Abstract
Cloke and coworkers have recently (2006–2012) shown that reaction of carbon monoxide with organouranium compounds results in reductive coupling to yield the oligomeric anions C n O 2− n (n = 2, 3, 4). In order to explore the possibilities of similar reductive coupling of carbon monoxide in organolanthanide systems, the structures and thermochemistry of the cyclopentadienyllanthanide carbonyls Cp2Ln2(CO) n (n = 2, 3, 4, 5) have been investigated using lanthanum and lutetium, which are diamagnetic in the favored +3 oxidation state. All of these Cp2Ln2(CO) n structures have long Ln···Ln distances exceeding 4.2 Å for La and 3.6 Å for Lu, indicating the lack of direct metal–metal bonding and suggesting the normally favored +3 oxidation state for these lanthanides. In the dicarbonyls Cp2Ln2(CO)2, the two CO groups couple to form a bridging µ-C2O2 4− ligand, which can be derived by removal of four protons from glycolaldehyde (hydroxyacetaldehyde). Similarly, in the tricarbonyls, the three CO groups couple to form a bridging µ-C3O3 4− ligand, which can be derived by removal of four protons from hydroxypyruvaldehyde. However, the lowest energy structures for the tetracarbonyls Cp2Ln2(CO)4 (by more than 13 kcal/mol) have four separate η2-µ-CO ligands bonded to the central Ln2 unit through both their carbon and oxygen atoms. Thermochemistry of the Cp2Ln2(CO) n systems suggests viability of Cp2Ln2(CO)2 and Cp2Ln2(CO)4. However, Cp2Ln2(CO)3 is predicted to be disfavored relative to disproportionation into Cp2Ln2(CO)2 + Cp2Ln2(CO)4.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xie H, Wang J, Qin Z, Shi L, Tang Z, Xing X (2014) J Phys Chem A 118:9380
Ricks AM, Gagliardi L, Duncan MA (2010) J Am Chem Soc 132:15905
Gardner BM, Liddle ST (2013) Eur J Inorg Chem 2013(22–23):3753
La Pierre HS, Meyer K (2014) Prog Inorg Chem 58:303
Arnold PL, Turner ZR, Bellabarba RM, Tooze RP (2011) Chem Sci 2:77
Gardner BM, Stewart JC, Davis AL, McMaster J, Lewis W, Blake AJ, Liddle ST (2012) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:9265
Summerscales OT, Cloke FGN, Hitchcock PB, Green JC, Hazari N (2006) Science 311:829
Summerscales OT, Cloke FGN, Hitchcock PB, Green JC, Hazari N (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:9602
Frey AS, Cloke FGN, Hitchcock PB, Day IJ, Green JC, Aitken G (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:13681
Aitken G, Hazari N, Frey ASP, Cloke FGN, Summerscales OT, Green JC (2011) Dalton Trans 40:11080
McKay D, Frey ASP, Green JC, Cloke FGN, Maron L (2012) Chem Comm 48:4118
Li H, Feng H, Sun W, King RB, Schaefer HF (2013) Inorg Chem 2:6893
Li H, Feng H, Sun W, King RB, Schaefer HF (2014) New J Chem 38:6031
Federoňko M, Temkovic P, Konigstein J, Kováčik V, Tvaroška I (1980) Carbohydr Res 87:35
Evans WL, Waring CE (1926) J Am Chem Soc 48:2678
Hesse G, Ramisch F, Renner K (1956) Chem Ber 89:2137
Reeves HC, Ajl SJJ (1965) Biol Chem 240:569
Brynda M, Gagliardi L, Widmark PO, Power PP, Roos BO (2006) Angew Chem Int Ed 45:3804
Sieffert N, Bühl M (2010) J Am Chem Soc 132:8056
Schyman P, Lai W, Chen H, Wang Y, Shaik S (2011) J Am Chem Soc 133:7977
Adams RD, Pearl WC, Wong YO, Zhang Q, Hall MB, Walensky JR (2011) J Am Chem Soc 133:12994
Lonsdale R, Olah J, Mulholland AJ, Harvey JN (2011) J Am Chem Soc 133:15464
Crawford L, Cole-Hamilton DJ, Drent E, Bühl M (2014) Chem Eur J 20:13923
Zhekova H, Krykunov M, Autschbach J, Ziegler T (2014) J Chem Theory Comput 10:3299
Becke AD (1988) Phys Rev A 38:3098
Perdew JP (1986) Phys Rev B 33:882
Tsipis AC, Kefalidis CE, Tsipis CA (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:9144
Infante I, Raab J, Lyon JT, Liang B, Andrews L, Gagliardi LJ (2007) Phys Chem A 111:11996
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2006) J Chem Phys 125:194101
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) Theory Chem Acc 120:215
Cao X, Dolg M (2001) J Chem Phys 115:7348
Cao X, Dolg M (2002) J Mol Struct 581:139
Schaefer A, Horn H, Ahlrichs R (1992) J Chem Phys 97:2571
Schaefer A, Huber C, Ahlrichs R (1994) J Chem Phys 100:5829
Frisch MJ et al (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.02. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford
Papas BN, Schaefer HF (2006) J Mol Struct 768:275
Sunderlin LS, Wang D, Squires RR (1993) J Am Chem Soc 115:12060
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the support of the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 11447228 and 11174236), the Natural Science Foundation of the Department of Education in Sichuan Province of China (Grant No. 15ZB0129), the Funds for Sichuan Distinguished Scientists (Grant No. 2015JQ0042—China), the Funds for the Youth Innovation Team of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 14TD0013—China), the Program of the Key Scientific Research in Xihua University (Grant No. z1313320), Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 05020732—China), and the US National Science Foundation (Grants CHE-1057466 and CHE-1361178).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Feng, H., Sun, W. et al. Reductive coupling of carbon monoxide to glycolaldehyde and hydroxypyruvaldehyde polyanions in binuclear cyclopentadienyl lanthanum and lutetium derivatives: analogies to cyclooctatetraene thorium chemistry. Theor Chem Acc 135, 22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-015-1797-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-015-1797-1