Skip to main content
Log in

Demand curves for hypothetical cocaine in cocaine-dependent individuals

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Drug purchasing tasks have been successfully used to examine demand for hypothetical consumption of abused drugs including heroin, nicotine, and alcohol. In these tasks, drug users make hypothetical choices whether to buy drugs, and if so, at what quantity, at various potential prices. These tasks allow for behavioral economic assessment of that drug's intensity of demand (preferred level of consumption at extremely low prices) and demand elasticity (sensitivity of consumption to price), among other metrics. However, a purchasing task for cocaine in cocaine-dependent individuals has not been investigated.

Objectives

This study examined a novel Cocaine Purchasing Task and the relation between resulting demand metrics and self-reported cocaine use data.

Methods

Participants completed a questionnaire assessing hypothetical purchases of cocaine units at prices ranging from $0.01 to $1,000. Demand curves were generated from responses on the Cocaine Purchasing Task. Correlations compared metrics from the demand curve to measures of real-world cocaine use.

Results

Group and individual data were well modeled by a demand curve function. The validity of the Cocaine Purchasing Task was supported by a significant correlation between the demand curve metrics of demand intensity and O max (determined from Cocaine Purchasing Task data) and self-reported measures of cocaine use. Partial correlations revealed that after controlling for demand intensity, demand elasticity and the related measure, P max, were significantly correlated with real-world cocaine use.

Conclusions

Results indicate that the Cocaine Purchasing Task produces orderly demand curve data, and that these data relate to real-world measures of cocaine use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammons RB, Ammons CH (1962) The Quick Test (QT): provisional manual. Psychol Rep 11:111–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker F, Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2003) Decision-making in state lotteries: half now or all of it later? Psychon Bull Rev 10(4):965–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Madden GJ (1999) Similar consumption and responding across single and multiple sources of drug. J Exp Anal Behav 72(3):299–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Pitcock JA, Yi R, Angtuaco EJ (2009) Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: fictive and real money gains and losses. J Neurosci 29(27):8839–8846

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galuska CM, Banna KM, Willse LV, Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi N, See RE (2011) A comparison of economic demand and conditioned-cued reinstatement of methamphetamine-seeking or food-seeking in rats. Behav Pharmacol 22(4):312–323

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano LA, Bickel WK, Shahan TA, Badger GJ (2001) Behavioral economics of human drug self-administration: progressive ratio versus random sequences of response requirements. Behav Pharmacol 12(5):343–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinvest NS, Anderson IM (2010) The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 63(6):1072–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudziak JJ, Helzer JE, Wetzel MW, Kessel KB, McGee B, Janca A et al (1993) The use of the DSM-III-R Checklist for initial diagnostic assessments. Compr Psychiatry 34(6):375–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh SR (1980) Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 34(2):219–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh SR (1984) Behavioral economics. J Exp Anal Behav 42(3):435–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh SR, Raslear TG, Shurtleff D, Bauman R, Simmons L (1988) A cost–benefit analysis of demand for food. J Exp Anal Behav 50:419–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh SR, Silberberg A (2008) Economic demand and essential value. Psychol Rev 115(1):186–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh SR, Winger G (1995) Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav 64(3):373–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs EA, Bickel WK (1999) Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 7(4):412–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2002) Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. J Exp Anal Behav 77(2):129–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2003) The behavioral economics of cigarette smoking: The concurrent presence of a substitute and an independent reinforcer. Behav Pharmacol 14(2):137–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2006) Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves. J Exp Anal Behav 85(1):73–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2008) An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-discounting data. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 16(3):264–274

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK, Baker F (2007) Moderate drug use and delay discounting: a comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15(2):187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK, Kirshenbaum AP (2004) Substitutes for tobacco smoking: a behavioral economic analysis of nicotine gum, denicotinized cigarettes, and nicotine-containing cigarettes. Drug Alcohol Depend 74(3):253–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ko MC, Terner J, Hursh S, Woods JH, Winger G (2002) Relative reinforcing effects of three opioids with different durations of action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301(2):698–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawyer SR, Schoepflin F, Green R, Jenks C (2011) Discounting of hypothetical and potentially real outcomes in nicotine-dependent and nondependent samples. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 19(4):263–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lea SE (1978) The psychology and economics of demand. Psychol Bull 85(3):441–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKillop J, Murphy JG (2007) A behavioral economic measure of demand for alcohol predicts brief intervention outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 89(2–3):227–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKillop J, Murphy JG, Ray LA, Eisenberg DTA, Lisman SA, Lum JK et al (2008) Further validation of a cigarette purchase task for assessing the relative reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in college smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 16(1):57–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madden GJ, Begotka AM, Raiff BR, Kastern LL (2003) Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 11(2):139–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madden GJ, Kalman D (2010) Effects of bupropion on simulated demand for cigarettes and the subjective effects of smoking. Nicotine Tob Res 12(4):416–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madden GJ, Raiff BR, Lagorio CH, Begotka AM, Mueller AM, Hehli DJ et al (2004) Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 12(4):251–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattox AJ, Thompson SS, Carroll ME (1997) Smoked heroin and cocaine base (speedball) combinations in rhesus monkeys. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 5(2):113–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClure EA, Vandrey RG, Johnson MW, Stitzer ML (2013) Effects of varenicline on abstinence and smoking reward following a programmed lapse. Nicotine Tob Res 15(1):139–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JG, MacKillop J (2006) Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 14(2):219–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JG, MacKillop J, Skidmore JR, Pederson AA (2009) Reliability and validity of a demand curve measure of alcohol reinforcement. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 17(6):396–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JG, MacKillop J, Tidey JW, Brazil LA, Colby SM (2011) Validity of a demand curve measure of nicotine reinforcement with adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend 113(2–3):207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paloyelis Y, Asherson P, Mehta MA, Faraone SV, Kuntsi J (2010) DAT1 and COMT effects on delay discounting and trait impulsivity in male adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls. Neuropsychopharmacology 35(12):2414–2426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petry NM (2000) Effects of increasing income on polydrug use: a comparison of heroin, cocaine and alcohol abusers. Addiction 95(5):705–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petry NM (2001) A behavioral economic analysis of polydrug abuse in alcoholics: asymmetrical substitution of alcohol and cocaine. Drug Alcohol Depend 62(1):31–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petry NM, Bickel WK (1998) Polydrug abuse in heroin addicts: a behavioral economic analysis. Addiction 93(3):321–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodefer JS, Carroll ME (1996) Progressive ratio and behavioral economic evaluation of the reinforcing efficacy of orally delivered phencyclidine and ethanol in monkeys: effects of feeding conditions. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 128(3):265–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahan TA, Bickel WK, Badger GJ, Giordano LA (2001) Sensitivity of nicotine-containing and de-nicotinized cigarette consumption to alternative non-drug reinforcement: a behavioral economic analysis. Behav Pharmacol 12(4):277–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Galuska T, Galuska CM, Winger G (2011) Effects of daily morphine administration and deprivation on choice and demand for remifentanil and cocaine in rhesus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 95(1):75–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Galuska T, Winger G, Woods JH (2007) A behavioral economic analysis of cocaine and remifentanil self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 194(4):563–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams KL, Woods JH (2000) A behavioral economic analysis of concurrent ethanol- and water-reinforced responding in different preference conditions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 24(7):980–986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Crystal Barnhouser, Eric Jackson, Nkiruka Emezienna, Janna Bonesteel, Jenna Cohen, and Curtis Bradley for data collection and management. This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) through R03 DA026523, R21 DA026967, R01 DA032363 and T32 DA07209.

Conflicts of interest

Both authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew W. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruner, N.R., Johnson, M.W. Demand curves for hypothetical cocaine in cocaine-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology 231, 889–897 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-013-3312-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-013-3312-5

Keywords

Navigation