Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Droplet-based magnetically activated cell separation: analysis of separation efficiency based on the variation of flow-induced circulation in a pendent drop

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under the assumption that separation efficiencies are mainly affected by the velocity of flow-induced circulation due to buffer injection in a pendent drop, this paper describes an analysis of the separation efficiency of a droplet-based magnetically activated cell separation (DMACS) system. To investigate the velocity of the flow-induced circulation, we supposed that numerous flows in a pendent drop could be considered as a “theoretically normalized” flow (or conceptually normalized flow, CNF) based on the Cauchy–Goursat theorem. With the morphological characteristics (length and duration time) of a pendent drop depending on the initial volume, we obtained the velocities of the CNF. By measuring the separation efficiencies for different initial volumes and by analyzing the separation efficiency in terms of the velocity of the CNF, we found that the separation efficiencies (in the case of a low rate of buffer injection; 5 and 15 μl·min-1) are mainly affected by the velocity of the CNF. Moreover, we confirmed that the phenomenological features of a pendent drop cause a fluctuation of its separation efficiencies over a range of specific volumes (initial volumes ranging from 40 to 80 µl), because of the “sweeping-off” phenomenon, that is, positive cells gathered into the positive fraction are forced to move away from the magnetic side by flow-induced circulation due to buffer injection. In addition, from the variation of the duration time, that is, the interval between the beginning of injection of the buffer solution and the time at which a pendent drop detaches, it could also be confirmed that a shorter duration time leads to decrease of the number of positive cells in negative fraction regardless of the rate of buffer injection (5, 15, and 50 μl·min-1). Therefore, if a DMACS system is operated with a 15 μl·min-1 buffer injection flow rate and an initial volume of 80 μl or more, we would have the best efficiency of separation in the negative fraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreas R, Diether R (1995) Curr Opin Immunol 7:270–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim YH, Hong S, Lee KS, Yun S, Kang YR, Paek KK, Ju BK, Lee SH, Kim BK (2007) Rev Sci Instrum 78:074301–074307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Toner M, Irimia D (2005) Annu Rev Biomed Eng 7:77–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger M, Castelino J, Huang R, Shah M, Austin RH (2001) Electrophoresis 22:3883–3892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gijs MAM (2004) Microfluid Nanofluid 1:22–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng T, Whitesides GM, Radhakrishnan M, Zabow G, Prentiss M (2001) Appl Phys Lett 78:1775–1777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng T, Prentiss M, Whitesides GM (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:461–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rong R, Choi JW, Ahn CH (2003) In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE MEMSworkshop (MEMS 2003), Kyoto, Japan. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 530–533

  9. Lee H, Purdon AM, Westervelt RM (2004) Appl Phys Lett 85:1063–1065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramadan Q, Samper V, Poenar D, Yu C (2006) J Microelectromech Syst 15:624–638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramadan Q, Yu C, Samper V, Poenar DP (2006) Appl Phys Lett 88:32501–32503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YH, Hong S, Kim B, Yun S, Kang YR, Paek KK, Lee JW, Lee SH, Ju BK (2004) In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference of the IEEE (EMBS 2004), San Francisco, CA. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 2575–2578

  13. Kim YH, Hong S, Paek KK, Lee SH, Kim B (2006) In: Proceedings of IEEE sensors 2006, Daegu, Korea. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 162–165

  14. Schwinger W, Urban C, Lackner H, Kerbl R, Benesch M, Dornbusch HJ, Sovinz P, Schauenstein K, Schumm M, Handgretinger R (2000) Bone Marrow Transplant 25:513–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurian P, Kasibhatla B, Daum J, Burns CA, Moosa M, Rosenthal KS, Kennedy JP (2003) Biomaterials 24:3493–3503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dennis BZ, Michael RC (1992) Advanced engineering mathematics. PWS, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byungkyu Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Lee, S.H. & Kim, B. Droplet-based magnetically activated cell separation: analysis of separation efficiency based on the variation of flow-induced circulation in a pendent drop. Anal Bioanal Chem 395, 2415–2421 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3131-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3131-z

Keywords