Effects of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement on reward responsiveness and opioid cue-reactivity
- 1.5k Downloads
Dysregulated reward processing is a hallmark feature of drug addiction; however, scant research has evaluated restructuring reward processing in the context of addiction treatment.
We examined effects of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) on reward responsiveness (RR) and opioid cue-reactivity in a sample of chronic pain patients with opioid use problems. We previously reported that MORE decreased pain, opioid misuse, and craving relative to a social support control group (SG). Here, we examined whether these outcomes were linked to changes in RR in a subset of participants.
Participants were chronic pain patients (71 % women, age 46.6 ± 13.9) who received MORE (n = 20) or SG (n = 29). RR was measured before and after 8 weeks of treatment via heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) responses during a dot probe task that included opioid-related, pain-related, and natural reward stimuli, as well as craving ratings.
The MORE group, who reported decreased opioid misuse and opioid craving during treatment, evidenced less subjective opioid cue-reactivity, greater HR decelerations, and greater increases in HRV to all cues after treatment compared to the SG; HR and HRV effects were most pronounced for natural reward cues. Within the MORE group, HR deceleration to natural reward cues was correlated with increased subjective arousal to the cues, whereas HR deceleration to opioid cues was correlated with decreased subjective arousal. Effects of MORE on craving were mediated by enhanced RR.
Results suggest that during treatment with MORE, cardiac-autonomic responsiveness to non-drug reward increases, while reactivity to opioid reward decreases. Studies are needed to discern whether changes in RR were a result or a determinant of reductions in opioid misuse and craving. RR may play a role in addiction treatment.
KeywordsMindfulness Chronic pain Opioid misuse Addiction Reward Heart rate variability Attentional bias Positive affect Allostasis Cue-reactivity
This work was supported by grant numbers DA032517 and DA037005 from the National Institutes of Health awarded to E.L.G. and a grant from the Fahs Beck Fund for Research and Experimentation, also awarded to E.L.G.
Conflict of interest
- Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions 154:136–136Google Scholar
- Carmines EG, McIver JP (1981) Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures. Social measurement, Current issues:65–115Google Scholar
- Cleeland CS (1994) Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). Houston, TXGoogle Scholar
- Davidson L, White W (2007) The concept of recovery as an organizing principle for integrating mental health and addiction services. J Beh Health Services 34:1094–3412Google Scholar
- Garland EL (2013) Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement for addiction, stress, and pain. NASW Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Garland EL, Fredrickson BL, Kring AM, Johnson DP, Meyer PS, Penn DL (2010a) Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clin Psychol Rev 30:849–864PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garland EL, Froeliger B, Passik S, Howard M (2012b) Attentional bias for prescription opioid cues among opioid dependent chronic pain patients. J Behav Med doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9455-8Google Scholar
- Garland EL, Manusov EG, Froeliger B, Kelly A, Williams J, Howard MO (2014) Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement for chronic pain and prescription opioid misuse: results from an early stage randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol.Google Scholar
- Heinz A, Siessmeier T, Wrase J, Hermann D, Klein S, Grusser SM, Flor H, Braus DF, Buchholz HG, Grunder G, Schreckenberger M, Smolka MN, Rosch F, Mann K, Bartenstein P (2004) Correlation between dopamine D(2) receptors in the ventral striatum and central processing of alcohol cues and craving. Am J Psychiatry 161:1783–1789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kline RB (1998) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (1997a) International affective picture system (IAPS): technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention. Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
- Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (1997b) Motivated attention: affect, activation, and action. In: Lang PJ, Simons RF, Balaban MT (eds) Attention and orienting: sensory and motivational processes. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, pp 97–135Google Scholar
- Lee B, London ED, Poldrack RA, Farahi J, Nacca A, Monterosso JR, Mumford JA, Bokarius AV, Dahlbom M, Mukherjee J (2009) Striatal dopamine d2/d3 receptor availability is reduced in methamphetamine dependence and is linked to impulsivity. J Neurosci 29:14734–14740PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rawson R, McCann MJ (2006) Counselor’s treatment manual: matrix intensive outpatient treatment for people with stimulant use disorders. DHHS Publication No. (SMA)Google Scholar
- Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC (1998) The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 59(Suppl 20):22–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shizgal P, Hyman SP (2013) Motivational and addictive states. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, Siegelbaum S, Hudspeth J (eds) Principles of neural science, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Udo T, Weinberger AH, Grilo CM, Brownell KD, DiLeone RJ, Lampert R, Matlin SL, Yanagisawa K, McKee SA (2013) Heightened vagal activity during high-calorie food presentation in obese compared with non-obese individuals—results of a pilot study. Obes Res Clin Practice. doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2013.05.006Google Scholar