Abstract
Rationale
Dominant theoretical models postulate the presence of an automatic attentional bias (AB) towards alcohol-related stimuli in alcohol use disorder, such AB constituting a core feature of this disorder. An early alcohol AB has been documented in subclinical populations such as binge drinking (i.e., a drinking pattern prevalent in youth and characterized by repeated alternation between alcohol intoxications and withdrawals, generating cerebral consequences). However, the automatic nature of AB remains to be established.
Objectives
We investigated the automatic nature of AB in binge drinkers through the saccadic choice task. This eye-tracking paradigm consistently highlights the extremely fast and involuntary saccadic responses elicited by faces in humans, relative to other object categories. Through an alcohol-related adaptation of the saccadic choice task, we tested whether the early and automatic capture of attentional resources elicited by faces can also be found for alcohol-related stimuli in binge drinkers, as predicted by theoretical models.
Methods
Forty-three binge drinkers and 44 control participants performed two versions of the saccadic choice task. In the original version, two images (a face, a vehicle) were displayed on the left and right side of the screen respectively. Participants had to perform a saccade as fast as possible towards the target stimulus (either face or vehicle). In the alcohol-related version, the task was identical, but the images were an alcoholic beverage and a non-alcoholic stimulus.
Results
We replicated the automatic attraction towards faces in both groups, as faces generated higher saccadic accuracy, speed, and amplitude than vehicles, as well as higher corrective saccade proportion. Concerning the alcohol-related adaptation of the task, groups did not differ for the accuracy, speed, and amplitude of the first saccade towards alcohol. However, binge drinkers differed from controls regarding the proportion of corrective saccade towards non-alcoholic stimuli after an error saccade towards alcohol, suggesting the presence of an alcohol disengagement bias specific to binge drinkers.
Conclusions
Alcohol-related AB in binge drinkers is not characterized by an early and automatic hijacking of attention towards alcohol. This AB rather relies on later and more controlled processing stages, namely a difficulty to disengage attentional resources from alcohol-related stimuli.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Raw data of the present study are available upon request.
Notes
We performed correlations between alcohol consumption during the day before the experiment (i.e., number of alcohol units) and alcohol-related AB, since previous studies showed that acute alcohol consumption could induce alcohol-related AB in social drinkers (Duka & Townshend, 2004). For the alcohol vs. flower task, results showed no correlation with the accuracy of the first saccade (r = .180, p = .103), the proportion of corrective saccade (r = .148, p = .183), the latency of the first saccade (r = − .087, p = .432), or the latency of the corrective saccade (r = .113, p = .307).
Alcohol-related pictures presented higher relative luminance (0.51 ± 0.12 vs. 0.42 ± 0.12; t62 = 2.943, p = .005, d = .736) than flower pictures, but they were matched on RMS contrast (p = .394). This resulted in 72% of trials containing a pair of stimuli with alcohol-related pictures showing higher relative luminance than flower pictures. This difference however did not interfere with participants’ performance, as saccadic reaction time of the first saccade did not correlate with the relative luminance of the picture fixated (r = − .060, p = .576).
References
Albery IP (2015) Testing a frequency of exposure hypothesis in attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli amongst social drinkers. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 5
Almeida‐Antunes N, Antón‐Toro L, Crego A, Rodrigues R, Sampaio A, López‐Caneda E (2022) « It’s a beer! »: brain functional hyperconnectivity during processing of alcohol‐related images in young binge drinkers. Addiction Biology, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.13152
Ataya AF, Adams S, Mullings E, Cooper RM, Attwood AS, Munafò MR (2012) Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias. Drug Alcohol Depend 121(1–2):148–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.023
Bechara A (2005) Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci 8(11):1458–1463. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1584
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK (1998) Beck depression inventory manual, 2nd edn. Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris
Blanco-Ramos J, Cadaveira F, Folgueira-Ares R, Corral M, Rodríguez Holguín S (2019) Electrophysiological correlates of an alcohol-cued go/nogo task: a dual-process approach to binge drinking in university students. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(22):4550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224550
Bollen Z, Field M, Billaux P, Maurage P (2022) Attentional bias in alcohol drinkers: a systematic review of its link with consumption variables. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 139:104703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104703
Bollen Z, Masson N, Salvaggio S, D’Hondt F, Maurage P (2020) Craving is everything: an eye-tracking exploration of attentional bias in binge drinking. J Psychopharmacol, 026988112091313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881120913131
Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat vis 10(4):433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
Bruchon-Schweitzer M, Paulhan I (1993) Adaptation francophone de l’inventaire d’anxiété Trait-Etat (Forme Y) de Spielberger. Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris
Carbia C, López-Caneda E, Corral M, Cadaveira F (2018) A systematic review of neuropsychological studies involving young binge drinkers. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 90:332–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.013
Christiansen P, Mansfield R, Duckworth J, Field M, Jones A (2015) Internal reliability of the alcohol-related visual probe task is increased by utilising personalised stimuli and eye-tracking. Drug Alcohol Depend 155:170–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.672
Crego A, Holguín SR, Parada M, Mota N, Corral M, Cadaveira F (2009) Binge drinking affects attentional and visual working memory processing in young university students. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res, 33(11), 1870‑1879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01025.x
Crouzet SM, Kirchner H, Thorpe SJ (2010) Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. J vis 10(16):1–17
DePalma FM, Ceballos N, Graham R (2017) Attentional blink to alcohol cues in binge drinkers versus non-binge drinkers. Addict Behav 73:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.04.020
Devillez H, Guyader N, Curran T, O’Reilly RC (2020) The bimodality of saccade duration during the exploration of visual scenes. Vis Cogn 28(9):484–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1830325
Elton A, Faulkner ML, Robinson DL, Boettiger CA (2021) Acute depletion of dopamine precursors in the human brain: effects on functional connectivity and alcohol attentional bias. Neuropsychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-00993-9
Field M, Hogarth L, Bleasdale D, Wright P, Fernie G, Christiansen P (2011) Alcohol expectancy moderates attentional bias for alcohol cues in light drinkers. Addiction 106(6):1097–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03412.x
Field M, Mogg K, Mann B, Bennett GA, Bradley BP (2013) Attentional biases in abstinent alcoholics and their association with craving. Psychol Addict Behav 27(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029626
Field M, Mogg K, Zetteler J, Bradley BP (2004) Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology 176(1):88–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-1855-1
Foulsham T, Gray A, Nasiopoulos E, Kingstone A (2013) Leftward biases in picture scanning and line bisection: a gaze-contingent window study. Vision Res 78:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.001
Franken IHA (2003) Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 27(4):563–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00081-2
Gache P, Michaud P, Landry U, Accietto C, Arfaoui S, Wenger O, Daeppen J-B (2005) The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) as a screening tool for excessive drinking in primary care: reliability and validity of a French version. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res, 29(11), 2001‑2007. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.alc.0000187034.58955.64
Gladwin TE, ter Mors-Schulte MHJ, Ridderinkhof KR, Wiers RW (2013) Medial parietal cortex activation related to attention control involving alcohol cues. Front Psych, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00174
Guyader N, Chauvin A, Boucart M, Peyrin C (2017) Do low spatial frequencies explain the extremely fast saccades towards human faces? Vision Res 133:100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.12.019
Hallgren K, McCrady B (2013) Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers. J Behav Health 2(2):112. https://doi.org/10.5455/jbh.20130224082728
Heitmann J, Jonker NC, Ostafin BD, de Jong PJ (2020) Attentional bias for alcohol cues in visual search-Increased engagement, difficulty to disengage or both? PloS One, 15(1), e0228272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228272
Hoffmann A, Büsel C, Ritter M, Sachse P (2021) Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the antisaccade paradigm. Cogn Emot 35(8):1626–1633. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.1979475
Kauffmann L, Khazaz S, Peyrin C, Guyader N (2021) Isolated face features are sufficient to elicit ultra-rapid and involuntary orienting responses toward faces. J vis 21(2):4. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.2.4
Kauffmann L, Peyrin C, Chauvin A, Entzmann L, Breuil C, Guyader N (2019) Face perception influences the programming of eye movements. Sci Rep 9(1):560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36510-0
King AC, Byars JA (2004) Alcohol-induced performance impairment in heavy episodic and light social drinkers. J Stud Alcohol, 65(1), 27‑36. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2004.65.27
Kirchner H, Thorpe SJ (2006) Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. Vision Res 46:1762–1776
Langbridge JE, Jones RD, Canales JJ (2019) A neurophysiological and behavioral assessment of interventions targeting attention bias and sense of control in binge drinking. Front Hum Neurosci 12:538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00538
Lannoy S, Baggio S, Heeren A, Dormal V, Maurage P, Billieux J (2021) What is binge drinking? Insights from a network perspective. Add Behav 117:106848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106848
Lannoy S, Billieux J, Dormal V, Maurage P (2019) Behavioral and cerebral impairments associated with binge drinking in youth: a critical review. Psychologica Belgica 59(1):116–155. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.476
Lannoy S, Dormal V, Billieux J, Brion M, D’Hondt F, Maurage P (2020) A dual‐process exploration of binge drinking: evidence through behavioral and electrophysiological findings. Add Biol, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12685
Lees B, Mewton L, Stapinski LA, Squeglia LM, Rae CD, Teesson M (2019) Neurobiological and cognitive profile of young binge drinkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rev 29(3):357–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09411-w
Lopez-Caneda E, Cadaveira F, Crego A, Doallo S, Corral M, Gomez-Suarez A, Rodriguez Holguin S (2013) Effects of a persistent binge drinking pattern of alcohol consumption in young people: a follow-up study using event-related potentials. Alcohol Alcohol 48(4):464–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agt046
López-Caneda E, Rodríguez Holguín S, Cadaveira F, Corral M, Doallo S (2014) Impact of alcohol use on inhibitory control (and vice versa) during adolescence and young adulthood : a review. Alcohol Alcohol 49(2):173–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agt168
Maurage P, Lannoy S, Mange J, Grynberg D, Beaunieux H, Banovic I, Gierski F, Naassila M (2020) What we talk about when we talk about binge drinking: towards an integrated conceptualization and evaluation. Alcohol Alcohol 55(5):468–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaa041
McAteer, Curran D, Hanna D (2015) Alcohol attention bias in adolescent social drinkers: an eye tracking study. Psychopharmacology, 232(17), 3183‑3191https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-3969-z
McAteer, Hanna D, Curran D (2018) Age-related differences in alcohol attention bias: a cross-sectional study. Psychopharmacology, 235(8), 2387‑2393 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-4935-3
Monem RG, Fillmore MT (2017) Measuring heightened attention to alcohol in a naturalistic setting: a validation study. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 25(6):496–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000157
Müller-Oehring EM, Le Berre A-P, Serventi M, Kalon E, Haas AL, Padula CB, Schulte T (2019) Brain activation to cannabis- and alcohol-related words in alcohol use disorder. Psych Res. Neuroimaging 294:111005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.111005
Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat vis 10(4):437–442. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00366
Petit G, Kornreich C, Noël X, Verbanck P, Campanella S (2012) Alcohol-related context modulates performance of social drinkers in a visual go/no-go task: a preliminary assessment of event-related potentials. PLoS ONE 7(5):e37466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037466
Popa L, Selejan O, Scott A, Mureşanu DF, Balea M, Rafila A (2015) Reading beyond the glance: eye tracking in neurosciences. Neurol Sci 36(5):683–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2076-6
Ryerson NC, Neal LB, Gable PA (2017) Attenuating the alcohol allure: attentional broadening reduces rapid motivational response to alcohol pictures. Psychopharmacology 234(8):1247–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4557-1
Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18(3):247–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, De La Fuente JR, Grant M (1993) Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction 88(6):791–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x
Sharbanee JM, Stritzke WGK, Wiers RW, MacLeod C (2013) Alcohol-related biases in selective attention and action tendency make distinct contributions to dysregulated drinking behaviour: alcohol-biases in selective attention and action tendency. Addiction 108(10):1758–1766. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12256
Theeuwes J, Van der Stigchel S (2006) Faces capture attention: evidence from inhibition of return. Vis Cogn 13(6):657–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500410949
Tibboel H, De Houwer J, Field M (2010) Reduced attentional blink for alcohol-related stimuli in heavy social drinkers. J Psychopharmacol 24(9):1349–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881109106977
Townshend JM, Duka T (2002) Patterns of alcohol drinking in a population of young social drinkers: a comparison of questionnaire and diary measures. Alcohol Alcohol 37:187–192
Townshend JM, Duka T (2005) Binge drinking, cognitive performance and mood in a population of young social drinkers. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res, 29(3), 317‑325. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ALC.0000156453.05028.F5
Townshend JM, Duka T (2007) Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli in alcohol-dependent inpatients. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res, 31(8), 1349‑1357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00429.x
Wiers CE, Gladwin TE, Ludwig VU, Gröpper S, Stuke H, Gawron CK, Wiers RW, Walter H, Bermpohl F (2016) Comparing three cognitive biases for alcohol cues in alcohol dependence. Alcohol and Alcoholismhttps://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agw063
Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RCME, Sher KJ, Grenard J, Ames SL, Stacy AW (2007) Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86(2):263–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2006.09.021
Acknowledgements
We thank Alexia Havelange for her help in data acquisition.
Funding
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique—FNRS, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, ANR-15-IDEX-02. Pierre Maurage (Senior Research Associate) and Zoé Bollen (Junior Research Associate) are supported by the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S.-FNRS). This work has been supported by CerCoG IDEX of the University of Grenoble Alpes in the framework of the “Investissements d’avenir” program of the French National Research Agency (grant number ANR-15-IDEX-02).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bollen, Z., Kauffmann, L., Guyader, N. et al. Does alcohol automatically capture drinkers’ attention? Exploration through an eye-tracking saccadic choice task. Psychopharmacology 240, 271–282 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06314-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06314-w