Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of kappa opioid receptor agonists on fentanyl vs. food choice in male and female rats: contingent vs. non-contingent administration

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Strategies are needed to decrease the abuse liability of mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists. One strategy under consideration is to combine MOR agonists with kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists.

Objectives

The effects of KOR agonists (U50488, nalfurafine) on fentanyl-vs.-food choice were compared under conditions where the KOR agonists were added to the intravenously self-administered fentanyl (contingent delivery) or administered as subcutaneous pretreatments (non-contingent delivery) in male and female rats.

Methods

Rats were trained to respond under a concurrent schedule of fentanyl (0, 0.32–10 μg/kg/infusion) and food reinforcement. In experiment 1, U50488 and nalfurafine were co-administered with fentanyl as fixed-proportion mixtures (contingent administration). In experiment 2, U50488 (1–10 mg/kg) and nalfurafine (3.2–32 μg/kg) were administered as acute pretreatments (non-contingent administration). The selective KOR antagonist, nor-BNI (32 mg/kg), was administered prior to contingent and non-contingent KOR-agonist treatment in experiment 3.

Results

Both U50488 and nalfurafine decreased fentanyl choice when administered contingently, demonstrating that KOR agonists punish opioid choice. However, evidence for punishment corresponded with an elimination of operant responding in the majority of rats. Non-contingent U50488 and nalfurafine administration only decreased the number of choices made during the behavioral session without altering fentanyl choice. Contingent and non-contingent KOR-agonist effects on fentanyl choice were both attenuated by nor-BNI.

Conclusions

These results illustrate that the effects of KOR agonists on fentanyl reinforcement are dependent upon the contingencies under which they are administered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The manuscript content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The author would like to thank Dr. Matthew L. Banks, Dr. Kevin B. Freeman, and Mr. C. Austin Zamarripa for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by (1) a Research Grant awarded by the Virginia Commonwealth University Postdoctoral Association, (2) the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers F32DA047026 and P30DA033934, and (3) the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and the National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Programs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Andrew Townsend.

Ethics declarations

The manuscript content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(PDF 352 kb)

ESM 2

(JPG 2464 kb)

ESM 3

(JPG 2453 kb)

ESM 4

(JPG 2806 kb)

ESM 5

(JPG 2776 kb)

ESM 6

(JPG 2684 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Townsend, E.A. Effects of kappa opioid receptor agonists on fentanyl vs. food choice in male and female rats: contingent vs. non-contingent administration. Psychopharmacology 238, 1017–1028 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05749-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05749-9

Keywords

Navigation