Abstract
Rationale
The 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) is widely used to measure rodent attentional functions. In humans, many attention studies in healthy and clinical populations have used testing based on Bundesen’s Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) to estimate visual processing speeds and other parameters of attentional capacity.
Objectives
We aimed to bridge these research fields by modifying the 5-CSRTT’s design and by mathematically modelling data to derive attentional parameters analogous to human TVA-based measures.
Methods
C57BL/6 mice were tested in two 1-h sessions on consecutive days with a version of the 5-CSRTT where stimulus duration (SD) probe length was varied based on information from previous TVA studies. Thereafter, a scopolamine hydrobromide (HBr; 0.125 or 0.25 mg/kg) pharmacological challenge was undertaken, using a Latin square design. Mean score values were modelled using a new three-parameter version of TVA to obtain estimates of visual processing speeds, visual thresholds and motor response baselines in each mouse.
Results
The parameter estimates for each animal were reliable across sessions, showing that the data were stable enough to support analysis on an individual level. Scopolamine HBr dose-dependently reduced 5-CSRTT attentional performance while also increasing reward collection latency at the highest dose. Upon TVA modelling, scopolamine HBr significantly reduced visual processing speed at both doses, while having less pronounced effects on visual thresholds and motor response baselines.
Conclusions
This study shows for the first time how 5-CSRTT performance in mice can be mathematically modelled to yield estimates of attentional capacity that are directly comparable to estimates from human studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 5-CSRTT:
-
5-choice serial reaction time task
- ADHD:
-
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
- CPT:
-
Continuous performance test
- ITI:
-
Inter-trial interval
- SD:
-
Stimulus duration
- TVA:
-
Theory of Visual Attention
References
Amitai N, Markou A (2010) Disruption of performance in the five-choice serial reaction time task induced by administration of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists: relevance to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 68(1):5–16. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.004
Bari A, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2008) The application of the 5-choice serial reaction time task for the assessment of visual attentional processes and impulse control in rats. Nat Protoc 3(5):759–767. doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.41
Bartko SJ et al (2011) Intact attentional processing but abnormal responding in M1 muscarinic receptor-deficient mice using an automated touchscreen method. Neuropharmacology 61(8):1366–1378. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181a15ae8.Screening
Bate ST, Clark RA (2014) The design and statistical analysis of animal experiments. Cambridge University, Cambridge
Bate ST, Clark RA (2015) invivostat.co.uk. 3.4 ed. Accessed 17 August 2015
Bernstein JG, Boyden ES (2011) Optogenetic tools for analyzing the neural circuits of behavior. Trends Cogn Sci 15(12):592–600. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.003
Bitanihirwe BKY, Dubroqua S, Singer P et al (2011) Sensorimotor gating and vigilance-dependent choice accuracy: a within-subject correlative analysis in wild-type C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res 217:178–187. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.10.021
de Bruin NMWJ, Fransen F, Duytschaever H et al (2006) Attentional performance of (C57BL/6J x 129Sv)F2 mice in the five-choice serial reaction time task. Physiol Behav 89(5):692–703. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.009
Bublak P, Redel P, Sorg C et al (2011) Staged decline of visual processing capacity in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 32(7):1219–1230. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.07.012
Bublak P, Redel P, Finke K (2006) Spatial and non-spatial attention deficits in neurodegenerative diseases: assessment based on Bundesen’s Theory of Visual Attention (TVA). Restor Neurol Neurosci 24:287–301
Bundesen C (1990) A theory of visual attention. Psychol Rev 97(4):523–547
Bundesen C, Habekost T, Kyllingsbæk S (2005) A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychol Rev 112(2):291–328
Carli M, Robbins TW, Evenden JL, Everitt BJ et al (1983) Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats; implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal. Behav Brain Res 9(3):361–380
Carruthers SP, Gurvich CT, Rossell SL (2015) The muscarinic system, cognition and schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 55:393–402. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.011
Deiana S, Platt B, Riedel G (2011) The cholinergic system and spatial learning. Behav Brain Res 221(2):389–411. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.036
Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience 18:193–222
Duka T, Ott H, Rohloff A, Voet B (1996) The effects of a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist beta-carboline ZK-93426 on scopolamine-induced impairment on attention, memory and psychomotor skills. Psychopharmacology 123(4):361–373
Duncan J, Bundesen C, Olson A et al (1999) Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. J Exp Psychol Gen 128(4):450–478
Erskine FF, Ellis JR, Ellis KA et al (2004) Evidence for synergistic modulation of early information processing by nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in humans. Human Psychopharmacology 19(7):503–509. doi:10.1002/hup.613
Finke K, Dodds CM, Bublak P et al (2010) Effects of modafinil and methylphenidate on visual attention capacity: a tva-based study. Psychopharmacology 210(3):317–329. doi:10.1007/s00213-010-1823-x
Fisher A (2012) Cholinergic modulation of amyloid precursor protein processing with emphasis on M1 muscarinic receptor: perspectives and challenges in treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 120(SUPPL. 1):22–33. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07507.x
National Institutes of Health (1985) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. NIH Publication No. 85–23
Habekost T, Starrfelt R (2009) Visual attention capacity: a review of TVA-based patient studies: cognition and neurosciences. Scand J Psychol 50(1):23–32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00681.x
Habekost T, Petersen A, Vangkilde S (2014) Testing attention: comparing the ANT with TVA-based assessment. Behav Res Methods 46(1):81–94. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0341-2
Habekost T (2015) Clinical TVA-based studies: a general review. Front Psychol 6:290. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00290
Humby T, Laird FM, Davies W, Wilkinson LS (1999) Visuospatial attentional functioning in mice: interactions between cholinergic manipulations and genotype. Eur J Neurosci 11(8):2813–2823. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00701.x
Kim CH, Hvoslef-Eide M, Nilsson SRO et al (2015) The continuous performance test (rCPT) for mice: a novel operant touchscreen test of attentional function. Psychopharmacology 232(21–22):3947–3966. doi:10.1007/s00213-015-4081-0
Koller G, Satzger W, Adam M et al (2003) Effects of scopolamine on matching to sample paradigm and related tests in human subjects. Neuropsychobiology 48(2):87–94. doi:10.1159/000072883
Lustig C, Kozak R, Sarter M et al (2013) CNTRICS final animal model task selection: control of attention. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37(9):2099–2110. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.05.009
Marrocco R, Witte E, Davidson M (1994) Arousal systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4(2):166–170
Oliver YP, Ripley TL, Stephens DN (2009) Ethanol effects on impulsivity in two mouse strains: similarities to diazepam and ketamine. Psychopharmacology 204(4):679–692. doi:10.1007/s00213-009-1500-0
Patat A, Klein MJ, Surjus A et al (1991) RU 41 656 does not reverse the scopolamine-induced cognitive deficit in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 41(3):225–231. doi:10.1007/BF00315434
Pavía J, de Ceballos ML, Sanchez de la Cuesta F (1998) Alzheimer’s disease: relationship between muscarinic cholinergic receptors, beta-amyloid and tau proteins. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 12(5):473–481
Pitt MA, Myung IJ, Zhang S (2002) Method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychol Rev 109:472–491
Rizzo M, Anderson SW, Dawson J et al (2000) Visual attention impairments in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 54(10):1954–1959
Robbins TW (2002) The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry. Psychopharmacology 163:362–380. doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1154-7
Robinson L, Harbaran D, Riedel G (2004) Visual acuity in the water maze: sensitivity to muscarinic receptor blockade in rats and mice. Behav Brain Res 151:277–286
Romberg C, Mattson MP, Mughal MR et al (2011) Impaired attention in the 3xTgAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: rescue by donepezil (Aricept). J Neurosci 31(9):3500–3507. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5242-10.2011
Roth BL (2016) DREADDs for neuroscientists. Neuron 89(4):683–694. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.040
Russell VA (2011) Overview of animal models of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Current Protocols in Neuroscience SUPPL.54:1–25. doi:10.1002/0471142301.ns0935s54
Sanchez-Roige S, Peña-Oliver Y, Stephens DN (2012) Measuring impulsivity in mice: the five-choice serial reaction time task. Psychopharmacology 219(2):253–270. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2560-5
Sanchez-Roige S, Baro V, Trick L et al (2014) Exaggerated waiting impulsivity associated with human binge drinking, and high alcohol consumption in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 39(13):2919–2927. doi:10.1038/npp.2014.151
Sarter M (2004) Animal cognition: defining the issues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28(7):645–650. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.005
Shannon HE, Eberle EL (2006) Effects of biasing the location of stimulus presentation, and the muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist scopolamine, on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction time attention task in rats. Behav Pharmacol 17(1):71–85
Terry AV Jr, Buccafusco JJ (2003) The cholinergic hypothesis of age and Alzheimer ’ s disease- related cognitive Deficits : recent challenges and their implications for novel drug development. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 306(3):821–827. doi:10.1124/jpet.102.041616.For
Thienel R, Kellermann T, Schall U et al (2009) Muscarinic antagonist effects on executive control of attention. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 12(10):1307–1317. doi:10.1017/S146114570999068X
Tünnermann J (2016) On origin of temporal-order perception by means of attentional selection. Doctoral dissertation, Paderborn, Paderborn University
Vangkilde S, Bundesen C, Coull JT (2011) Prompt but inefficient: nicotine differentially modulates discrete components of attention. Psychopharmacology 218(4):667–680. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2361-x
Voon V, Irvine MA, Derbyshire K et al (2014) Measuring “waiting” impulsivity in substance addictions and binge eating disorder in a novel analogue of rodent serial reaction time task. Biol Psychiatry 75(2):148–155. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.013
Wada M, Higo N, Moizumi S, Kitazawa S (2010) C-Fos expression during temporal order judgment in mice. PLoS One 5(5):e10483. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010483
Wada M, Moizumi S, Kitazawa S (2005) Temporal order judgment in mice. Behav Brain Res 157(1):167–175. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2004.06.026
Wickens JR, Hyland BI, Tripp G (2011) Animal models to guide clinical drug development in ADHD: lost in translation? Br J Pharmacol 164(4):1107–1128. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01412.x
Wrenn CC, Turchi JN, Schlosser S et al (2006) Performance of galanin transgenic mice in the 5-choice serial reaction time attentional task. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 83(3):428–440. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2006.03.003
Young JW, Finlayson K, Spratt C et al (2004) Nicotine improves sustained attention in mice: evidence for involvement of the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Neuropsychopharmacology 29(5):891–900. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300393
Young JW, Light GA, Marston HM et al (2009) The 5-choice continuous performance test: evidence for a translational test of vigilance for mice. PLoS One 4(1):e4227. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004227
Young JW, Geyer MA, Rissling AJ et al (2013) Reverse translation of the rodent 5C-CPT reveals that the impaired attention of people with schizophrenia is similar to scopolamine-induced deficits in mice. Transl Psychiatry 3(11):e324. doi:10.1038/tp.2013.82
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the UCPH 2016 Program of Excellence—Attention to Dopamine: From Psychological Functions to Molecular Mechanisms and the Lundbeck Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
C. M. Fitzpatrick and M. Caballero-Puntiverio shared first authors
D. P. D. Woldbye, J. T. Andreasen and A. Petersen shared last authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fitzpatrick, C.M., Caballero-Puntiverio, M., Gether, U. et al. Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) applied to mice in the 5-choice serial reaction time task. Psychopharmacology 234, 845–855 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-016-4520-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-016-4520-6