Psychedelics and connectedness

Abstract

Psychedelic drugs are creating ripples in psychiatry as evidence accumulates of their therapeutic potential. An important question remains unresolved however: how are psychedelics effective? We propose that a sense of connectedness is key, provide some preliminary evidence to support this, and suggest a roadmap for testing it further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Barrett FS, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR (2015) Validation of the revised mystical experience questionnaire in experimental sessions with psilocybin. J Psychopharmacol 29:1182–1190

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Belser AB, Agin-Liebes G, Swift CT, Terrana S, Devenot N, Friedman LH, Guss J, Bossis A, Ross S (2017) Patient experiences of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Humanist Psychol 57(4):354–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carhart-Harris RL, Goodwin GM (2017) The therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs: past, present and future. Neuropsychopharmacology. doi:10.1038/npp.2017.84

  4. Carhart-Harris RL, Nutt DJ (2017) Serotonin and brain function: a tale of two receptors. J Psychopharmacol (in press)

  5. Carhart-Harris RL, Leech R, Hellyer PJ et al (2014) The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs. Front Hum Neurosci 8:20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Rucker J et al (2016) Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry 3:619–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrillo FSDF, Sigman M, Ashton P, Fitzgerald L, Stroud J, Carhart-Harris RL (2017) Natural speech predicts therapeutic effectiveness of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. J Affect Disord (in press)

  8. Cervinka R, Roderer K, Hefler E (2012) Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. J Health Psychol 17:379–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Forstmann M, Sagioglou C (2017) Lifetime experience with (classic) psychedelics predicts pro-environmental behavior through an increase in nature relatedness. J Psychopharmacol 31(8):975–988

  10. Griffiths RR, Richards WA, McCann U et al (2006) Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology 187:268–283 discussion 284-292

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karp DA (2017) Speaking of sadness: depression, disconnection, and the meanings of illness, Oxford. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C et al (2011) Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry 199:445–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee RM, Robbins SB (1995) Measuring belongingness—the social connectedness and the social assurance scales. J Couns Psychol 42:232–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee RM, Dean BL, Jung KR (2008) Social connectedness, extraversion, and subjective well-being: testing a mediation model. Personal Individ Differ 45:414–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayer FS, Frantz CM (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol 24:503–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nour MM, Evans L, Nutt D et al (2016) Ego-dissolution and psychedelics: validation of the ego-dissolution inventory (EDI). Front Hum Neurosci. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00269

  17. Nour MM, Evans L and Carhart-Harris RL. (2017) Psychedelics, personality and political perspectives. J Psychoactive Drugs: 1–10

  18. Piff PK, Dietze P, Feinberg M et al (2015) Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 108:883–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Poldrack RA (2006) Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends Cogn Sci 10:59–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Racine E, Waldman S, Rosenberg J et al (2010) Contemporary neuroscience in the media. Soc Sci Med 71:725–733

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Richards WA (2015) Sacred knowledge: psychedelics and religious experiences. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tagliazucchi E, Roseman L, Kaelen M et al (2016) Increased global functional connectivity correlates with LSD-induced ego dissolution. Curr Biol 26:1043–1050

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R et al (2007) The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Watts RDC, Krzanowski J, Nutt DJ, Carhart-Harris RL (2017) Patients’ accounts of increased ‘connection’ and ‘acceptance’ after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. J Humanist Psychol. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00269

  25. Wayment HA, Bauer JJ, Sylaska K, et al. (2015) The quiet ego scale: measuring the compassionate self-identity. J Happiness Stud. 16pp

  26. White F (1987) The overview effect: space exploration and human evolution. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

RLC-H is supported by the Alex Mosley Charitable Trust. RW is supported by Compass Pathways.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RW conceived of the notion and importance of connectedness through her follow-up to our recent psilocybin for TRD trial. RCH wrote this paper with feedback from RW, DE and MK. MK and EH provided the data for Fig. 1, and EH made the figure. DE provided intellectual input regarding the central construct plus editorial advice. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Watts.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carhart-Harris, R.L., Erritzoe, D., Haijen, E. et al. Psychedelics and connectedness. Psychopharmacology 235, 547–550 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4701-y

Download citation