Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On optical depth profiling using confocal Raman spectroscopy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Until 2006 the performance of confocal Raman spectroscopy depth profiling was typically described and modeled through the application of geometrical optics, including refraction at the surface, to explain the degree of resolution and the precise form of the depth profile obtained from transparent and semicrystalline materials. Consequently a range of techniques, physical and analytical, was suggested to avoid the errors thus encountered in order to improve the practice of Raman spectroscopy, if not the understanding of the underlying mechanisms. These approaches were completely unsuccessful in accounting for the precise form of the depth profile, the fact that spectra obtained from laminated samples always contain characteristic peaks from all materials present both well above and below the focal point and that spectra can be obtained when focused some 40 μm above the sample surface. This paper provides further evidence that the physical processes underlying Raman spectroscopy are better modeled and explained through the concept of an extended illuminated volume contributing to the final Raman spectrum and modeled through a photon scattering approach rather than a point focus ray optics approach. The power of this numerical model lies in its ability to incorporate, simultaneously, the effects of degree of refraction at the surface (whether using a dry or oil objective lens), the degree of attenuation due to scatter by the bulk of the material, the Raman scattering efficiency of the material, and surface roughness effects. Through this we are now able to explain why even removing surface aberration and refraction effects through the use of oil immersion objective lenses cannot reliably ensure that the material sampled is only that at or close to the point of focus of the laser. Furthermore we show that the precise form of the depth profile is affected by the degree of flatness of the surface of the sample. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that the degree of flatness of the material surface is, in fact, more important than obtaining a precise refractive index match between the immersion oil and the material when seeking a high-quality depth profile or Raman spectrum from within a transparent or semicrystalline material, contrary to accepted norms that samples for interrogation by Raman spectroscopy require little preparation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson T (1994) Confocal microscopy. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tabaksblat R, Meier RJ, Kip BJ (1992) Confocal Raman microspectroscopy: theory and application to thin polymer samples. Appl Spectrosc 46(1):60–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hajatdoost S, Olsthoorn M, Yarwood J (1997) Depth profiling study of effect of annealing temperature on polymer/polymer interfaces in laminates using confocal Raman microspectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 51(12):1784–1790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mura C, Yarwood J, Swart R, Hodge D (2000) Raman microscopic studies of the distribution of the fungicide fluorfolpet in plasticised PVC films. Polymer 41:8659–8671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eaton P, Holmes P, Yarwood J (2000) A IR/FT-IR and Raman microscopic investigation of diffusion of silane coupling agents in PVC films. Appl Spectrosc 54(4):508–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sammon C, Mura C, Eaton P, Yarwood J (2000) Raman microscopic studies of polymer surfaces and interfaces. Analusis 28(1):30–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Everall NJ (2000) Modelling and measuring the effect of refraction on the depth resolution of confocal Raman microscopy. Appl Spectrosc 54(6):773–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Everall NJ (2000) Confocal Raman microscopy: why the depth resolution and spatial accuracy can be much worse than you think. Appl Spectrosc 54(10):1515–1520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vyorykka J, Halttunen M, Iitti H, Tenhunen J, Vuorinen T, Stenius P (2002) Characteristics of immersion sampling techniques in confocal Raman depth profiling. Appl Spectrosc 56(6):776–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomba PJ, Paster JM (2008) Avoiding coupling fluid-sample interaction in confocal Raman depth profiling with immersion objectives. Appl Spectrosc 62(7):817–819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Michielsen S (2001) Aberrations in confocal spectroscopy of polymeric materials: erroneous thickness and intensities and loss of resolution. J Appl Polym Sci 81:1662–1669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baia L, Gigant K, Posset U, Schottner G, Keifer W, Popp J (2002) Confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy: theory and application to a hybrid polymer coating. Appl Spectrosc 56(4):536–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baia L, Gigant K, Posset U, Schottner G, Keifer W, Popp J (2002) Confocal Raman investigations on hybrid polymer coatings. Vib Spectrosc 29:245–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baldwin KJ, Batchelder DN (2001) Confocal Raman microspectroscopy through a planar interface. Appl Spectrosc 55(5):517–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruneel JL, Lassegues JC, Sourisseau C (2002) In-depth analysis by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: experimental features and modelling of the refraction effects. J Raman Spectrosc 33:815–828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Macdonald AM, Vaughan AS, Wyeth P (2005) On confocal Raman spectroscopy of semicrystalline polymers: the effect of optical scattering. Appl Spectrosc 37(12):1475–1481

    Google Scholar 

  17. Macdonald AM, Vaughan AS, Wyeth P (2005) Application of confocal Raman spectroscopy to thin polymer layers on highly scattering substrates: a case study of synthetic adhesives on historic textiles. J Raman Spectrosc 36(3):185–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pelletier MJ (2009) Control of out-of focus light intensity in confocal Raman microspectroscopy using optical preprocessing. Appl Spectrosc 65(6):591–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Macdonald AM, Vaughan AS (2007) Numerical simulations of confocal Raman spectroscopic depth profiles of polymers: a photon scattering approach. J Raman Spectrosc 38(5):584–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kroschwitz J (1990) Concise encyclopedia of polymer science and engineering. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang JB, Dou Q (2009) Polypropylene/linear low-density polyethylene blends: morphology, crystal structure, optical, and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 111(1):194–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dash WC, Newman R (1995) Phys Rev 99:1151–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bower DI, Maddams WF (1980) The vibrational spectroscopy of polymers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  24. Everall N (2004) Depth profiling with confocal Raman microscopy, part II. Spectroscopy 19(11):16–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bridges TE, Houline MP, Harris JM (2004) Spatially resolved analysis of small particles by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: depth profiling and optical trapping. Anal Chem 76(3):576–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Everall N (2008) The influence of out-of-focus sample regions on the surface specificity of confocal Raman microscopy. Appl Spectros 62(6):591–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Cargille Oils for provision of oils and to Celia Yeung for her contribution to the exploratory work on this topic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Vaughan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freebody, N.A., Vaughan, A.S. & Macdonald, A.M. On optical depth profiling using confocal Raman spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 396, 2813–2823 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3272-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3272-0

Keywords

Navigation