Skip to main content
Log in

Differential rearing alters taste reactivity to ethanol, sucrose, and quinine

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Early-life environment influences reinforcer and drug motivation in adulthood; however, the impact on specific components of motivation, including hedonic value (“liking”), remains unknown.

Objectives

The current study determined whether differential rearing alters liking and aversive responding to ethanol, sucrose, and quinine in an ethanol-naïve rat model.

Methods

Male and female rats were reared for 30 days starting at postnatal day 21 in either an enriched (EC), isolated (IC), or standard condition (SC). Thereafter, all rats had indwelling intraoral fistulae implanted and their taste reactivity to water, ethanol (5, 10, 20, 30, 40% v/v), sucrose (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 M), and quinine (0.1, 0.5 mM) was recorded and analyzed.

Results

EC rats had higher amounts of liking responses to ethanol, sucrose, and quinine and higher amounts of aversive responses to ethanol and quinine compared to IC rats. While EC and IC rats’ responses were different from each other, they both tended to be similar to SCs, who fell in between the EC and IC groups.

Conclusions

These results suggest that environmental enrichment may enhance sensitivity to a variety of tastants, thereby enhancing liking, while isolation may dull sensitivity, thereby dulling liking. Altogether, the evidence suggests that isolated rats have a shift in the allostatic set-point which may, in part, drive increased responding for a variety of rewards including ethanol and sucrose. Enriched rats have enhanced liking of both sucrose and ethanol suggesting that enrichment may offer a unique phenotype with divergent preferences for incentive motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication was supported by Kansas State University and the Cognitive and Neurobiological Approaches to Plasticity (CNAP) Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20GM113109. Special thanks to Tucker Allen, Mykenzi Allison, Megan Bloedel, R. Maxwell Campbell, Chase Cunningham, Joanne Gomendoza, Bree Humburg, Lily Marshall, Jared Rack, P. Mateo Small, Riley Stearns, and Shea Taylor for all their help with running and scoring taste reactivity for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Wukitsch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

TJW, ECB, TJM, SWK, and MEC declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wukitsch, T.J., Brase, E.C., Moser, T.J. et al. Differential rearing alters taste reactivity to ethanol, sucrose, and quinine. Psychopharmacology 237, 583–597 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05394-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05394-x

Keywords

Navigation