Skip to main content
Log in

Mercury and trace element fractionation in Almaden soils by application of different sequential extraction procedures

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of the mercury distribution in a soil sample from Almaden (Spain) has been performed by applying three different sequential extraction procedures, namely, modified BCR (three steps in sequence), Di Giulio–Ryan (four steps in sequence), and a specific SEP developed at CIEMAT (six steps in sequence). There were important differences in the mercury extraction results obtained by the three procedures according to the reagents applied and the sequence of their application. These findings highlight the difficulty of setting a universal SEP to obtain information on metal fractions of different mobility for any soil sample, as well as the requirement for knowledge about the mineralogical and chemical characteristics of the samples. The specific six-step CIEMAT sequential extraction procedure was applied to a soil profile (Ap, Ah, Bt1, and Bt2 horizons). The distribution of mercury and major, minor, and trace elements in the different fractions were determined. The results indicate that mercury is mainly released with 6 M HCl. The strong association of mercury with crystalline iron oxyhydroxides, present in all the horizons of the profile, and/or the solubility of some mercury compounds in such acid can explain this fact. Minor mercury is found in the fraction assigned to oxidizable matter and in the final insoluble residue (cinnabar).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hernandez A, Jebrak M, Higueras P, Oyarzun R, Morata D, Munha J (1999) Miner Depos 34:39–548

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mitra S (1986) Mercury in the ecosystem: its dispersion and pollution today. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrara R, Maserati BE, Anderson M, Hender H, Ragnarson P, Svanberg S, Hernández A (1998) Atmos Environ 32:3897–3904

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carrasco J, Manzanares P, Tallos A, Recreo F, Vera R, Sánchez DM, Quejido A, Murillo JM, Escalada R, Fernández M, Martinez JM (2001) Final report bioremediation and economical renewal of industrially degraded land using biomass fuel crops. Biorenew. European Commission. ENV4-CT97-0610

  5. Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Appendix E contaminant persistence and mobility factors http://www.epa.gov/safewater/uic/classv/pdfs/appe.pdf

  6. McLean JE, Bledsoe BE (1992) Behaviour of metals in soils, ground water issue. US EPA. EPA/540/S-92/018

  7. Ure A, Quevauviller Ph, Muntau H, Griepink B (1993) Intern J Environ Anal Chem 51:135

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quevauviller Ph (1998) Trends Anal Chem 17(10):632–642

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sahuquillo A, López-Sánchez JF, Rubio R, Rauret G, Thomas RP, Davidson CM, Ure AM (1999) Anal Chim Acta 382:317–327

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sahuquillo A, Rauret G, Bianchi M, Rehnert A, Muntau H (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem 375:578–583

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pérez del Villar L, Quejido AJ, Crespo M, Sánchez M, Cózar JS, Galán P, Fernández-Díaz M (2002) Trends Geochem 2:19–41

    Google Scholar 

  12. Di Giulio RT, Ryan E (1987) Water Air Soil Pollut 33:205–219

    Google Scholar 

  13. Millán R, Gamarra R, Vera R, Schmid T (2003) Mercury uptake for plant species from an Almaden test plot. In: Proceedings of the 7th ICOBTE congress. Uppsala, Sweden

  14. Schmid T, Millán R, Vera R, Tallos A, Recreo F, Quejido A, Sánchez DM, Fernández M (2003) The distribution of mercury in a characterized soil affected by mining activities. In: ConSoil 8th international FZK/TNO conference, Ghent, Belgium

  15. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) Soil Sci 37:29–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Walkley A (1947) Soil Sci 63:251–264

    Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM D422-63 (1985) American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

  18. Rodriguez Martín-Doimeadios RC, Wasserman JC, García Bermejo LF,Mouroux D, Berzas Nevado JJ, Donard OFX (2000) J Environ Monit 2:360–366

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hylander LD, Meili M, Oliveira LJ, de Castro e Silva E, Guimaraes JRD, Araujo DM, Neves RP, Stachiw R, Barros AJP, Silva GD (2000) Sci Total Environ 260 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rytuba JJ (2000) Science Total Environ 260:57–71

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mikak N, Foucher D, Niessen S, Fischer JC (2002) Anal Bional Chem 274:1028–1033

    Google Scholar 

  22. Higueras P, Oyarzun R, Biester H, Lillo J, Lorenzo S (2003) J Geochem Explor 80:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  23. Berzas Nevado JJ, García Bermejo LF, Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadios RC (2003) Environ Pollut 122:261–271

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been done with the financial support of the Spanish Government, Ministry of Science and Technology (Reference No. REN2002-04229-C02-02/TECNO). We thank the anonymous ABC reviewers for constructive comments that helped us to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Sánchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sánchez, D.M., Quejido, A.J., Fernández, M. et al. Mercury and trace element fractionation in Almaden soils by application of different sequential extraction procedures. Anal Bioanal Chem 381, 1507–1513 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-3058-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-3058-y

Keywords

Navigation