Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sensitive and selective determination of glutathione in probiotic bacteria by capillary electrophoresis–laser induced fluorescence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glutathione (GSH) is a thiol with an important function in protecting tissue against the oxidative stress which has been related to carcinogenesis in the colon. For this reason the development of probiotic species producing glutathione could be of great interest. To determine the glutathione content of some probiotic bacteria of the Bifidobacterium and Lactococcus genera, a very sensitive and selective analytical method based on capillary electrophoresis coupled to laser-induced fluorescence detection has been developed. Pretreatment of cell-lysate samples is very simple—precipitation of protein with acetonitrile in 1:2 volume ratio. The fluorophore 5-iodoacetamidofluorescein (5-IAF) was chosen for glutathione derivatisation; it reacts with thiols at pH 12.5, forming a fluorescent adduct which is excited by a laser at 488 nm for detection. The reaction conditions optimised were temperature, time, and 5-IAF/GSH molar ratio. Electrophoresis was performed with a carbonate buffer (25 mmol L−1, pH 9.8) as background electrolyte and a voltage of 30 kV; an electrophoretic run was complete in less than 7 min. There was a good linear relationship between concentration and response in the range 2.5–500 ng mL−1 and the LOD was 0.5 ng mL−1. The glutathione content of probiotic cells was determined by using the standard additions method to reduce matrix effects. The method was fully validated and shown to be of suitable sensitivity and selectivity for determination of GSH in probiotic cell lysates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Larsson A, Orrenius S, Holmgren A, Manervik B (1983) Function of glutathione. Biochemical, physiological, toxicological and clinical aspects. Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shan X, Aw TY, Jones DP (1990) Pharmacol Ther 47:61–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson ME (1997) In: Punchard NA, Kelly FJ (eds) Free radicals. A practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simic MG (1988) Mutat Res 202:377–386

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bounous G (2000) Anticancer Res 20:4785–4792

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Babbs CF (1990) Free Radical Bio Med 8:191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kane DJ, Sarafian TA, Anton R, Hahn H, Butler Gralla E, Selverstone VJ, Ord T, Bredsen TE (1993) Science 262:1274–1277

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guarner F, Schaafsma GJ (1998) Int J Food Microbiol 39:237–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaizu H, Sasaki M, Nakajima H, Suzuki YJ (1993) Dairy Sci 76:2493–2499

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanders JW, Leenhouts KJ, Haandrikman AJ, Venema G, Kok J (1995) J Bacteriol 177:5254–5260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Spadaro A, Bousquet E, Santagati NA, Vittorio F, Ronsisvalle G (2005) Chromatographia 62:11–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Remiao F, Carmo H, Carvalho F, Bastos ML (2000) Biomed Chromatogr 14:468–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Camera E, Rinaldi M, Briganti S, Picardo M, Fanali S (2001) J Chromatogr B 757:69–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Diez L, Martenka E, Dabrowska A, Coulon J, Leroy P (2005) J Chromatogr B 827:44–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Komatsu H, Obata F (2003) Biomed Chromatogr 17:345–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cereser C, Guichard J, Drai J, Bannier E, Garcia I, Boget S, Parvaz P, Revol A (2001) J Chromatogr B 752:123–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sack R, Willi A, Hunziker PE (2000) J Liq Chromatogr R T 23:2947–2962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raggi MA, Mandrioli R, Bugamelli F, Sabbioni C (1997) Chromatographia 46:17–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Raggi MA, Mandrioli R, Casamenti G, Musiani D, Marini M (1998) Biomed Chromatogr 12:262–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Raggi MA, Mandrioli R, Sabbioni C, Mongiello F, Marini M, Fanali S (1998) J Microcolumn Sep 10:503–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carlucci F, Tabucchi A, Biagioli B, Sani G, Lisi G, Maccherini M, Rosi F, Marinello E (2000) Electrophoresis 21:1552–1557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jin W, Li X, Gao N (2003) Anal Chem 75:3859–3864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang W, Xin H, Shao H, Jin W (2003) J Chromatogr B 789:425–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Govindaraju K, Govindaraju V, Eidelman DH (2003) J Chromatogr B 788:369–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hogan BL, Yeung ES (1992) Anal Chem 64:2841–2845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang J, Hu Z, Chen X (2005) Talanta 65:986–990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lochman P, Adam T, Friedecký D, Hlídková E, Škopková Z (2003) Electrophoresis 24:1200–1207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chassaing C, Gonin J, Wilcox CS, Wainer IW (1999) J Chromatogr B 735:219–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zinellu A, Sotgia S, Usai MF, Chessa R, Deiana L, Carru C (2005) Electrophoresis 26:1963–1968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Causse E, Issac C, Malatray P, Bayle C, Valdiguie P, Salvayre R, Couderc F (2000) J Chromatogr A 895:173–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bayle C, Issac C, Salvayre R, Couderc F, Causse E (2002) J Chromatogr A 979:255–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Causse E, Malatray P, Calaf R, Charpiot P, Candito M, Bayle C, Valdiguie P, Salvayre R, Couderc F (2000) Electrophoresis 21:2074–2079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zinellu A, Carru C, Galistu F, Usai MF, Pes GM, Baggio G, Federici G, Deiana L (2003) Electrophoresis 24:2796–2804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zinellu A, Carru C, Sotgia S, Deiana L (2004) J Chromatogr B 803:299–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Carru C, Deiana L, Sotgia S, Pes GM, Zinellu A (2004) Electrophoresis 25:882–889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. United States Pharmacopeia 28th Edition (2005). United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, pp 2748–2751

  37. Shah VP, Midha KK, Findlay JWA, Hill HM, Hulse JD, McGilveray IJ, Mckay G, Miller KJ, Patnaik RN, Powell ML, Tonelli A, Viswanathan CT, Yacobi A (2000) Pharm Res 17:1551–1557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zinellu A, Sotgia S, Posadino AM, Pasciu V, Perino MG, Tadolini B, Deiana L, Carru C (2005) Electrophoresis 26:1063–1070

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Stempak D, Dallas S, Klein J, Bendayan R, Koren G, Baruchel S (2001) Ther Drug Monit 23:542–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Panak KC, Ruiz OA, Giorgieri SA, Diaz LE (1996) Electrophoresis 17:1613–1616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fernandes L, Steele JL (1993) J Dairy Sci 76:1233–1242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Italy - ex-60% funds). Thanks are due to Dr Francesca Bugamelli for performing preliminary HPLC assays.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Augusta Raggi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Musenga, A., Mandrioli, R., Bonifazi, P. et al. Sensitive and selective determination of glutathione in probiotic bacteria by capillary electrophoresis–laser induced fluorescence. Anal Bioanal Chem 387, 917–924 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0980-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0980-6

Keywords