Abstract
Rationale: Repeated administration of psychostimulants such as amphetamine (AMPH) produces an enduring augmentation of their locomotor effects. Previous research suggests that this phenomenon, termed sensitization, is related to changes within the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system. Objectives: The present experiments were designed to investigate the contribution of endogenous cholecystokinin (CCK), a neuropeptide co-localized with DA in the mesolimbic system, to the development (experiment 1) and the expression (experiment 2) of locomotor sensitization to AMPH. Methods: In experiment 1, rats were injected (IP) with the CCKA antagonist devazepide (0, 0.001, 0.01, or 0.1 mg/kg) or the CCKB antagonist L-365,260 (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, or 1.0 mg/kg) followed by AMPH (1.5 mg/kg) once daily for seven days. Following 10 days withdrawal, rats were administered AMPH (0.75 mg/kg) and their locomotor activity recorded. In experiment 2, rats were administered AMPH (1.5 mg/kg) once daily for 7 days. Following 10 days withdrawal, rats were injected with devazepide (0, 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, or 1.0 mg/kg) or L-365,260 (0, 0.001, 0.01, or 0.1 mg/kg) followed 30 min later by AMPH (0.75 mg/kg) and their locomotor activity recorded. Results: When administered during the AMPH pretreatment phase of experiment 1, the two highest doses of L-365,260 attenuated, and the lowest dose of L-365,260 potentiated, the sensitized locomotor response to AMPH challenge. When administered prior to the AMPH challenge phase of experiment 2, devazepide attenuated the sensitized locomotor response to AMPH. Conclusions: These results suggest that CCKB and CCKA receptors modulate the development and the expression of behavioral sensitization to AMPH, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 27 August 1999 / Accepted: 29 February 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wunderlich, G., DeSousa, N. & Vaccarino, F. Cholecystokinin modulates both the development and the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine in the rat. Psychopharmacology 151, 283–290 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130000445
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130000445