Skip to main content
Log in

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and colloidal gold immunoassay for ochratoxin A: investigation of analytical conditions and sample matrix on assay performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A polyclonal antibody against ochratoxin A (OTA) was produced from rabbits immunized with the OTA–BSA conjugate. A competitive direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cdELISA) and a membrane-base colloidal gold immunoassay in flow-through format were developed for the rapid detection of OTA in various food matrices. In the cdELISA, the concentration causing 50% inhibition was 0.07 ng mL−1, and the effects of different chemical conditions (ionic strength, pH value, and organic solvent) were studied. The sensitivity of the assay was higher than those previously reported. A simple, rapid, and efficient extraction method was developed and 74–110% recoveries of spiked samples were obtained. Fifty percent methanol extracts of some food samples such as barley, wheat, oat, corn, rice, and raisins could be analyzed directly by immunoassay after dilution in PBS; grape juice and beer samples could be analyzed directly after dilution with PBS; for coffee samples, a more complex method was used to remove the matrix effect effectively. Membrane-based colloidal gold immunoassays had a visual detection limit of 1.0 ng mL−1 for OTA with a detection time of less than 10 min. For the validation of the cdELISA and membrane-based colloidal gold immunoassay, samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The correlation between data obtained using the microwell assay and HPLC was good (R 2 = 0.984). The developed immunoassay methods are suitable for the rapid quantitative or qualitative determination of OTA in food samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hong Kong risk assessment studies report (2006) No 23:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abouzied MM, Horvath AD, Podlesny PM, Regina NP, Metodiev VD, Kamenova-Tozeva RM, Niagolova ND, Stein AD, Petropoulos EA, Ganev VS (2002) Food Addit Contam 19(8):755–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JECFA (2002) No. 906:28

  4. EU Regulation (2005) No 123/2005, L25:3–5

  5. Palmisano LMF (2004) Anal Bioanal Chem 378:96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jornet D, Busto O, Guasch J (2000) J Chromatogr A 822:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aboul-Enein HY, Kutluk OB, Altiokka G, Tuncel M (2002) Biomed Chromatogr 16:470–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Curtui VG, Gareis M (2001) Food Addit Contam 18(7):635–643

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia-Villanova RJ, Cordon C, Paramas AMG, Aparicio P, Rosales MEG (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:7235–7239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Czerwiecki L, Wilczynska G, Kwiecien A (2005) Food Addit Contam 22(2):158–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pestka JJ, Steinert BW, Chu FS (1981) Appl Environ Microb 41(6):1472–1474

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rousseau DM, Candlish AAG, Slegers GA, Peteghem CHV, Stimson WH, Smith JE (1987) Appl Environ Microb 53(3):514–518

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke JR, Marquardt RR, Oosterveld A, Frohlich AA, Madrid FJ, Dawood M (1993) J Agric Food Chem 41:1784–1789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barna-Vetro I, Solti L, Teren J, Gyongyosi A, Szabo E, Wolfling A (1996) J Agric Food Chem 44:4070–4074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thirumala-Devi K, Mayo MA, Reddy G, Reddy SV, Delfosse P, Reddy DVR (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:5079–5082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujii S, Ribeiro RMR, Scholz MBDS, Ono EYS, Prete CEC, Itano EN, Ueno Y, Kawamura O, Hirooka EY (2006) Food Addit Contam 23(9):902–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thirumala-Devi K, Mayo MA, Reddy G, Emmanuel KE, Larondelle Y, Reddy DVR (2001) Food Addit Contam 18(9):830–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu FY, Chi TF, Liu BH, Su CC (2005) J Agri Food Chem 53:6947–6953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan MRA, McNerney R, Chan HWS (1983) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 66:1481–1484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee SC, Chu FS (1984) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 67:45–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cho YJ, Lee DH, Kim DO, Min WK, Bong KT, Lee GG, Seo JH (2005) J Agri Food Chem 53:8447–8451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang S, Allan RD, Skerritt JH, Kennedy IR (1998) J Agric Food Chem 46:3330–3338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang S, Zhang C, Wang JP, Zhang Y (2005) Anal Chim Acta 546:161–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Krotzky AJ, Zeeh B (1995) Pesticides report 33. Pure Appl Chem 67:2065–2088

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for financial supports from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (project No.2006BAD05A06, 2006AA10Z448), the New Century Talent Program of Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China (project No. NECT-04-0243).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuo Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, XH., Liu, T., Xu, N. et al. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and colloidal gold immunoassay for ochratoxin A: investigation of analytical conditions and sample matrix on assay performance. Anal Bioanal Chem 389, 903–911 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1506-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1506-6

Keywords

Navigation