Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of UVC-induced DNA damage in bloodstains: forensic implications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to detect DNA polymorphisms using molecular genetic techniques has revolutionized the forensic analysis of biological evidence. DNA typing now plays a critical role within the criminal justice system, but one of the limiting factors with the technology is that DNA isolated from biological stains recovered from the crime scene is sometimes so damaged as to be intractable to analysis. Potential remedies for damaged DNA are likely to be dependent upon the precise nature of the DNA damage present in any particular sample but, unfortunately, current knowledge of the biochemical nature, and the extent, of such DNA damage in dried biological stains is rudimentary. As a model for DNA damage assessment in biological stains recovered from crime scenes, we have subjected human bloodstains and naked DNA in the hydrated and dehydrated states to varying doses of UVC radiation. It was possible to damage the DNA sufficiently in a bloodstain to cause a standard autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) profile to be lost. However, a detailed analysis of the process, based upon assays developed to detect bipyrimidine photoproducts (BPPPs), single- and double-strand breaks, and DNA–DNA crosslinks, produced some unexpected findings. Contrary to the situation with living tissues or cells in culture, the predominant UVC-induced damage to DNA in bloodstains appears not to be pyrimidine dimers. Although some evidence for the presence of BPPPs and DNA crosslinks was obtained, the major form of UVC damage causing genetic profile loss appeared to be single-strand breaks. It was not possible, however, to preclude the possibility that a combination of damage types was responsible for the profile loss observed. We demonstrate here that a significant measure of protection against UVC-mediated genetic profile loss in dried biological stain material is afforded by the dehydrated state of the DNA and, to a lesser extent, the DNA cellular milieu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a, b
Fig. 2a–c
Fig. 3a, b
Fig. 4a–c
Fig. 5a, b
Fig. 6a–c
Fig. 7a–c

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lindahl T (1993) Nature 362:709–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McNally L, Shaler RC, Baird M, Balazs I, De Forest P, Kobilinsky L (1989) J Forensic Sci 34:1059–1069

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McNally L, Shaler RC, Baird M, Balazs I, Kobilinsky L, De Forest P (1989) J Forensic Sci 34:1070–1077

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoss M, Jaruga P, Zastawny TH, Dizdaroglu M, Paabo S (1996) Nucleic Acids Res 24:1304–1307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. TWGDAM (1995) Crime Lab Dig 22:21–43

    Google Scholar 

  6. Budowle B, Moretti TR, Keys KM, Koons BW, Smerick JB (1997) J Forensic Sci 42:701–707

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cosso S, Reynolds R (1995) J Forensic Sci 40:424–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams DE, Presley LA, Baumstark AL, Hensley KW, Hill AL, Anoe KS, Campbell PA, McLaughlin CM, Budowle B, Giusti AM et al (1991) J Forensic Sci 36:1284–1298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lins AM, Micka KA, Sprecher CJ, Taylor JA, Bacher JW, Rabbach DR, Bever RA, Creacy SD, Schumm JW (1998) J Forensic Sci 43:1168–1180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wallin JM, Buoncristiani MR, Lazaruk KD, Fildes N, Holt CL, Walsh PS (1998) J Forensic Sci 43:854–870

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedberg ECWG, Siede W (1995) DNA repair and mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington

  12. Chandrasekhar D, Van Houten B (2000) Mutat Res 450:19–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Todo T (1999) Mutat Res 434:89–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Comey CTKB, Presley KW, Smerick JB, Sobieralski CA, Stanley DM, Baechtel FS (1994) J Forensic Sci 39:1254–1269

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenstein BS, Rosenstein RB (1992) J Photochem Photobiol B 16:247–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuluncsics Z, Perdiz D, Brulay E, Muel B, Sage E (1999) J Photochem Photobiol B 49:71–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon JH, Lee CS, O’Connor TR, Yasui A, Pfeifer GP (2000) J Mol Biol 299:681–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garvish JF, Lloyd RS (1999) J Biol Chem 274:9786–9794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakabeppu Y, Yamashita K, Sekiguchi M (1982) J Biol Chem 257:2556–2562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Avery AM, Kaur B, Taylor JS, Mello JA, Essigmann JM, Doetsch PW (1999) Nucleic Acids Res 27:2256–2264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wehner J, Horneck G (1995) J Photochem Photobiol B 30:171–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Ballantyne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, A., Ballantyne, J. Characterization of UVC-induced DNA damage in bloodstains: forensic implications. Anal Bioanal Chem 380, 72–83 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2681-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2681-3

Keywords

Navigation