Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis and comparison of glass fragments by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and ICP-MS

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The discrimination potential of Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) is compared with previously reported solution ICP-MS methods using external calibration (EC) with internal standardization and a newly reported solution isotope dilution (ID) method for the analysis of two different glass populations. A total of 91 different glass samples were used for the comparison study; refractive index and elemental composition were measured by the techniques mentioned above. One set consisted of 45 headlamps taken from a variety of automobiles that represents a range of 20 years of manufacturing dates. A second set consisted of 46 automotive glasses (side windows, rear windows, and windshields) representing casework glass from different vehicle manufacturers over several years. The element menu for the LA-ICP-MS and EC-ICP-MS methods include Mg, Al, Ca, Mn, Ce, Ti, Zr, Sb, Ga, Ba, Rb, Sm, Sr, Hf, La, and Pb. The ID method was limited to the analysis of two isotopes each of Mg, Sr, Zr, Sb, Ba, Sm, Hf, and Pb. Laser ablation analyses were performed with a Q switched Nd:YAG, 266 nm, 6 mJ output energy laser. The laser was used in depth profile mode while sampling using a 50 μm spot size for 50 sec at 10 Hz (500 shots). The typical bias for the analysis of NIST 612 by LA-ICP-MS was less than 5% in all cases and typically better than 5% for most isotopes. The precision for the vast majority of the element menu was determined generally less than 10% for all the methods when NIST 612 was measured (40 μg g-1). Method detection limits (MDL) for the EC and LA-ICP-MS methods were similar and generally reported as less than 1 μg g-1 for the analysis of NIST 612. While the solution sample introduction methods using EC and ID presented excellent sensitivity and precision, these methods have the disadvantages of destroying the sample, and also involve complex sample preparation. The laser ablation method was simpler, faster, and produced comparable discrimination to the EC-ICP-MS and ID-ICP-MS. LA-ICP-MS can offer an excellent alternative to solution analysis of glass in forensic casework samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3a–c.
Fig. 4a, b.
Fig. 5a, b.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almirall J (1999) Elemental analysis of glass fragments. In: Caddy B (ed) Forensic examination of glass and paint. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 65–80

  2. Buscaglia J, Koons R (2001) Forensic Sci Comm Jan 3 (1)

  3. Duckworth DC, Morton SJ, Bayne K, Montero S, Koons RD, Almirall JR (2002) J Anal Atom Spectrom 17:662–668

    Google Scholar 

  4. Almirall J (2001) Glass as evidence of association. In: Houck M (ed) Mute witness; when trace evidence makes the case. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 139–155

  5. Stoecklein W, Becker S (2001) Proceedings of the 13th Interpol Forensic Science Symposium, October, 2001, Lyon, France

  6. Hughes JC, Catterick T, Southear G (1976) J Forensic Sci 8:217–227

    Google Scholar 

  7. Catterick T, Wall CD (1978) Talanta 25:573–577

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buscaglia J (1994) Anal Chim Acta 288:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koons RD, Peters CA, Rebbert PS (1991) J Anal At Spectrom 6:451–456

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman RF, Goode GC (1973) J Radiol Chem 15:367–388

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coleman RF, Weston NT (1968) J Forensic Sci Soc 8(1):32–33

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuisma-Kursula P (2000) X-Ray Spect 29:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zurhaar A, Mullings L (1990) J Anal Atom Spectrom 5:611

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parouchais T, Warner IM, Palmer LT, Kobus H (1996) J Forensic Sci (41):351

  15. Duckworth DC, Bayne CK, Morton S, Almirall JR (2000) J Anal Atom Spectrom 15:821–828

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koons R, Buscaglia J, Botrell M, Miller E (2002) Forensic glass comparisons. In: Saferstein R (ed) Forensic science handbook. Prentice Hall, New Jersey pp 180–211

  17. Smith DH (2000) Isotope dilution mass spectrometry. In: Barshick, Duckword DC, Smith DH (eds) Inorganic mass spectrometry. Dekker, New York, pp 223–239

  18. Fasset JD (1989) Anal Chem (61): 643A–649A

  19. Ebdon L, Hill SJ, Rivas C (1998) Spectrochim Acta B 53:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  20. Russo RE Laser ablation.(1998) In: Holcome J, Hiefte, G, Majidi V (eds) Focus on analytical spectrometry: a compendium of applied spectroscopy focal point articles (1994–1997). Society for Applied Spectroscopy: MD, pp 41–55

  21. Watling JR, Lynch BF, Herring D (1997) J Anal Atom Spectrom 12:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  22. Watling JR (1999) Spectroscopy Jun 14(6):16–32

    Google Scholar 

  23. GüntherD, Mermet JM (2000) Laser ablation for inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. In: Beauchemin D, Gregoire DC, Günther D, Karanassios V, Mermet JM, Wood TJ (eds) Discrete sample introduction techniques for inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Elsevier , London, pp 445–501

  24. Russo RE, Mao X, Lui H, Gonzalez J, Mao S (2002) Talanta 57:425–451

  25. Günther D, Guillong M (2002) J Anal Atom Spectrom 17(8):831–837

    Google Scholar 

  26. Figg D, Kahr MS (1997) Appl Spectrosc 51:1185

  27. Jeong SH, Borisov OV, Yoo JH, Mao XL, Russo RE (1999) Anal Chem 71:5123

  28. Figg D, Cross JB, Brink C (1998) Appl Surf Sci 129:287

    Google Scholar 

  29. ZX Chen (1999) J Anal Atom Spectrom 14:1823–1828

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mao XL, Ciocan C, Russo RE (1998) Appl Spectrosc 52 (7):913–918

    Google Scholar 

  31. Trejos T, Almirall JR (2003) J Anal Atom Spectrom (submitted)

  32. Mank AJ, Masson PR (1999) J Anal Atom Spectrom 14:1143–1153

    Google Scholar 

  33. Raith A, Godfrey R, Hutton C (1996) Fresenius J Anal Chem 354:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schroeder E, Hamester M, Kaiser M (1998) Appl Surf Sci 127–129:292–298

  35. Stix J, Gauthier G, Ludden J (1995) The Canadian Mineralogist 33:435–444

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pearce NJ, Perkins Wt, Westgate JA, Gorton MP, Jackson SE, Neal CR (1996) Geostand Newsl 21 (1):115–144

  37. Mason PRD, Mank AJG (2001) J Anal Atom Spectrom 16 (12):1381–1388

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tibi M, Heumann KG (2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 370:521

    Google Scholar 

  39. Becker JS, Temzler D (2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 370:637–640

    Google Scholar 

  40. American Society for Testing and Materials (2001) Standard test method for the automated determination of refractive index of glass samples using the oil immersion method and a phase contrast microscope. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM, West Conshohocken, pp 664–666

  41. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL (1978) Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Duxbury, Belmont, California, p 556

  42. Almirall J (1998) The evaluation of glass evidence by the statistical analysis of inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy and refractive index data. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow

  43. Montero S (2002) Trace elemental analysis of glass by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Ph.D. dissertation, Florida International University, Florida

  44. Fryer BJ, Jackson SE, Longerich HP (1995) Canadian Mineralogist 33:303–312

    Google Scholar 

  45. Longerich HP, Jackson SE, Gunther D (1996) J Anal Atom Spectrom 11:899–904

    Google Scholar 

  46. Norma MD, Pearson NJ, Sharma AL, Griffin WL (1996) Geostand Newsl 20:247–261

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements.

The authors would like to thank the Centre of Forensic Sciences in Toronto, Canada for supplying casework samples for analysis. Initial research on the application of elemental analysis by ICP-MS of glass evidence in our group was funded by the National Institute of Justice. The Technical Support Working Group (TSWG) under contract DAAD05–00-C-7128 to FIU, funded the more recent work on standard method development, isotope dilution method development and statistical analyses of database samples. CETAC, Inc. provided a partial instrument grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Forensic Research Institute and Department of Chemistry, Florida International University, University Park, Miami, FL , 33199, USA

    Tatiana Trejos, Shirly Montero & José R. Almirall

Authors
  1. Tatiana Trejos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shirly Montero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José R. Almirall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José R. Almirall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trejos, T., Montero, S. & Almirall, J.R. Analysis and comparison of glass fragments by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and ICP-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 376, 1255–1264 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-1968-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-1968-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation