Cocaine administration dose-dependently increases sexual desire and decreases condom use likelihood: The role of delay and probability discounting in connecting cocaine with HIV
Although cocaine use has been linked to sexual HIV risk behavior for decades, the direct effects of cocaine on sexual desire and sexual decision-making are unexamined. Research suggests delay discounting (devaluation of future outcomes) and probability discounting (devaluation of uncertain outcomes) play roles in condom use decisions. This study examined the effect of cocaine administration on sexual desire, hypothetical condom use, and discounting tasks.
This double-blind, within-subjects study compared the effects of 0, 125, and 250 mg/70 kg oral cocaine HCl in 12 cocaine users. Measures included sexual desire and other subjective ratings, the Sexual Delay Discounting Task, the Sexual Probability Discounting Task, and monetary delay and probability discounting tasks.
Cocaine caused dose-related increases in sexual desire and prototypical stimulant abuse-liability ratings. Relative to placebo, cocaine did not significantly alter condom use likelihood when condoms were immediately available or when sex was associated with 100% certainty of sexually transmitted infection (STI). In contrast, cocaine dose-dependently strengthened the effect of delay (sexual delay discounting) and STI uncertainty (sexual probability discounting) in decreasing condom use likelihood. Cocaine caused no significant change in monetary delay and probability discounting.
This is the first study showing that cocaine administration increases sexual desire. Detrimental effects of cocaine on sexual risk were only observed when safer sex required delay, or STI risk was uncertain (representative of many real-world scenarios), suggesting a critical role of discounting processes. Lack of monetary effects highlights the importance of studying clinically relevant outcomes when examining drug effects on behavioral processes.
KeywordsCocaine Delay discounting HIV Sexual risk behavior Sexual desire Humans
- Ammons RB, Ammons CH (1962) Quick Test (QT): provisional manual. Psychol Rep 11:111–161Google Scholar
- Chan SK, Thornton LR, Chronister KJ, Meyer J, Wolverton M, Johnson CK, Arafat RR, Joyce PM, Switzer WM, Heneine W, Shankar A, Granade T, Owen MS, Sprinkle P, Sullivan V, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2014) Likely female-to-female sexual transmission of HIV—Texas, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 63:209–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
- Colfax G, Vittinghoff E, Husnik MJ, McKirnan D, Buchbinder S, Koblin B, Celum C, Chesney M, Huang Y, Mayer K, Bozeman S, Judson FN, Bryant KJ, Coates TJ, EXPLORE Study Team (2004) Substance use and sexual risk: a participant- and episode-level analysis among a cohort of men who have sex with men. Am J Epidemiol 159:1002–1012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn, KE, Barrett, FS, Herrmann, ES, Plebani, JG, Sigmon, SC, & Johnson, MW (2016) Behavioral Risk Assessment for Infectious Diseases (BRAID): self-report instrument to assess injection and noninjection risk behaviors in substance users. Drug Alcohol DependGoogle Scholar
- Edlin BR, Irwin KL, Faruque S, McCoy CB, Word C, Serrano Y, Inciardi JA, Bowser BP, Schilling RF, Holmberg SD (1994) Intersecting epidemics—crack cocaine use and HIV infection among inner-city young adults. Multicenter Crack Cocaine and HIV Infection Study Team. N Engl J Med 331:1422–1427. doi:10.1056/NEJM199411243312106 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- George WH, Davis KC, Norris J, Heiman JR, Stoner SA, Schacht RL, Hendershot CS, Kajumulo KF (2009) Indirect effects of acute alcohol intoxication on sexual risk-taking: the roles of subjective and physiological sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav 38:498–513. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9346-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoyle RH, Kenny, D (1999) Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation. In: Hoyle RH (ed), Statistical strategies for small sample research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 195–222.Google Scholar
- Kessler RC, Adler L, Ames M, Demler O, Faraone S, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Jin R, Secnik K, Spencer T, Ustun TB, Walters EE (2005) The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychol Med 35:245–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Brien CP (2011) Drug addiction; Goodman & Gilman’s pharmacologic basis for therapeutics. In: Brunton LL, Chabner BA, Knollman BC (eds) Goodman & Gilman’s pharmacologic basis for therapeutics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Rendina HJ, Moody RL, Ventuneac A, Grov C, Parsons JT (2015) Aggregate and event-level associations between substance use and sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men: comparing retrospective and prospective data. Drug Alcohol Depend 154:199–207. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.045 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Semaan S, Des Jarlais DC, Sogolow E, Johnson WD, Hedges LV, Ramirez G, Flores SA, Norman L, Sweat MD, Needle R (2002) A meta-analysis of the effect of HIV prevention interventions on the sex behaviors of drug users in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 30 Suppl 1:S73–S93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sobel BF, Sigmon SC, Griffiths RR (2004) Transdermal nicotine maintenance attenuates the subjective and reinforcing effects of intravenous nicotine, but not cocaine or caffeine, in cigarette-smoking stimulant abusers. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:991–1003. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300415 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar