Skip to main content
Log in

Robust and non-parametric statistics in the evaluation of figures of merit of analytical methods. Practices for students

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A set of laboratory practices is proposed in which evaluation of the quality of the analytical measurements is incorporated explicitly by applying systematically suitable methodology for extracting the useful information contained in chemical data. Non-parametric and robust techniques useful for detecting outliers have been used to evaluate different figures of merit in the validation and optimization of analytical methods. In particular, they are used for determination of the capability of detection according to ISO 11843 and IUPAC and for determination of linear range, for assessment of the response surface fitted using an experimental design to optimize an instrumental technique, and for analysis of a proficiency test carried out by different groups of students. The tools used are robust regression, least median of squares (LMS) regression, and some robust estimators as median absolute deviation (m.a.d.) or Huber estimator, which are very useful as an alternatives to the usual centralization and dispersion estimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. González J, Wagenaar R (eds) (2003) Tuning educational structures in Europe. Final report. Pilot project, Phase one. University of Deusto, Bilbao

  2. Moore J (1989) J Chem Educ 66:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  3. Statgraphics Plus for Windows 4.0. Statistical Graphics Corporation

  4. Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (1987) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sarabia LA, Ortiz MC (1994) Trends Anal Chem 13:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mathieu D, Nony J, Phan-Tan-Luu R (2000) NEMRODW Version 2000. LPRAI, Marseille

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson M, Wood R (1993) J AOAC Int 76:926–940

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Standard Organization ISO 5725-5 (1998) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurements methods and results. Alternative methods for the determination of the precision of a standard measurement method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  9. Analytical Methods Committee. Robust Statistic Part I & II (1989) Analyst 114:1693–1702

    Google Scholar 

  10. Draper N, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hampel FR, Ronchetti EM, Rousseeuw PJ, Stahel WA (1986) Robust statistics. The approach based on influence functions. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Standard Organization ISO 11843-1 (1997) Capability of detection: terms and definitions. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Standard Organization ISO 11843-2 (2000) Capability of detection: methodology in the linear calibration case. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  14. Inczédy J, Lengyel T, Ure AM, Gelencsér A, Hulanicki A (1998) IUPAC, Compendium of analytical nomenclature, 3rd ed. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis GA, Mathieu D, Phan-Tan-Luu R (1999) Pharmaceutical experimental design. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Junta de Castilla y León (project UB20/02 and UB14/04) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Herrero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cruz Ortiz, M., Herrero, A., Sanllorente, S. et al. Robust and non-parametric statistics in the evaluation of figures of merit of analytical methods. Practices for students. Anal Bioanal Chem 382, 320–327 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-3092-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-3092-9

Keywords

Navigation