Male, But Not Female, Alcohol-Dependent African Americans Discount Delayed Gains More Steeply than Propensity-Score Matched Controls
- 234 Downloads
Alcohol dependence is known to be associated with steep discounting of delayed rewards, but its relation to the discounting of delayed losses and probabilistic rewards is unclear. Moreover, patterns of alcohol consumption vary considerably between communities, but previous research has not examined the relation between discounting and alcohol dependence in low-income African Americans.
The goal of the present study was to determine whether low-income, alcohol-dependent African Americans differ from controls in the degree to which they discount delayed rewards, delayed losses, or probabilistic rewards.
African–American participants, both cases and controls, were recruited from the same low-income neighborhoods, and propensity-score matching was used to further control for demographic differences. Participants performed three tasks that assessed their discounting of hypothetical monetary outcomes: delayed rewards, delayed losses, and probabilistic rewards.
Alcohol-dependent cases discounted delayed gains, but not delayed losses or probabilistic gains, more steeply than their matched controls. The difference in discounting of delayed gains was localized to the male cases, whose discounting was steeper than either the male controls or the female cases; no gender difference was observed between male and female controls.
The present results extend findings regarding discounting by substance abusers to a previously unstudied group, low-income African Americans, and suggest that in this group at least, alcohol dependence, particularly in males, may be more a reflection of choosing immediate rewards than of ignoring their delayed negative consequences.
KeywordsAlcohol dependence African Americans Discounting Delayed gains Delayed losses Probabilistic gains Gender Income
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial relationship or conflict of interest to declare.
Funding for the research was provided by NIH grants R01AA017444, T32DA007313 and DA031288.
- Becker SO, Ichino A (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata J 2:358–377Google Scholar
- Du W, Green L, Myerson J (2002) Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychol Rec 52:479–492Google Scholar
- Ford BC, Bullard KM, Taylor RJ, Toler AK, Neighbors HW, Jackson JS (2007) Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition disorders among older African Americans: findings from the National Survey of American Life. Am J Geriatr Psychiatr 15:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand Stat Theory Appl 6:65–70Google Scholar
- Murphy JG, Vuchinich RE, Simpson CA (2011) Delayed reward and cost discounting. Psychol Rec 51:571–578Google Scholar
- Takahashi T, Ohmura Y, Oono H, Radford M (2009) Alcohol use and discounting of delayed and probabilistic gain and loss. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 30:479Google Scholar
- Yi R, Mitchell SH, Bickel WK (2010) Delay discounting and substance abuse-dependence. In: Madden GJ, Bickel WK (eds) Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar