Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of microheterogeneity in solid samples using µXRF

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Micro X-ray fluorescence (µXRF) has been used nondestructively to investigate elemental heterogeneity by constructing two-dimensional maps of elemental concentrations in reference materials. µXRF probes sample sizes well below the 100 mg mass usually recommended for reference materials by NIST. Multivariate methods of analysis, such as principal-component analysis (PCA), show promise in identifying whether “nugget” effects exist within a material, where an element is enriched in small, isolated areas of the sample. The PCA model is built based on data taken in one location and compared with each elemental map. This methodology is shown for several reference materials including SRM 2702 and SRM 2703 to show how PCA treatment can be used to identify which elements exhibit nugget effects within the sub-mg mass range. A method of calculating the minimum recommended mass for solid samples is suggested using PCA iteratively on X-ray maps from which adjacent data points have been averaged. This is repeated until the mass sampled in a map is indistinguishable from data taken at a single location, suggesting no nugget effects can be detected. For SRM 1577c, a mass as low as 370 µg can be used without measurable nugget effects.

Microbeam x-ray fluorescence map showing heterogeneity present for Ti in SRM 2702 (Inorganics in Marine Sediment)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Zeisler R (1998) Fresenius J Anal Chem 360:376–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kempenaers L, Janssens K, Vincze L, Vekemans B, Somogyi A, Drakopoulos M, Simionovici A, Adams F (2002) Anal Chem 74:5017–5026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kempenaers L, De Koster C, Van Borm W, Janssens K (2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 369:733–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pauwels J, Vandecasteele C (1993) Fresenius J Anal Chem 345:121–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gy P (1966) Sampling of materials in bulk- theory and practice. Saint Étienne Societé de l’Industrie Minérale

  6. Wilson AD (1964) Analyst 89:18–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ingamells CO, Switzer P (1973) Talanta 20:547–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurfürst U, Grobecker K, Stoeppler M (1984) Trace Elem 3:591–689

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeisler R (2000) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 245:81–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurfurst U, Pauwels J, Grobecker KH, Stoeppler M, Muntau H (1993) Fresenius J Anal Chem 345:112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohl C, Grobecker KH, Stoeppler M (1987) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 328:413–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stupar J, Dolinsek F, Koren U (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 374:968–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sieber JR, Yu LL, Marlow AF, Butler TA (2005) X-Ray Spectrom 34:153–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sieber JR (2000) X-Ray Spectrom 29:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malinowski E (1991) Factor analysis in chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vekemans B, Janssens K, Vincze L, Aerts A, Adams F, Hertogen J (1997) X-Ray Spectrom 26:333–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods. 2007 [cited; Available from: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/

  18. Hibbert DB (2007) Quality assurance for the analytical chemistry laboratory. Oxford University Press

  19. Henke BL, Gullikson EM, Davis JC (1993) At Data Nucl Data Tables 54:181–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. ISO (2000) ISO Guide 34, in General requirements for the competence of reference material producers. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  21. Elam WT et al (2002) Radiat Phys Chem 63:121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Rolf Zeisler for his helpful discussions and insights.

Disclaimer

The full description of the procedures used in this paper requires the identification of certain commercial products and their suppliers. The inclusion of such information should in no way be construed as indicating that such products or suppliers are endorsed by NIST or are recommended by NIST or that they are necessarily the best materials, instruments, software, or suppliers for the purposes described.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John L. Molloy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molloy, J.L., Sieber, J.R. Classification of microheterogeneity in solid samples using µXRF. Anal Bioanal Chem 392, 995–1001 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2324-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2324-1

Keywords