Skip to main content
Log in

Forensic discrimination of photocopy and printer toners. III. Multivariate statistics applied to scanning electron microscopy and pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Copy toner samples were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy with X-ray dispersive analysis (SEM–EDX) and pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py–GC/MS). Principal component and cluster analysis of SEM data for 166 copy toner samples established 13 statistically different subgroups, with the presence or absence of a ferrite base being a major division. When toners were compared for which both SEM and reflection–absorption infrared spectral data were available, 41% of the samples could be assigned to specific manufacturers. Py–GC/MS on poly(styrene:acrylate)-based toners produced eight peaks relevant to toner differentiation. One third of the toners clustered in a small group that contained five statistically different subgroups. Of the 57 toners for which both Py–GC/MS and SEM data were available, 31 could be differentiated using the combined analytical results. The synergy of the complementary information provided by Py–GC/MS and SEM narrows matching possibilities for forensic investigations involving copied or laser printed documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cantu AA (1991) Anal Chem 63:847A–854A

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Totty RN (1990) Forensic Sci Int 46:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilmour CL (1994) Can Soc Forensic Sci J 27:245–259

    Google Scholar 

  4. Merrill RA, Bartick EG, Taylor HJ III (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem (in press) Doi 10.1007/s00216-003-2073-0

  5. Egan WJ, Morgan SL, Bartick EG, Merrill RA, Taylor, HJ III (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem (in press) Doi 10.1007/s00216-003-2074-z

  6. Totty RN (1990) Forensic Sci Rev 2:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holland NW (1984) J Forensic Sci Soc 24:23–41

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hilton O (1988) J Forensic Sci 33:130–139

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gerhart FJ (1992) J Forensic Sci 37:1310–1318

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brandi J, James B, Gutowski SJ (1997) Int J Forensic Document Examiners 3:324–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Warman GP, Curry CJ, Burke P (1984) 9th Int Assoc Forensic Sciences Meeting, Oxford

  12. Totty RN, Kemp GS, German B, Metcalfe GS, Hubbleday E (1985) Proc Int Symp Questioned Documents, FBI Academy, Quantico, pp 49–69

  13. Duewer DL, Kowalski BR (1975) Anal Chem 47:526–530

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Simon PJ, Giessen BC, Copeland TR (1977) Anal Chem 49:2285–2288

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Trzcinska BM, Brozek-Mucha Z (1997) Mikrochim Acta Suppl 14:235–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roznowski J, Trzcinska BM, Koscielniak P (1998) Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych 38:79–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brandi J, James B, Gutowski SJ (1997) Int J Forensic Document Examiners 3:324–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Irwin WJ (1982) Analytical pyrolysis: a comprehensive guide. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wampler TP (1997) (ed) Applied pyrolysis handbook. Marcel Dekker, New York

  20. Wheals BW (1985) J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 8:503–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wampler TP, Levy EJ (1985) Crime Lab Digest 12:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  22. Munson TO (1987) Crime Lab Digest 14:112–117

    Google Scholar 

  23. Levy EJ, Wampler TP (1987) Proc Int Symp Questioned Documents; Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington DC, p 141

  24. Challinor JM (1990) Chem Aust 57:90–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wampler TP (1991) Proc Int Symp Forensic Aspects of Trace Evidence, FBI Academy, Quantico, pp 191–203

  26. Challinor JM (1997) In: Wampler TP (ed) Applied pyrolysis handbook. Marcel Dekker, New York

  27. Levy EJ, Wampler TP (1986) J Forensic Sci 31:258–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zimmerman J, Mooney D, Kimmett MJ (1986) J Forensic Sci 31:489–493

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Munson TO (1989) J Forensic Sci 34:352–365

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chang W-T, Huang C-W, Giang Y-S (1993) J Forensic Sci 38:843–863

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Armitage S, Saywell S, Roux C, Lennard C, Greenwood P (2001) J Forensic Sci 46:1043–1052

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bartick EG, Merrill RA, Egan WJ, Kochanowski BK, Morgan SL (1998) In: de Haseth JA (ed) Fourier transform spectroscopy: 11th Int Conf, American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, pp 257–259 (13 August 1997); AIP Conf Proc 430:257–259

  33. Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  34. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P (1987) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2:37–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Massart DL, Kaufman L (1989) The interpretation of analytical chemical data by the use of cluster analysis. Robert E. Krieger, Malabar

  36. Bratchell N (1989) Chemom. Intell Lab Syst 6:105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Everitt BS (1993) Cluster analysis, 3rd edn John Wiley, New York

  38. Hotelling H (1931) Ann Math Stat 2:360–378

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rencher AC (1995) Methods of multivariate analysis. John Wiley, New York

  40. Aldridge PK, Evans CL, Ward HW II, Colgan ST, Boyer N, Gemperline PJ (1996) Anal Chem 68:997–1002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Harris RJ (1994) ANOVA. An analysis of variance primer. FE Peacock, Itasca

  42. Sahota RS, Morgan SL (1993) Anal Chem 65:70–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1989) Using multivariate statistics, 2nd edn. Harper Collins, New York, p 379

  44. Davis JC (1986) Statistics and data analysis in geology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, p 498

  45. Fisher RA (1936) Ann Eugenics 7:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM (1979) Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, San Diego

  47. Campbell NA, Atchley WR (1981) Syst Zool 30:268–280

    Google Scholar 

  48. Perkins JH, Hasenoehrl EJ, Griffiths PR (1991) Anal Chem 63:1738–1747

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the FBI Academy and by award number 97-LB-VX-0006 from the Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U. S. Department of Justice. Portions of this work were presented at the 11th International Conferences on Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (Athens, GA, August 10–15, 1997) and at FACSS '97 (Providence, RI, 27–31 October, 1997).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward G. Bartick.

Additional information

This is publication number 03-04 of the Laboratory Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Names of commercial manufacturers are provided for identification only, and inclusion does not imply endorsement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egan, W.J., Galipo, R.C., Kochanowski, B.K. et al. Forensic discrimination of photocopy and printer toners. III. Multivariate statistics applied to scanning electron microscopy and pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 376, 1286–1297 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2099-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2099-3

Keywords

Navigation