Abstract
Until 2006 the performance of confocal Raman spectroscopy depth profiling was typically described and modeled through the application of geometrical optics, including refraction at the surface, to explain the degree of resolution and the precise form of the depth profile obtained from transparent and semicrystalline materials. Consequently a range of techniques, physical and analytical, was suggested to avoid the errors thus encountered in order to improve the practice of Raman spectroscopy, if not the understanding of the underlying mechanisms. These approaches were completely unsuccessful in accounting for the precise form of the depth profile, the fact that spectra obtained from laminated samples always contain characteristic peaks from all materials present both well above and below the focal point and that spectra can be obtained when focused some 40 μm above the sample surface. This paper provides further evidence that the physical processes underlying Raman spectroscopy are better modeled and explained through the concept of an extended illuminated volume contributing to the final Raman spectrum and modeled through a photon scattering approach rather than a point focus ray optics approach. The power of this numerical model lies in its ability to incorporate, simultaneously, the effects of degree of refraction at the surface (whether using a dry or oil objective lens), the degree of attenuation due to scatter by the bulk of the material, the Raman scattering efficiency of the material, and surface roughness effects. Through this we are now able to explain why even removing surface aberration and refraction effects through the use of oil immersion objective lenses cannot reliably ensure that the material sampled is only that at or close to the point of focus of the laser. Furthermore we show that the precise form of the depth profile is affected by the degree of flatness of the surface of the sample. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that the degree of flatness of the material surface is, in fact, more important than obtaining a precise refractive index match between the immersion oil and the material when seeking a high-quality depth profile or Raman spectrum from within a transparent or semicrystalline material, contrary to accepted norms that samples for interrogation by Raman spectroscopy require little preparation.









Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilson T (1994) Confocal microscopy. Academic, London
Tabaksblat R, Meier RJ, Kip BJ (1992) Confocal Raman microspectroscopy: theory and application to thin polymer samples. Appl Spectrosc 46(1):60–68
Hajatdoost S, Olsthoorn M, Yarwood J (1997) Depth profiling study of effect of annealing temperature on polymer/polymer interfaces in laminates using confocal Raman microspectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 51(12):1784–1790
Mura C, Yarwood J, Swart R, Hodge D (2000) Raman microscopic studies of the distribution of the fungicide fluorfolpet in plasticised PVC films. Polymer 41:8659–8671
Eaton P, Holmes P, Yarwood J (2000) A IR/FT-IR and Raman microscopic investigation of diffusion of silane coupling agents in PVC films. Appl Spectrosc 54(4):508–516
Sammon C, Mura C, Eaton P, Yarwood J (2000) Raman microscopic studies of polymer surfaces and interfaces. Analusis 28(1):30–34
Everall NJ (2000) Modelling and measuring the effect of refraction on the depth resolution of confocal Raman microscopy. Appl Spectrosc 54(6):773–782
Everall NJ (2000) Confocal Raman microscopy: why the depth resolution and spatial accuracy can be much worse than you think. Appl Spectrosc 54(10):1515–1520
Vyorykka J, Halttunen M, Iitti H, Tenhunen J, Vuorinen T, Stenius P (2002) Characteristics of immersion sampling techniques in confocal Raman depth profiling. Appl Spectrosc 56(6):776–782
Tomba PJ, Paster JM (2008) Avoiding coupling fluid-sample interaction in confocal Raman depth profiling with immersion objectives. Appl Spectrosc 62(7):817–819
Michielsen S (2001) Aberrations in confocal spectroscopy of polymeric materials: erroneous thickness and intensities and loss of resolution. J Appl Polym Sci 81:1662–1669
Baia L, Gigant K, Posset U, Schottner G, Keifer W, Popp J (2002) Confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy: theory and application to a hybrid polymer coating. Appl Spectrosc 56(4):536–450
Baia L, Gigant K, Posset U, Schottner G, Keifer W, Popp J (2002) Confocal Raman investigations on hybrid polymer coatings. Vib Spectrosc 29:245–249
Baldwin KJ, Batchelder DN (2001) Confocal Raman microspectroscopy through a planar interface. Appl Spectrosc 55(5):517–524
Bruneel JL, Lassegues JC, Sourisseau C (2002) In-depth analysis by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: experimental features and modelling of the refraction effects. J Raman Spectrosc 33:815–828
Macdonald AM, Vaughan AS, Wyeth P (2005) On confocal Raman spectroscopy of semicrystalline polymers: the effect of optical scattering. Appl Spectrosc 37(12):1475–1481
Macdonald AM, Vaughan AS, Wyeth P (2005) Application of confocal Raman spectroscopy to thin polymer layers on highly scattering substrates: a case study of synthetic adhesives on historic textiles. J Raman Spectrosc 36(3):185–191
Pelletier MJ (2009) Control of out-of focus light intensity in confocal Raman microspectroscopy using optical preprocessing. Appl Spectrosc 65(6):591–596
Macdonald AM, Vaughan AS (2007) Numerical simulations of confocal Raman spectroscopic depth profiles of polymers: a photon scattering approach. J Raman Spectrosc 38(5):584–592
Kroschwitz J (1990) Concise encyclopedia of polymer science and engineering. Wiley, London
Wang JB, Dou Q (2009) Polypropylene/linear low-density polyethylene blends: morphology, crystal structure, optical, and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 111(1):194–202
Dash WC, Newman R (1995) Phys Rev 99:1151–1155
Bower DI, Maddams WF (1980) The vibrational spectroscopy of polymers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Everall N (2004) Depth profiling with confocal Raman microscopy, part II. Spectroscopy 19(11):16–27
Bridges TE, Houline MP, Harris JM (2004) Spatially resolved analysis of small particles by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: depth profiling and optical trapping. Anal Chem 76(3):576–584
Everall N (2008) The influence of out-of-focus sample regions on the surface specificity of confocal Raman microscopy. Appl Spectros 62(6):591–598
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Cargille Oils for provision of oils and to Celia Yeung for her contribution to the exploratory work on this topic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freebody, N.A., Vaughan, A.S. & Macdonald, A.M. On optical depth profiling using confocal Raman spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 396, 2813–2823 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3272-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3272-0


