R (2007) Talanta 71:1813–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mazej D, Falnoga I, Veber M, Stibilj V (2006) Talanta 68:558–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smrkolj P, Osvald M, Osvald J, Stibilj V (2007) Eur Food Res Technol 225:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polatajko A, Jakubowski N, Szpunar J (2006) J Anal At Spectrom 21:639–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pedrero Z, Madrid Y (2009) Anal Chim Acta 634:135–152. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.12.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naczk M, Shahidi F (2004) J Chromatogr 1054:95–111Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naczk M, Shahidi F (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:1523–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luthar Z (1992) Fagopyrum 12:36–42Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salunkhe DK, Chavan JK, Kadam SS (1989) Dietary tannins: consequences and remedies. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steadman KJ, Burgoon MS, Lewis BA, Edwardson SE, Obendorf RL (2001) J Sci Food Agric 81:1094–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luthar Z, Kreft I (1999) Fagopyrum 16:61–65Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kreft S, Knapp M, Kreft I (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:4649–4652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holasova M, Smrcinova FH, Orsak M, Lachman J, Vavreinova S (2002) Food Res Int 35:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fabjan N, Rode J, Košir IJ, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Kreft I (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:6452–6455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim SJ, Zaidul ISM, Suzuki T, Mukasa Y, Hashimoto N, Takigawa S, Noda T, Matsuura-Endo C, Yamauchi H (2008) Food Chem 110:814–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eggum BO, Kreft I, Javornik B (1981) Qual Plant Plant Foods Hum Nutr 30:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vogrinčič M, Cuderman P, Kreft I, Stibilj V (2007) Analytical Sciences 25:1357–1363Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cuderman P, Ožbolt L, Kreft I, Stibilj V (2009) Food Chemistry (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cuderman P, Kreft I, Germ M, Kovačevič M, Stibilj V (2008) J Agric Food Chem 56:9114–9120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smrkolj P, Stibilj V, Kreft I, Kapolna E (2005) Analytical Sciences 21:1501–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rayman MP (2000) Lancet 356:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ellis DR, Salt DE (2003) Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smrkolj P, Stibilj V (2004) Anal Chim Acta 512:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kreft S, Štrukelj B, Gaberščik A, Kreft I (2002) J Exp Bot 53:1801–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kitaguchi T, Ogra Y, Iwashita Y, Suzuki TK (2008) Eur Food Res Technol 227:1455–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations