Insight into substituent effects on the hydrolysis of amidines by a microhydration model
- 199 Downloads
The hydrolysis of substituted amidines XN′=CH–N(Y)2 (X = alkyl, nucleoside, aryl; Y = methyl, benzyl) is studied by use of computational techniques. For each substituted system, two possible pathways, N′-Path and N-Path, are considered, in which the proton transfer to N′ and N, respectively, after the nucleophilic attack of H2O to C=N′ double bond. The geometry optimizations of the stationary states are carried out to map out the hydrolysis pathways at the density functional theory B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level. Single-point MP2 calculations (MP2/6-311++G(d,p)//B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)) are performed to obtain more credible energy information. A microhydration surrounding is constructed to describe the effect of water molecules in the first hydration shell on the energy barrier from radial distribution functions, g(R). The bulk solvent effects are examined by using the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM). The calculated results indicate that the hydrolysis of N,N-disubstituted formamidines is more favored for Y = methyl than for Y = benzyl. Furthermore, for N′-substituted formamidines, the hydrolysis reactivity increases in the following order: X = aryl < X = nucleoside < X = alkyl. In addition, the substituent effects on the proton transfer manner after the nucleophilic attack of H2O to C=N′ double bond are discussed. The preference of proton transfer to N′ or N atom depends on the different nucleophilicity of each nitrogen atom bearing different substituents in the intermediate (IM). Our computational results are in agreement with the available experimental conclusion and will allow for a better understanding of the hydrolysis mechanism of amidines.
KeywordsAmidines Hydrolysis mechanism Substituent effect Microhydration model
This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21403021), the Fundamental and Advanced Research Foundation of Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (Grant Nos. cstc2013jcyjA20004, cstc2014jcyjA10019), and the Scientific Research Foundation of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. KJ130314).
- 18.Zhang C, Xue Y (2008) Sci China B 38:404–410Google Scholar
- 20.Zhang CH, Xue Y, Guo Y, Yan GS (2008) Chem J Chin Uinv 29:2354–2359Google Scholar
- 32.Jorgensen WL (1999) BOSS, Version 4.2, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
- 34.Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schleyer PVR, Pople JA (1986) Ab initio molecular orbital theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 39.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Peralta Jr JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2009) Gaussian 09. Revision D01. Gaussian, Inc, WallingfordGoogle Scholar