Serotoninergic effects on judgments and social learning of trustworthiness
- 536 Downloads
Certain disorders, such as depression and anxiety, to which serotonin dysfunction is historically associated, are also associated with lower assessments of other people's trustworthiness. Serotonergic changes are known to alter cognitive responses to threatening stimuli. This effect may manifest socially as reduced apparent trustworthiness of others. Trustworthiness judgments can emerge from either direct observation or references provided by third parties.
We assessed whether explicit judgments of trustworthiness and social influences on those judgments are altered by changes within serotonergic systems.
We implemented a double-blind between-subject design where 20 healthy female volunteers received a single dose of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram (2 × 20 mg), while 20 control subjects (matched on age, intelligence, and years of education) received a placebo. Subjects performed a face-rating task assessing how trustworthy they found 153 unfamiliar others (targets). After each rating, the subjects were told how other subjects, on average, rated the same target. The subjects then performed 30 min of distractor tasks before, unexpectedly, being asked to rate all 153 faces again, in a random order.
Compared to subjects receiving a placebo, subjects receiving citalopram rated targets as less trustworthy. They also conformed more to opinions of others, when others rated targets to be even less trustworthy than subjects had initially indicated. The two effects were independent of negative effects of citalopram on subjective state.
This is evidence that serotonin systems can mediate explicit assessment and social learning of the trustworthiness of others.
KeywordsSerotonin SSRI Trustworthiness Social learning Threat processing Mood and anxiety disorders
The project was funded by the Danish Research Foundation, The Lundbeck Foundation and a Sapere Aude young investigator award to DCM by the Danish Council for Independent Research. The experiment complies with the current laws of Denmark. Thanks to Prof. Trevor Robbins for comments on this manuscript. Thanks to Vasily Klucharev for providing the face images used in this task.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
- Field AP (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Forest Laboratories (2009) Celexa. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/020822s037,021046s015lbl.pdf. Accessed May 2009.
- Howell DC (2007) Statistical methods for psychology, 6th edn. Thomson Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
- Lundbeck (2011) Association of CIPRAMIL (citalopram hydrobromide) with dose-dependent QT interval prolongation. Lundbeck Ltd, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
- MHRA (2008) Public assessment report: citalopram 10 mg, citalopram 20 mg, citalopram 40 mg, citalopram hydrobromide PL 20532/0041-3 Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. MHRA, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Papakostas GI, Charles D, Fava M (2010) Are typical starting doses of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors sub-optimal? A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding studies in major depressive disorder. World J Biol Psychiatry 11:300–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar