Inactivation of the prelimbic or infralimbic cortex impairs decision-making in the rat gambling task
- 1k Downloads
Studies employing the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) demonstrated that areas of the frontal cortex, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), are involved in the decision-making process. However, the precise role of these regions in maintaining optimal choice is not clear.
We used the rat gambling task (rGT), a rodent analogue of the IGT, to determine whether inactivation of or altered dopamine signalling within discrete cortical sub-regions disrupts decision-making.
Following training on the rGT, animals were implanted with guide cannulae aimed at the prelimbic (PrL) or infralimbic (IL) cortices, the OFC, or the ACC. Prior to testing, rats received an infusion of saline or a combination of baclofen and muscimol (0.125 μg of each/side) to inactivate the region and an infusion of a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (0, 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 μg/side).
Rats tended to increase their choice of a disadvantageous option and decrease their choice of the optimal option following inactivation of either the IL or PrL cortex. In contrast, OFC or ACC inactivation did not affect decision-making. Infusion of a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist into any sub-region did not alter choice preference.
Online activity of the IL or PrL cortex is important for maintaining an optimal decision-making strategy, but optimal performance on the rGT does not require frontal cortex dopamine D2 receptor activation. Additionally, these results demonstrate that the roles of different cortical regions in cost-benefit decision-making may be dissociated using the rGT.
KeywordsAnterior cingulate cortex Decision-making Dopamine receptor Infralimbic cortex Orbitofrontal cortex Prelimbic cortex Rat gambling task Reward Punishment Probability
This work was supported by an operating grant awarded to CAW from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) and by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant R01 DA022628 (LJMJV). CAW also receives salary support through the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and the CIHR New Investigator Award program. FDZ currently receives salary support through the CIHR Postdoctoral Fellowship. We thank Suzanne Lemstra and Ruth Damsteegt for practical assistance. CAW has previously consulted for Shire, and FDZ has previously consulted for Intervivo Solutions, Inc, both on unrelated matters. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Chudasama Y, Passetti F, Rhodes SE, Lopian D, Desai A, Robbins TW (2003) Dissociable aspects of performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time task following lesions of the dorsal anterior cingulate, infralimbic and orbitofrontal cortex in the rat: differential effects on selectivity, impulsivity and compulsivity. Behav Brain Res 146(1–2):105–19Google Scholar
- Connolly NP, Kim JS, Tunstall BJ, Kearns DN (2015) A test of stress, cues, and re-exposure to large wins as potential reinstaters of suboptimal decision making in rats. Front Psychol 6:394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00394
- Eagle DM, Baunez C, Hutcheson DM, Lehmann O, Shah AP, Robbins TW (2008) Stop-signal reaction-time task performance: role of prefrontal cortex and subthalamic nucleus. Cereb Cortex 18(1):178–188Google Scholar
- Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, van den Brink W (2005) Decision making in pathological gambling: a comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 23:137–151. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDonald J (2009) Handbook of biological statistics, 2nd edn. Sparky House Publishing, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Muir JL, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1996) The cerebral cortex of the rat and visual attentional function: dissociable effects of mediofrontal, cingulate, anterior dorsolateral, and parietal cortex lesions on a fivechoice serial reaction time task. Cerebral Cortex 6(3):470–481Google Scholar
- Murphy ER, Fernando AB, Urcelay GP, Robinson ES, Mar AC, Theobald DE, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2012) Impulsive behaviour induced by both NMDA receptor antagonism and GABAA receptor activation in rat ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 219(2):401–410Google Scholar
- Paxinos G, Watson C (1998) The rat brain in stereotaxic co-ordinates. Academic, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- Rivalan M, Coutureau E, Fitoussi A, Dellu-Hagedorn F (2011) Inter-individual decision-making differences in the effects of cingulate, orbitofrontal, and prelimbic cortex lesions in a rat gambling task. Front Behav Neurosci 5:22. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00022 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsutsui-Kimura I, Yoshida T, Ohmura Y, Izumi T, Yoshioka M (2014) Milnacipran remediates impulsive deficits in rats with lesions of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 8(5). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyu083
- Veeneman MMJ, Broekhoven MH, Damsteegt R, Vanderschuren LJMJ (2012) Distinct contributions of dopamine in the dorsolateral striatum and nucleus accumbens shell to the reinforcing properties of cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:487–498. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.209 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeeb FD, Winstanley CA (2011) Lesions of the basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex differentially affect acquisition and performance of a rodent gambling task. J Neurosci 31(6):2197–2204. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5597-10.2011
- Zeeb FD, Winstanley CA (2013) Functional disconnection of the orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala impairs acquisition of a rat gambling task and disrupts animals’ ability to alter decision-making behavior after reinforcer devaluation. J Neurosci 33:6434–6443. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3971-12.2013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeeb FD, Wong AC, Winstanley CA (2013) Differential effects of environmental enrichment, social-housing, and isolation-rearing on a rat gambling task: dissociations between impulsive action and risky decision-making. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 225:381–395. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2822-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar