Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 233, Issue 6, pp 1105–1118 | Cite as

Regulating task-monitoring systems in response to variable reward contingencies and outcomes in cocaine addicts

  • Kristen P. Morie
  • Pierfilippo De Sanctis
  • Hugh Garavan
  • John J. FoxeEmail author
Original Investigation

Abstract

Background

We investigated anticipatory and consummatory reward processing in cocaine addiction. In addition, we set out to assess whether task-monitoring systems were appropriately recalibrated in light of variable reward schedules. We also examined neural measures of task-monitoring and reward processing as a function of hedonic tone, since anhedonia is a vulnerability marker for addiction that is obviously germane in the context of reward processing.

Method

High-density event-related potentials were recorded while participants performed a speeded response task that systematically varied anticipated probabilities of reward receipt. The paradigm dissociated feedback regarding task success (or failure) from feedback regarding the value of reward (or loss), so that task-monitoring and reward processing could be examined in partial isolation. Twenty-three active cocaine abusers and 23 age-matched healthy controls participated.

Results

Cocaine abusers showed amplified anticipatory responses to reward predictive cues, but crucially, these responses were not as strongly modulated by reward probability as in controls. Cocaine users also showed blunted responses to feedback about task success or failure and did not use this information to update predictions about reward. In turn, they showed clearly blunted responses to reward feedback. In controls and users, measures of anhedonia were associated with reward motivation. In cocaine users, anhedonia was also associated with diminished monitoring and reward feedback responses.

Conclusion

Findings imply that reward anticipation and monitoring deficiencies in addiction are associated with increased responsiveness to reward cues but impaired ability to predict reward in light of task contingencies, compounded by deficits in responding to actual reward outcomes.

Keywords

Reward Task monitoring EEG ERP Motivation Substance abuse Addiction Anhedonia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Albert Einstein Division of Substance Abuse, Dr. Julia Arnsten, Dr. Sarah Church, Juan Martinez, Amy Greengrass, Marsha Dommel, and all of the staff at the Next Steps Addiction Treatment Centers in the Bronx for all of their help in recruitment efforts. The work would simply not have been possible without the dedication of these individuals. We would also like to express our sincere gratitude to the participants for giving their time to this effort. Additionally, we thank Dr. Ryan Bell, Ms. Sarah Ruberman, and Mr. Frantzy Acluche for their help during data collection. Participants in this study were recruited and evaluated at The Human Clinical Phenotyping Core, a facility of the Rose F. Kennedy Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC) which is funded through a center grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD P30 HD071593). Dr. Morie is now at the Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Compliance with ethical standards

All participants signed an informed consent document administered by HIPAA-certified staff. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The study conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

213_2015_4191_MOESM1_ESM.docx (40 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 39 kb)

References

  1. Baker TE, Holroyd CB (2011) Dissociated roles of the anterior cingulate cortex in reward and conflict processing as revealed by the feedback error-related negativity and N200. Biol Psychol 87:25–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechara A, Dolan S, Denburg N, Hindes A, Anderson SW, Nathan PE (2001) Decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers. Neuropsychologia 39:376–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechara A, Dolan S, Hindes A (2002) Decision-making and addiction (part II): myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Neuropsychologia 40:1690–1705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell RP, Foxe JJ, Ross LA, Garavan H (2014) Intact inhibitory control processes in abstinent drug abusers (I): a functional neuroimaging study in former cocaine addicts. Neuropharmacology 82:143–150PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Benikos N, Johnstone SJ, Roodenrys SJ (2013) Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components. Int J Psychophysiol 87:262–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter BL, Tiffany ST (1999) Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 94:327–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman LJ, Chapman JP, Raulin ML (1976) Scales for physical and social anhedonia. J Abnorm Psychol 85:374–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chase HW, Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Hogarth L (2011) The neural basis of drug stimulus processing and craving: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Biol Psychiatry 70:785–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorard G, Berthoz S, Phan O, Corcos M, Bungener C (2008) Affect dysregulation in cannabis abusers: a study in adolescents and young adults. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 17:274–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Erlenmeyer-Kimling L, Cornblatt BA, Rock D, Roberts S, Bell M, West A (1993) The New York High-Risk Project: Anhedonia, Attentional Deviance, and Psychopathology. Schizophr Bull 19Google Scholar
  11. Everitt BJ (2014) Neural and psychological mechanisms underlying compulsive drug seeking habits and drug memories—indications for novel treatments of addiction. Eur J Neurosci 40:2163–2182PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fillmore MT, Rush CR (2006) Polydrug abusers display impaired discrimination-reversal learning in a model of behavioural control. J Psychopharmacol 20:24–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Franken IH, Zijlstra C, Muris P (2006) Are nonpharmacological induced rewards related to anhedonia? A study among skydivers. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 30:297–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Franken IH, Rassin E, Muris P (2007a) The assessment of anhedonia in clinical and non-clinical populations: further validation of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). J Affect Disord 99:83–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Franken IH, van Strien JW, Franzek EJ, van de Wetering BJ (2007b) Error-processing deficits in patients with cocaine dependence. Biol Psychol 75:45–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Garavan H, Hester R (2007) The role of cognitive control in cocaine dependence. Neuropsychol Rev 17:337–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Garavan H, Kaufman JN, Hester R (2008) Acute effects of cocaine on the neurobiology of cognitive control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 363:3267–3276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gawin F (1989) Cocaine dependence. Annu Rev Med 40:149–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldstein RZ, Cottone LA, Jia Z, Maloney T, Volkow ND, Squires NK (2006) The effect of graded monetary reward on cognitive event-related potentials and behavior in young healthy adults. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 62:272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldstein RZ, Parvaz MA, Maloney T, Alia-Klein N, Woicik PA, Telang F, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2008) Compromised sensitivity to monetary reward in current cocaine users: an ERP study. Psychophysiology 45:705–713PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldstein RZ, Alia-Klein N, Tomasi D, Carrillo JH, Maloney T, Woicik PA, Wang R, Telang F, Volkow ND (2009) Anterior cingulate cortex hypoactivations to an emotionally salient task in cocaine addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:9453–9458PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Harvey PO, Pruessner J, Czechowska Y, Lepage M (2007) Individual differences in trait anhedonia: a structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging study in non-clinical subjects. Mol Psychiatry 12(703):767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hewig J, Kretschmer N, Trippe RH, Hecht H, Coles MG, Holroyd CB, Miltner WH (2010) Hypersensitivity to reward in problem gamblers. Biol Psychiatry 67:781–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Janiri L, Martinotti G, Dario T, Reina D, Paparello F, Pozzi G, Addolorato G, Di Giannantonio M, De Risio S (2005) Anhedonia and substance-related symptoms in detoxified substance-dependent subjects: a correlation study. Neuropsychobiology 52:37–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jentsch JD, Olausson P, De La Garza R 2nd, Taylor JR (2002) Impairments of reversal learning and response perseveration after repeated, intermittent cocaine administrations to monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacology Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacology 26:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jia Z, Worhunsky PD, Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ, Stevens MC, Pearlson GD, Potenza MN (2011) An initial study of neural responses to monetary incentives as related to treatment outcome in cocaine dependence. Biol Psychiatry 70:553–560PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kampman KM, Volpicelli JR, McGinnis DE, Alterman AI, Weinrieb RM, D’Angelo L, Epperson LE (1998) Reliability and validity of the Cocaine Selective Severity Assessment. Addict Behav 23:449–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhn S, Gallinat J (2011) Common biology of craving across legal and illegal drugs—a quantitative meta-analysis of cue-reactivity brain response. Eur J Neurosci 33:1318–1326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Leynes PA, Allen JD, Marsh RL (1998) Topographic differences in CNV amplitude reflect different preparatory processes. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 31:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li CS, Milivojevic V, Kemp K, Hong K, Sinha R (2006) Performance monitoring and stop signal inhibition in abstinent patients with cocaine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 85:205–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, Griffith J, Evans F, Barr HL, O’Brien CP (1985) New data from the Addiction Severity Index: reliability and validity in three centers. J Nerv Ment Dis 3:412–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morie KP, De Sanctis P, Garavan H, Foxe JJ (2014a) Executive Dysfunction and Reward Dysregulation: A High-Density Electrical Mapping Study in Cocaine Abusers. Neuropharmacology 85Google Scholar
  33. Morie KP, Garavan H, Bell RP, De Sanctis P, Krakowski MI, Foxe JJ (2014b) Intact inhibitory control processes in abstinent drug abusers (II): a high-density electrical mapping study in former cocaine and heroin addicts. Neuropharmacology 82:151–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Morie KP, Sanctis PD, Foxe JJ (2014c) Reward Contingencies and the Recalibration of Task Monitoring and Reward Systems: A high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroscienceGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson A, Killcross S (2006) Amphetamine exposure enhances habit formation. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 26:3805–3812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Padrao G, Mallorqui A, Cucurell D, Marco-Pallares J, Rodriguez-Fornells A (2012) Neurophysiological differences in reward processing in anhedonics. Cogn Affect Behav NeurosciGoogle Scholar
  37. Parvaz MA, Maloney T, Moeller SJ, Woicik PA, Alia-Klein N, Telang F, Wang GJ, Squires NK, Volkow ND, Goldstein RZ (2012) Sensitivity to monetary reward is most severely compromised in recently abstaining cocaine addicted individuals: a cross-sectional ERP study. Psychiatry Res 203:75–82PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Polich J, Kok A (1995) Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review. Biol Psychol 41:103–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2001) Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 96:103–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sato A, Yasuda A, Ohira H, Miyawaki K, Nishikawa M, Kumano H, Kuboki T (2005) Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300. Neuroreport 16:407–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schoenbaum G, Saddoris MP, Ramus SJ, Shaham Y, Setlow B (2004) Cocaine-experienced rats exhibit learning deficits in a task sensitive to orbitofrontal cortex lesions. Eur J Neurosci 19:1997–2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Simon SL, Richardson K, Dacey J, Glynn S, Domier CP, Rawson RA, Ling W (2002) A comparison of patterns of methamphetamine and cocaine use. J Addict Dis 21:35–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sokhadze E, Stewart C, Hollifield M, Tasman A (2008) Event-related potential study of executive dysfunctions in a speeded reaction task in cocaine addiction. J Neurother 12:185–204PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sturmer B, Nigbur R, Schacht A, Sommer W (2011) Reward and punishment effects on error processing and conflict control. Front Psychol 2:335PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang J, Chen J, Lei Y, Li P (2014) P300, not feedback error-related negativity, manifests the waiting cost of receiving reward information. Neuroreport 25:1044–1048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu Y, Zhou XL (2009) The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation. Brain Res 1286:114–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yeung N, Sanfey AG (2004) Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 24:6258–6264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yu R, Zhou W, Zhou X (2011) Rapid processing of both reward probability and reward uncertainty in the human anterior cingulate cortex. PLoS One 6:e29633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029633 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristen P. Morie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pierfilippo De Sanctis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hugh Garavan
    • 3
  • John J. Foxe
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.The Sheryl and Daniel R. Tishman Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Evaluation and Rehabilitation Center (CERC)Albert Einstein College of Medicine & Montefiore Medical CenterBronxUSA
  2. 2.Program in Cognitive NeuroscienceThe Graduate Center of the City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  4. 4.The Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Rose F. Kennedy Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUSA
  5. 5.The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuromedicine, Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations