Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Forensic discrimination of photocopy and printer toners I. The development of an infrared spectral library

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microscopical reflection-absorption by infrared spectroscopy (R-A IR) was shown as a viable technique for analyzing the polymer resins contained in dry, black photocopy and printer toners. The sampling technique involves a heat transfer of the toner from a document to the reflective surface of aluminum foil followed by analysis by R-A IR. The technique is simple, fast, and readily available to most forensic laboratories. A searchable spectral library was created that contains 807 toner samples analyzed by R-A IR. Ninety-eight groups were established based on spectral characteristics, and a flowchart was developed to assist with group assignments. A blind study was conducted to compare twenty photocopied documents each paired to a test document to determine if the pair could have been produced from the same copier. The analyst obtained 100% correct results in this study. Tests on thirty samples with the spectral library produced 90% first hits for the correct group. The three remaining samples were correctly determined by visual comparison of spectra for the top three hits. An actual case study was conducted where the investigation was narrowed from 400 possible machines to eight based on a comparative study of the photocopy toners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1A–C.
Fig. 2A–D.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5A–G.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cantu AA (1991) Anal Chem 63:847A–854A

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Totty RN (1990) Forensic Sci Int 46:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilmour CL (1994) Can Soc Forens Sci J 27:245–259

    Google Scholar 

  4. Totty RN (1990) Forensic Sci Rev 2:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kemp GS, Totty RN (1983) Forensic Sci Int 22:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  6. Williams RL (1983) Forensic Sci Int 22:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zimmerman J, Mooney D, Kimmett MJ (1986) J Forensic Sci 31:489–493

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tandon G, Jasuja OP, Sehgal VN (1997) J Forensic Document Examiners 3:119–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Trzcinska BM, BrozekMucha Z (1997) Mikrochim Acta Suppl 14:235–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lennard CJ, Mazzella WD (1991) J Forensic Sci Soc 31:365–371

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shiver FC, Nelson MS, Nelson LK (1991) J Forensic Sci 36:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mazzella WD, Lennard CJ, Margot PA (1991) J Forensic Sci 36:449–465

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mazzella WD, Lennard CJ, Margot PA (1991) J Forensic Sci 36:820–837

    Google Scholar 

  14. Andrasko J (1996) J Forensic Sci 41:812–823

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brandi J, James B, Gutowski SJ (1997) Int J Forensic Document Examiners 3:324–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartick EG, Merrill RA (1995) In: Jacob B, Bonte W (eds) Advances in forensic sciences, vol 3: Forensic criminalistics 1 (proceedings of the 13th meeting of the international association of forensic sciences, Dusseldorf, August 22nd to 28th, 1993) Verlag, Berlin, pp 310–313

  17. Andrasko J (1994) J Forensic Sci 39:226–230

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Moel JJM, Blokker P, Koeijer JA (2000) In: Second European academy of forensic science meeting, Cracow, (September 12–16, 2000)

  19. Merrill RA, Bartick EG, Mazzella WD (1996) J Forensic Sci 41:264–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Egan WJ, Morgan SL, Bartick EG, Merrill RA, Taylor III JH (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem

  21. Bartick EG, Merrill RA, Egan WJ, Kochanowski BK, Morgan SL (1998) In: de Haseth JA (ed) Fourier transform spectroscopy: 11th international conference, American institute of physics, Woodbury, NY, 1997, pp 257–259 (13 August 1997); also published as (1998) AIP Conference Proceedings 430:257–259

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Counterterrorism and Forensic Science Research Unit, FBI Academy, Quantico, VA 22135, USA

    Rena A. Merrill & Edward G. Bartick

  2. Questioned Documents Unit, FBI Laboratory, Quantico, VA 22135, USA

    J. Hollis Taylor III

Authors
  1. Rena A. Merrill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edward G. Bartick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Hollis Taylor III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward G. Bartick.

Additional information

This is publication number 03-02 of the Laboratory Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Names of commercial manufacturers are provided for identification only and inclusion does not imply endorsement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This paper was presented in part as a poster at the International Symposium on the Forensic Examination of Trace Evidence in Transition, San Antonio, Texas, 24–28 June 1996.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merrill, R.A., Bartick, E.G. & Taylor III, J.H. Forensic discrimination of photocopy and printer toners I. The development of an infrared spectral library. Anal Bioanal Chem 376, 1272–1278 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2073-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2073-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation