Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent advances in the applications of forensic science to fire debris analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The forensic discipline of ignitable liquid and fire debris analysis is rapidly changing. Refinements in existing methods as well as development of new techniques are changing the routine methods of analysis. Optimization of existing extraction techniques and research into novel methods of extracting debris have improved the recovery of ignitable liquids from debris samples. The application of highly specialized instrumentation to problems of sensitivity and matrix interference has resulted in new ways of performing chemical analyses, allowing for improved limits of detection. Preliminary research in novel approaches to ignitable liquid comparisons is being evaluated, with the hopes of providing more detailed information to the field investigators. Research into a variety of areas related to fire debris analysis is ongoing, and will continue to improve the quality of ignitable liquid residue analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM E 1412–00 standard practice for separation and concentration of ignitable liquid residues from fire debris samples by passive headspace concentration. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA

  2. ASTM E 1413–00 standard practice for separation and concentration of ignitable liquid residues from fire debris samples by dynamic headspace concentration. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA

  3. ASTM E 1386–00 standard practice for separation and concentration of ignitable liquid residues from fire debris samples by solvent extraction. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA

  4. ASTM E 1388–00 standard practice for sampling headspace vapors from fire debris samples. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA

  5. ASTM E 2154–01 standard practice for separation and concentration of ignitable liquid residues from fire debris samples by passive headspace concentration with solid phase microextraction (SPME). American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA

  6. Keto RO, Wineman PL (1991) Anal Chem 63:1964–1971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ASTM E 1387–01 standard test method for ignitable liquid residues in extracts from fire debris by gas chromatography. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA

  8. ASTM E 1618–01 standard test method for ignitable liquid residues in extracts from fire debris by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA

  9. Newman RT, Dietz WR, Lothridge K (1996) J Forensic Sci 41:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  10. Water LV, Palmer LA (1993) J Forensic Sci 38:165–183

    Google Scholar 

  11. Newman RT (1995) An evaluation of multiple extractions of fire debris by passive diffusion. In: Abstracts of proceedings of the international symposium on the forensic aspects of arson investigation, US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation

  12. Lentini JJ, Armstrong AT (1997) J Forensic Sci 42:307–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Newman R, Dolan JA (2001) Solvent options for the desorption of activated charcoal in fire debris analysis. In: Abstracts of proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Meeting, B79, p 63

  14. Furton KG, Almirall JR, Bruna JC (1996) J Forensic Sci 41:12–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren QL, Bertsch W (1999) J Forensic Sci 44:504–515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. deVos BJ, Froneman M, Rohwer E, Sutherland DA (2002) J Forensic Sci 47:736–756

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutherland DA (1997) Can Soc Forensic Sci J 30:185–199

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frysinger GS, Gaines RB (2002) J Forensic Sci 47:471–482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodgers RP, Blumer EN, Freitas MA, Marshall AG (2001) J Forensic Sci 46:268–279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mann DC (1987) J Forensic Sci 32:606–615

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mann DC (1987) J Forensic Sci 32:616–628

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dolan JA, Ritacco CJ (2002) Gasoline comparisons by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry utilizing an automated approach to data analysis. In: Abstracts of proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Meeting, B70, p 62

  23. Forensic and geochemical analyses. http://www.zymaxforensics.com/text/services/analyses/eandp.htm. Cited 11 Feb 2003

  24. Jasper JP.(1999) Pharm Tech 23:106–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jasper JT, Edwards JS, Ford LC, Corry RA (2002) Fire Arson Investigator 51(2):30–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, Forensic Science Laboratory - Washington, 6000 Ammendale Road, Ammendale, MD 20705, USA

    J. Dolan

Authors
  1. J. Dolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Dolan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dolan, J. Recent advances in the applications of forensic science to fire debris analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem 376, 1168–1171 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-1890-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-1890-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation