Abstract
Two different theoretical approaches have been used for the description of the experimentally observed dual luminescence of 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP), introducing solvent effects with the polarizable continuum model (PCM), which seems needed to represent the dual fluorescence in polar media. These approaches are the linear response time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) and the state-specific complete active space self-consistent field. Both levels of theory represent the expected planar high-energy and the twisted intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) low-energy excited-state structures in the presence of solvent (toluene and acetonitrile). The comparison between both approaches shows that the main distortion of the ICT state is similar for both cases, i.e. twisting to almost 90º of the pyridine ring and the dimethylamino planes, but that other secondary distortions are slightly different. In the case of the TDDFT approach, the geometry optimizations of DMAP in the ground and excited states have been carried out using the conventional linear response approach (LR-PCM) for the solvent inclusion. The LR-PCM and the specific state (SS-PCM) approaches have been used for the prediction of the excitation and emission energies of DMAP in toluene and acetonitrile. The prediction of the emission energies at TDDFT/LR-PCM and CASPT2/PCM (complete active space perturbation theory) levels agrees with the experimental ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The computation of conical intersections under the CASSCF framework is not available using the PCM in our available software. The CI points are approximated as state averaged optimizations in S1.
References
Lippert E, Lüder W, Moll F, Nägele W, Boos H, Prigge H, Seibold-Blankenstein I (1961) Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 73:695
Chandross EA, Thomas HT (1971) Chem Phys Lett 9:397
Chandross EA (1975) The exciplex. Academic Press, New York
Visser RJ, Varma CAGO (1980) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 76:453
Visser RJ, Varma CAGO, Konijnenberg J, Bergwerf P (1983) J Chem Soc. Faraday Trans 79:347
Visser RJ, Varma CAGO, Konijnenberg J, Weisenborn PCM (1984) J Mol Struct 114:105
Khalil OS, Hofeldt RH, McGlynn SP (1972) Chem Phys Lett 17:479
Khalil OS, Hofeldt RH, McGlynn SP (1973) J Lumin 6:229
Khalil OS, Hofeldt RH, McGlynn SP (1973) Spectrosc Lett 6:147
Rotkiewicz K, Grellmann KH, Grabowski ZR (1973) Chem Phys Lett 19:315
Kosower EM, Dodiuk H (1976) J Am Chem Soc 98:924
Cazeau-Dubroca C, Peirigua A, Lyazidi SA, Nouchi G (1983) Chem Phys Lett 98:511
Cazeau-Dubroca C, Ait Lyazidi S, Nouchi G, Peirigua A (1986) Nouv J Chim 10:337
Sobolewski AL, Domcke W (1996) Chem Phys Lett 259:119
Sobolewski AL, Domcke W (1996) Chem Phys Lett 250:428
Schuddeboom W, Jonker SA, Warman JM, Leinhos U, Kühnle W, Zachariasse KA (1992) J Phys Chem 96:10809
Zachariasse KA (2000) Chem Phys Lett 320:8
Guido CA, Mennucci B, Jacquemin D, Adamo C (2010) Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:8016
Szydlowska I, Kyrychenko A, Gorski A, Waluk J, Herbich J (2003) Photochem Photobiol Sci 2:187
Szydlowska I, Kyrychenko A, Nowacki J, Herbich J (2003) Phys Chem Chem Phys 5:1032
Jamorski Jödicke C, Lüthi HP (2003) Chem Phys Lett 368:561
Zilberg S, Haas Y (2002) J Phys Chem A 106:1
Dreyer J, Kummrow A (2000) J Am Chem Soc 122:2577
Serrano-Andres L, Merchan M, Roos BO, Lindh R (1995) J Am Chem Soc 117:3189
Rappoport D, Furche F (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:1277
Köhn A, Hättig C (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:7399
Galván IF, Martín ME, Aguilar MA (2010) J Chem Theory Comput 6:2445
Herbich J, Grabowski ZR, Wójtowicz H, Golankiewicz K (1989) J Phys Chem 93:3439
Mishina S, Takayanagi M, Nakata M, Otsuki J, Araki K (2001) J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 141:153
Pedone A (2013) J Chem Comput Theory 9:4087
Cammi R, Corni S, Mennucci B, Tomasi J (2005) J Chem Phys 122:104513
Scalmani G, Frisch MJ, Mennucci B, Tomasi J, Cammi R, Barone V (2006) J Chem Phys 124:094107
Sampedro D (2011) In: Maes KJ, Willems JM (eds) Photochemistry: UV/VIS spectroscopy, photochemical reactions, and photosynthesis. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA Jr, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam MJ, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2009) Gaussian 09 revision D.01. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford
Tawada Y, Tsuneda T, Yanagisawa S, Yanai T, Hirao K (2004) J Chem Phys 120:8425
Weigend F, Häser M, Patzelt H, Ahlrichs R (1998) Chem Phys Lett 294:143
Karlström G, Lindh R, Malmqvist PÅ, Roos BO, Ryde U, Veryazov V, Widmark PO, Cossi M, Schimmelpfennig B, Neogrady P, Seijo L (2003) Comput Mater Sci 28:222
Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R (2005) Chem Rev 105:2999
Widmark P, Malmqvist P, Roos BO (1990) Theory Chem Acc 77:291
Bearpark MJ, Robb MA, Schlegel HB (1994) Chem Phys Lett 223:269
Szydlowska I, Kubicki J, Herbich J (2005) Photochem Photobiol Sci 4:106
Churakov AV, Karlov SS. Private communication to the Cambridge structural database, deposition number CCDC 801515
Acknowledgments
The D.G.I.(MEC)/FEDER (CTQ2013-48635-C2-2-P and CTQ2011-24800) projects are acknowledged for financial support. E. Manso thanks the MINECO for a FPU grant. We thank the Centro de Supercomputación de Galicia (CESGA) for computational resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
214_2015_1659_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Table S1 displays the experimental and calculated (TDDFT and CASSCF) main distances for DMAP in the ground (S0) and lowest singlet excited states HE and LE both in the gas phase or introducing the solvents toluene and acetonitrile using the PCM model. The xyz coordinates of the fully optimized computed structures for the critical points for DMAP in the gas phase, toluene, and acetonitrile. TD-DFT electronic excitations in toluene and acetonitrile using LR-PCM and SS-PCM approaches (DOCX 42 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López-de-Luzuriaga, J.M., Manso, E., Monge, M. et al. Dual fluorescence of 4-(dimethylamino)-pyridine: a comparative linear response TDDFT versus state-specific CASSCF study including solvent with the PCM model. Theor Chem Acc 134, 55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-015-1659-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-015-1659-x