Skip to main content
Log in

Identification and quantification of gossypol in cotton by using packed micro-tips columns in combination with HPLC

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-packed micro-tip columns containing a C18-bonded silica stationary phase, based on the same principles as solid-phase extraction methods, were used to obtain gossypol and related sesquiterpenoid aldehyde-enriched fractions. The enriched metabolite fractions were then analyzed by optimized high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a C18 column (4.6 mm×25 cm) eluted with the binary mobile phase acetonitrile–0.1% aqueous TFA solution (80:20). This method has proven to be highly reproducible. The precision and accuracy, as %RSD and %RME values, were determined to be less than 15% for the method. The minimum detection limit of gossypol was determined to be 10 ng (absolute gossypol). Absolute recovery was greater than 94% with a standard deviation of ±3.68%. This is a simple, fast, and cost-effective method for isolation, identification, and quantification of gossypol and related secondary metabolites. Comparative analysis of gossypol content was performed on different parts of the cotton plant (seeds, stems and leaves) of two different cultivars of Gossypium hirsutum L. (Acala1517–70 and OR19). The results indicate that the OR19 cv naturally contains higher gossypol levels than the Acala cv. It was also found that treatment of leaves with a Verticillium dahliae-derived elicitor induced production of deoxyhemigossypol rather than gossypol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

ODS:

Octadecylsilane

TA:

Terpenoid aldehyde

TLC:

Thin-layer chromatography

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

GC:

Gas chromatography

HG:

Hemigossypol

DHG:

6-Deoxyhemigossypol

G:

Gossypol

H:

Heliocides (H1–H4)

Cv:

Cultivar

V e :

Elution volume

RSD:

Relative standard deviation of the mean

RME:

Relative mean error

References

  1. Bell AA, Stipanovic RD, Howell CR, Fryxell PA (1975) Phytochemistry 14:225–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stipanovic RD, Altman DW, Begin DL, Greenblatt GA, Benedict JH (1988) J Agric Food Chem 36:509–515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abraham KJ, Pierce ML, Essenberg M (1999) Phytochemistry 52:829–836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu J, Benedict CR, Stipanovic RD, Bell AA (1999) Plant Physiol 121:1017–1024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Essenberg M, Grover PB, Cover EC (1990) Phytochemistry 29:3107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KJ, Dabrowski K (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:3056–3061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindberg C, Naqvi RH, Matlin SA, Zhou RH, Bailey G, Blye RP (1987) Int J Androl 10:619–623

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Band V, Hoffer AP, Band H, Rhinehardt AE, Knapp RC, Malin SA, Anderson DJ (1989) Gynecol Oncol 32:273–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Puckhaber LS, Dowd MK, Stipanovic RD, Howell CR (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:7017–7021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Benson CG, Wyllie SG, Leach DN, Mares CL, Fitt GP (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:2181–2184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahoney NE, Chan BG (1985) J Chromatogr 329:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rappsilber J, Ishihama Y, Mann M (2003) Anal Chem 75:663–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubery IA, Slater V (1997) Phytochemistry 44:1429–1434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cai Y, Zhang H, Zeng Y, Mo J, Bao J, Miao C, Yan F, Bai J, Chen F (2004) J Biosci 29:67–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang GY, Ma SY, Liu ZG (1999) J Agric Univ Hebei 22:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xia ZJ, Gu BK, Wu AM (1994) Acta Phytophylact Sin 21:305–310

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bell AA, Stipanovic RD, O’Brian DH, Fryxell PA (1978) Phytochemistry 17:1297–1305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bell AA, Stipanovic RD, O’Brian DH, Lukefahr MJ (1978) J Agric Food Chem 26:115–118

    Google Scholar 

  19. Causon R (1997) J Chromatogr B 689:175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang YH, Davila-Huerta G, Essenberg M (2003) Phytochemistry 63:219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bell AA, Stipanovic RD, Mace ME (1993) Beltwide cotton conferences. National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, pp 197–201

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. A. Dubery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, R., Vorster, S. & Dubery, I.A. Identification and quantification of gossypol in cotton by using packed micro-tips columns in combination with HPLC. Anal Bioanal Chem 380, 719–724 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2817-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2817-5

Keywords

Navigation