Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Time series analysis of long-term data sets of atmospheric mercury concentrations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different aspects and techniques of time series analysis were used to investigate long-term data sets of atmospheric mercury in the Northern Hemisphere. Two perennial time series from different latitudes with different seasonal behaviour were chosen: first, Mace Head on the west coast of Ireland (53°20′N, 9°54′W), representing Northern Hemispherical background conditions in Europe with no indications for so-called atmospheric mercury depletion events (AMDEs); and second, Alert, Canada (82°28′N, 62°30′W), showing strong AMDEs during Arctic springtime. Possible trends were extracted and forecasts were performed by using seasonal decomposition procedures, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) methods and exponential smoothing (ES) techniques. The application of time series analysis to environmental data is shown in respect of atmospheric long-term data sets, and selected advantages are discussed. Both time series have not shown any statistically significant temporal trend in the gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) concentrations since 1995, representing low Northern Hemispherical background concentrations of 1.72±0.09 ng m−3 (Mace Head) and 1.55±0.18 ng m−3 (Alert), respectively. The annual forecasts for the GEM concentrations in 2001 at Alert by two different techniques were in good agreement with the measured concentrations for this year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Schwartz J, Marcus A (1990) Am J Epidemiol 131:185–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Salcedo RLR, Alvim Ferraz MCM, Alves CA, Martins FG (1999) Atmos Environ 33:2361–2372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cimino G, Del Duce G, Kadonaga LK, Rotundo G, Sisani A, Stabile G, Tirozzi B, Whiticar M (1999) Chem Geol 161(1–3):253–270

  4. Boken VK (2000) Agronomy J 92(6):1047–1053

    Google Scholar 

  5. Navarro-Esbri J, Diamadopoulos E, Ginestar D (2002) Resour Conserv Recycling 35(3):201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen JK, Shearer AR (eds) (1997) Canadian arctic contaminants assessment report. Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa

  7. Ebinghaus R, Kock HH, Temme C, Einax JW, Loewe AG, Richter A, Burrows JP, Schroeder WH (2002) Environ Sci Technol 36(6):1238–1244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Horvat M (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 274:981–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Temme C, Slemr F, Ebinghaus R, Einax JW (2001) Atmos Environ 37:1889–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzgerald WF (1995) Water Air Soil Pollut 80:245–254

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebinghaus R, Tripathi RM, Wallschläger D, Lindberg SE (1999) Natural and anthropogenic mercury sources and their impact on the air-surface exchange of mercury on regional and global scales. In: Ebinghaus R, Turner RR, de Lacerda LD, Vasiliev O (eds) Mercury contaminated sites. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–50

  12. Schroeder WH, Anlauf KG, Barrie LA, Lu JY, Steffen A, Schneeberger DR, Berg T (1998) Nature 394:331–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slemr F, Scheel HE (1998) Atmos Environ 32:845–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker PGL, Brunke E-G, Slemr F, Crouch AM (2002) Atmos Environ 36:2459–2465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebinghaus R, Kock HH, Coggins AM, Spain TG, Jennings SG, Temme C (2002) Atmos Environ 36:5267–5276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schroeder WH, Ebinghaus R, Shoeib M, Timoschenko K, Barrie LA (1995) Water Air Soil Pollut 80:1227–1236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Berg T, Bartnicki J, Munthe J, Lattila H, Hrehoruk J, Mazur A (2001) Atmos Environ 14:2569–2582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindberg SE, Brooks S, Lin CJ, Scott KJ, Landis MS, Stevens RK (2002) Environ Sci Technol 36(6):1245–1256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu JY, Schroeder WH, Barrie LA, Steffen A, Welch HE, Martin K, Lockhart WL, Hunt RV, Boila G, Richter A (2001) Geophys Res Lett 28:3219–3222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boudris H, Bottenheim JW (2000) Geophys Res Lett 27(1):517–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hopper JF, Hart W (1994) J Geophys Res 99:25315–25328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jennings SG, McGovern F, Cooke WF (1993) Atmos Environ 27A:1229–1239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ebinghaus R, Kock HH, Jennings SG, McCartin P, Orren MJ (1995) Atmos Environ 29 (22):3333–3344

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ebinghaus R, Jennings SG, Schroeder WH, Berg T, Donaghy T, Guentzel J, Kenny C, Kock HH, Kvietkus K, Landing W, Munthe J, Prestbo EM, Schneeberger D, Slemr F, Sommar J, Urba A, Wallschläger D, Xiao Z (1999) Atmos Environ 33:3063–3073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schroeder WH, Keeler G, Kock HH, Roussel P, Schneeberger D, Schaedlich F (1995) Water Air Soil Pollut 80:611–620

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schroeder WH, Lamborg C, Schneeberger D, Fitzgerald WF, Srivastava B (1995) Comparison of a manual method and an automated analyzer for determining total gaseous mercury in ambient air. In: Wilken R-D, Förstner U, Knöchel A (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international conference on heavy metals in the environment. CEP Consultants Ltd., Edinburgh vol 2, pp 57–60

  27. Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1976) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kendall MG (1984) Time series. Oxford University Press, New York

  29. Shumway RH (1998) Applied statistical time series analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  30. Wei WW (1989) Time series analysis: univariate and multivariate methods. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schlittgen R, Streitberg BGJ (2001) Zeitreihenanalyse. Oldenbourg, München

  32. Stier W (2001) Methoden der Zeitreihenanalyse. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  33. Shiskin J, Young AH, Musgrave JC (1967) The X-11 variant of the census method II seasonal adjustment program. Technical paper no.15, Bureau of the Census, Washington

  34. Gardner ES Jr (1985) J Forecasting 4:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  35. McDowall D, McCleary R, Meidinger EE, Hay RA (1980) Interrupted time series analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills

  36. Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods, 4th edn. Griffin, London

  37. Schroeder WH, Schneeberger D (1996) High temporal resolution measurements of total gaseous mercury at Alert, Northwest Territories, Canada. In: Ebinghaus R, Petersen G, Tumpling U (eds) 4th international conference on mercury as a global pollutant, Hamburg

  38. Iverfeldt Å, Munthe J, Pacyna J, Brosset C (1995) Water Air Soil Pollut 80:227–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Axenfeldt F, Münch J, Pacyna J (1991) Europäische Test-Emissionsdatenbasis von Quecksilberkomponenten für Modellrechnungen. In: Petersen G (ed) Belastung von Nord-und Ostsee durch ökologisch gefährliche Stoffe am Beispiel atmosphärischer Quecksilberverbindungen. Abschlussbericht des Forschungsvorhabens 10402726 des Umweltforschungsplanes des Bundesministers für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, Berlin. External Report GKSS 92/E/111, GKSS Research Centre Geesthacht, Geesthacht

  40. Pacyna JM, Pacyna EG (2000) Assessment of emissions/discharges of merucry reaching the Arctic environment. NILU Report OR7/2000, Norsk institutt for luftforskning, Kjeller

  41. Slemr F, Brunke E-G, Ebinghaus R, Temme C, Munthe J, Waengberg I, Schroeder WH, Steffen A, Berg T (2003) Geophys Res Lett 30(10):1516–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GKSS Research Centre Geesthacht, Institute for Coastal Research, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany

    Christian Temme & Ralf Ebinghaus

  2. Institute for Inorganic und Analytical Chemistry, Department of Environmental Analysis, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Lessingstr. 8, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Jürgen W. Einax

  3. Meteorological Service of Canada, Downsview/Toronto, ON, Canada, M3H 5T4

    Alexandra Steffen & William H. Schroeder

Authors
  1. Christian Temme
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ralf Ebinghaus
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jürgen W. Einax
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexandra Steffen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William H. Schroeder
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Temme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Temme, C., Ebinghaus, R., Einax, J.W. et al. Time series analysis of long-term data sets of atmospheric mercury concentrations. Anal Bioanal Chem 380, 493–501 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2715-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2715-x

Keywords