Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Methamphetamine alters nucleus accumbens neural activation to monetary loss in healthy young adults

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Stimulant drugs like methamphetamine (MA) activate brain reward circuitry, which is linked to the development of problematic drug use. It is not clear how drugs like MA alter neural response to a non-drug reward.

Objectives

We examined how acute MA impacts neural response to receipt of a monetary reward relative to a loss in healthy adults. We hypothesized that MA (vs. placebo) would increase mesolimbic neural activation to reward, relative to loss.

Methods

In a within-subject, randomized, cross-over, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, 41 healthy adults completed the Doors monetary reward task during fMRI after ingestion of placebo or 20 mg MA. We examined drug effects on neural response to reward receipt (Win vs. Loss) using a priori anatomical striatal regions of interest (nucleus accumbens (NAcc), caudate, putamen).

Results

MA decreased NAcc BOLD activation to reward vs loss compared to placebo (p=.007) without altering caudate or putamen BOLD activation. Similar effects for reward vs. loss were obtained using whole brain analysis. Additional exploratory ROI analysis comparing reward and loss activation relative to a neutral “fixation” period indicated that MA increased NAcc BOLD activation during loss trials, without decreasing activation during win trials.

Conclusions

This preliminary evidence suggests that MA increases NAcc neural response to the receipt of monetary loss. Additional studies are needed to replicate our findings and clarify the mechanisms contributing to altered mesolimbic neural response to reward and loss receipt during stimulant intoxication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abi-Dargham A, Kegeles LS, Martinez D, Innis RB, Laruelle M (2003) Dopamine mediation of positive reinforcing effects of amphetamine in stimulant naive healthy volunteers: results from a large cohort. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 13:459–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson JL, Skare S, Ashburner J (2003) How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 20:870–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork JM, Chen G, Smith AR, Hommer DW (2010) Incentive-elicited mesolimbic activation and externalizing symptomatology in adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51:827–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin SJ, Weigard AS, Hardee JE, Cope LM, Martz ME, Zucker RA, Heitzeg MM (2022) Sex moderates reward- and loss-related neural correlates of triarchic-model traits and antisocial behavior. Clin Psychol Sci 10:700–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Z, Bennett M, Orr C, Icke I, Banaschewski T, Barker GJ, Bokde AL, Bromberg U, Büchel C, Quinlan EB, Desrivières S (2019) Mapping adolescent reward anticipation, receipt, and prediction error during the monetary incentive delay task. Hum Brain Mapp 40:262–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson JM, Foti D, Mujica-Parodi LR, Harmon-Jones E, Hajcak G (2011) Ventral striatal and medial prefrontal BOLD activation is correlated with reward-related electrocortical activity: a combined ERP and fMRI study. Neuroimage 57:1608–1616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox RW (1996) AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 29:162–73. https://doi.org/10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crane NA, Gorka SM, Weafer J, Langenecker SA, de Wit H, Phan KL (2018) Neural activation to monetary reward is associated with amphetamine reward sensitivity. Neuropsychopharmacology 43:1738–1744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit H, Phillips TJ (2012) Do initial responses to drugs predict future use or abuse? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:1565–1576

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado MR, Nystrom LE, Fissell C, Noll DC, Fiez JA (2000) Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum. J Neurophysiol 84:3072–3077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drevets WC, Gautier C, Price JC, Kupfer DJ, Kinahan PE, Grace AA, Price JL, Mathis CA (2001) Amphetamine-induced dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria. Biol Psychiatry 49:81–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischman MW, Foltin RW (1991) Utility of subjective-effects measurements in assessing abuse liability of drugs in humans. Br J Addict 86:1563–1570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes EE, Rodriguez EE, Musselman S, Narendran R (2014) Prefrontal response and frontostriatal functional connectivity to monetary reward in abstinent alcohol-dependent young adults. PloS One 9:e94640

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Foti D, Hajcak G (2009) Depression and reduced sensitivity to non-rewards versus rewards: evidence from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 81:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foti D, Weinberg A, Dien J, Hajcak G (2011) Event-related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from nonrewards: temporospatial principal components analysis and source localization of the feedback negativity. Hum Brain Mapp 32:2207–2216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin AA, Kim JH (2021) Age of onset and its related factors in cocaine or methamphetamine use in adults from the United States: results from NHANES 2005-2018. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(22):12259

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haber SN, Knutson B (2010) The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:4–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hajcak G, Moser JS, Holroyd CB, Simons RF (2006) The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biol Psychol 71:148–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Han B, Compton WM, Jones CM, Einstein EB, Volkow ND (2021) Methamphetamine use, methamphetamine use disorder, and associated overdose deaths among US adults. JAMA Psychiatry 78:1329–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heitzeg MM, Cope LM, Martz ME, Hardee JE (2015) Neuroimaging risk markers for substance abuse: recent findings on inhibitory control and reward system functioning. Curr Addict Rep 2:91–103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov I, Liu X, Shulz K, Fan J, London E, Friston K, Halperin JM, Newcorn JH (2012) Parental substance abuse and function of the motivation and behavioral inhibition systems in drug-naive youth. Psychiatry Res 201:128–135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH (1980) Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 71:275–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson B, Bjork JM, Fong GW, Hommer D, Mattay VS, Weinberger DR (2004) Amphetamine modulates human incentive processing. Neuron 43:261–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koob GF, Volkow ND (2016) Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 3:760–773

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Langenecker SA, Kling LR, Crane NA, Gorka SM, Nusslock R, Damme KSF, Weafer J, de Wit H, Phan KL (2020) Anticipation of monetary reward in amygdala, insula, caudate are predictors of pleasure sensitivity to d-Amphetamine administration. Drug Alcohol Depend 206:107725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leyton M, Boileau I, Benkelfat C, Diksic M, Baker G, Dagher A (2002) Amphetamine-induced increases in extracellular dopamine, drug wanting, and novelty seeking: a PET/[11C] raclopride study in healthy men. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:1027–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luijten M, Schellekens AF, Kuhn S, Machielse MW, Sescousse G (2017) Disruption of reward processing in addiction : an image-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. JAMA Psychiatry 74(4):387–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manza P, Shokri-Kojori E, Wiers CE, Kroll D, Feldman D, McPherson K, Biesecker E, Dennis E, Johnson A, Kelleher A, Qu S, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2022) Sex differences in methylphenidate-induced dopamine increases in ventral striatum. Mol Psychiatry 27:939–946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall BD, Galea S, Wood E, Kerr T (2011) Injection methamphetamine use is associated with an increased risk of attempted suicide: a prospective cohort study. Drug Alcohol Depend 119:134–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR (1971) Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 12:245–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez D, Slifstein M, Broft A, Mawlawi O, Hwang DR, Huang Y, Cooper T, Kegeles L, Zarahn E, Abi-Dargham A, Haber SN, Laruelle M (2003) Imaging human mesolimbic dopamine transmission with positron emission tomography. Part II: amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the functional subdivisions of the striatum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 23:285–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo LM, de Wit H (2015) Acquisition of responses to a methamphetamine-associated cue in healthy humans: self-report, behavioral, and psychophysiological measures. Neuropsychopharmacology 40:1734–1741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miller EM, Shankar MU, Knutson B, McClure SM (2014) Dissociating motivation from reward in human striatal activity. J Cogn Neurosci 26:1075–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NIDA (2017) Trends & Statistics. https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics. Accessed 11 Nov 2022

  • NIDA (2019) Methamphetamine research report. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/methamphetamine/what-are-long-term-effects-methamphetamine-misuse. Accessed 11 Nov 2022

  • O’Daly OG, Joyce D, Tracy DK, Azim A, Stephan KE, Murray RM, Shergill SS (2014) Amphetamine sensitization alters reward processing in the human striatum and amygdala. PloS One 9:e93955

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald LM, Wong DF, McCaul M, Zhou Y, Kuwabara H, Choi L, Brasic J, Wand GS (2005) Relationships among ventral striatal dopamine release, cortisol secretion, and subjective responses to amphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:821–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proudfit GH (2015) The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression. Psychophysiology 52:449–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radoman M, Crane NA, Gorka SM, Weafer J, Langenecker SA, de Wit H, Phan KL (2021) Striatal activation to monetary reward is associated with alcohol reward sensitivity. Neuropsychopharmacology 46:343–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redish AD (2004) Addiction as a computational process gone awry. Science 306:1944–1947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW, Cador M, Taylor JR, Everitt BJ (1989) Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13:155–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET, Huang CC, Lin CP, Feng J, Joliot M (2020) Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. Neuroimage 206:116189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23(Suppl 1):S208–S219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stice E, Yokum S (2014) Brain reward region responsivity of adolescents with and without parental substance use disorders. Psychol Addict Behav 28:805–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stice E, Yokum S, Burger KS (2013) Elevated reward region responsivity predicts future substance use onset but not overweight/obesity onset. Biol Psychiatry 73:869–876

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Ding YS, Gatley SJ (2002) Role of dopamine in the therapeutic and reinforcing effects of methylphenidate in humans: results from imaging studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 12:557–566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webber HE, Lopez-Gamundi P, Stamatovich SN, de Wit H, Wardle MC (2021) Using pharmacological manipulations to study the role of dopamine in human reward functioning: A review of studies in healthy adults. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 120:123–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White TL, Justice AJ, de Wit H (2002) Differential subjective effects of D-amphetamine by gender, hormone levels and menstrual cycle phase. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 73:729–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock EA, Zakiniaeiz Y, Morris ED, Cosgrove KP (2020) Sex and the dopaminergic system: Insights from addiction studies. Handb Clin Neurol 175:141–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

The contents of the paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIDA, NIGMS, or the National Institutes of Health.

Funding

This publication was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (R01DA002812, PI: HdW). NAC was supported by NIDA (K23DA048132, PI: NAC). HM was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) (T32GM07019). Dr. de Wit has served on Scientific Advisory committees for Gilgamesh Pharmaceuticals, Awakn Life Sciences and MIND Foundation, and she is on the Board of Directors of PharmAla Biotech.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and take responsibility for authorship and publication. NAC conducted the statistical analyses, interpreted the data, and wrote the initial draft of the paper. HM made substantial contributions to the data analysis and writing of the manuscript. HDW was the principal investigator of the study, contributed to the conceptual design of the study, made important contributions to the editing of the paper, and assisted in data interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natania A. Crane.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crane, N.A., Molla, H. & de Wit, H. Methamphetamine alters nucleus accumbens neural activation to monetary loss in healthy young adults. Psychopharmacology 240, 1891–1900 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06398-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06398-4

Keywords

Navigation