Abstract
The present experiment investigated the ability of the opiate receptor antagonist naltrexone to block the increased locomotion and rearing produced acutely by amphetamine as well as the sensitization of these responses produced when this drug is administered repeatedly. Rats in different groups received an injection of amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, IP) or saline preceded 30 min earlier by an injection of naltrexone (0, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg, IP). Naltrexone dose-dependently reduced the rearing but had no effect on the locomotion produced by this dose of amphetamine. The locomotion and rearing observed following saline were not affected. This pattern of results was observed following each of six additional pairs of injections, one pair of injections given every third day. Once, soon (2–4 days) and once, long (9–12 days) after the last injection, all animals were injected with amphetamine (0.75 mg/kg, IP) in the absence of naltrexone (tests for sensitization). Animals having been pre-exposed to amphetamine preceded by naltrexone showed no evidence of sensitized rearing on either test, indicating that naltrexone blocked sensitization of this response to amphetamine. These animals, however, exhibited sensitized locomotion on both tests. These results suggest an important but complex role for dopamine-opioid interactions not only in the production of acute locomotor responding to amphetamine but also in the sensitization of locomotor responding when this drug is administered repeatedly. The present findings also suggest that amphetamine-induced rearing is more dependent than locomotion on neuronal mechanisms involving dopamine-opioid interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 12 March 1996 / Final version: 2 January 1997
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balcells-Olivero, M., Vezina, P. Effects of naltrexone on amphetamine-induced locomotion and rearing: acute and repeated injections. Psychopharmacology 131, 230–238 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050288
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050288