Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 230, Issue 4, pp 631–638 | Cite as

Early markers of cognitive enhancement: developing an implicit measure of cognitive performance

  • Abbie PringleEmail author
  • Michael Browning
  • Elizabeth Parsons
  • Phil J. Cowen
  • Catherine J. Harmer
Original Investigation

Abstract

There is intense interest in the development of effective cognitive enhancing drugs which would have therapeutic application across a number of neurological and psychological disorders including dementia, schizophrenia and depression. However, development in this area has been limited by the absence of sensitive biomarkers which can be used to detect and refine therapeutic-like action in phase 1 clinical studies. The aim of the present study was therefore to develop a measure of cognition relevant to the action of candidate cognitive enhancers which might be sensitive to pharmacological manipulation in healthy volunteers. Healthy volunteers (n = 34) were randomised to receive a single dose of modafinil (100 mg) or placebo. Five hours post dose, attentional flexibility in learning was assessed using a novel implicit learning task. Volunteers also completed an auditory digit span task and visual analogue scales (VAS). Modafinil increased alertness as measured by the VAS. In the implicit learning task, modafinil enhanced learning rates in terms of both accuracy and reaction time, suggesting an increase in implicit rule learning. These results suggest that the novel learning task should be explored as a biomarker of early cognitive improvement which could be more sensitive than conventional measures.

Keywords

Cognitive enhancement Modafinil Set shifting 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

CJH has acted as a consultant for the following companies: Servier, GSK, Astra-Zeneca. Lundbeck and P1vital. She also holds shares in P1vital and is on the advisory board. PJC has been a paid member of advisory boards of Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Servier and Wyeth and has been a paid lecturer for Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, GlaxoSmithKline and Servier. He has received remuneration for scientific advice given to legal representatives of GlaxoSmithKline. AP, EP and MB report no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Baranski JV, Pigeau R, Dinich P, Jacobs I (2004) Effects of modafinil on cognitive and meta-cognitive performance. Human Psychopharmacology 19:323–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett JH, Robbins TW, Leeson VC, Sahakian BJ, Joyce EM, Blackwell AD (2010) Assessing cognitive function in clinical trials of schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34:1161–1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond A, Lader M (1974) The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleeremans A (2006) Conscious and unconscious cognition: a graded dynamic perspective. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
  6. Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ, Barrett P (1985) A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personal Individ Differ 6:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1996) Structured clinical interview for axis I and II DSM-IV disorders: patient edition (SCID-IV/P). Biometrics Research Department, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Galderisi S, Davidson M, Kahn RS, Mucci A, Boter H, Gheorghe MD, Rybakowski JK, Libiger J, Dollfus S, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Peuskens J, Hranov LG, Fleischhacker WW (2009) Correlates of cognitive impairment in first episode schizophrenia: the EUFEST study. Schizophr Res 115:104–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harmer C, Cowen P, Goodwin G (2011) Efficacy markers in depression. J Psychopharmacol (Oxford, England) 25:1148–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunter MD, Ganesan V, Wilkinson ID, Spence SA (2006) Impact of modafinil on prefrontal executive function in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 163:2184–2186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Husain M, Mehta MA (2011) Cognitive enhancement by drugs in health and disease. Trends Cogn Sci 15:28–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaufman SB, Deyoung CG, Gray JR, Jimenez L, Brown J, Mackintosh N (2010) Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition 116:321–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loose R, Kaufmann C, Tucha O, Auer DP, Lange KW (2006) Neural networks of response shifting: influence of task speed and stimulus material. Brain Res 1090:146–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacLeod CM, Mathews A, Tata P (1986) Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 95:15–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marchant NL, Kamel F, Echlin K, Grice J, Lewis M, Rusted JM (2009) Modafinil improves rapid shifts of attention. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 202:487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mehta MA, Owen AM, Sahakian BJ, Mavaddat N, Pickard JD, Robbins TW (2000) Methylphenidate enhances working memory by modulating discrete frontal and parietal lobe regions in the human brain. J Neurosci 20:RC65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Millan MJ, Agid Y, Brune M, Bullmore ET, Carter CS, Clayton NS, Connor R, Davis S, Deakin B, DeRubeis RJ, Dubois B, Geyer MA, Goodwin GM, Gorwood P, Jay TM, Joels M, Mansuy IM, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Murphy D, Rolls E, Saletu B, Spedding M, Sweeney J, Whittington M, Young LJ (2012) Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 11:141–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Minzenberg MJ, Carter CS (2008) Modafinil: a review of neurochemical actions and effects on cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1477–1502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Muller U, Rowe JB, Rittman T, Lewis C, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (2013) Effects of modafinil on non-verbal cognition, task enjoyment and creative thinking in healthy volunteers. Neuropharmacology 64:490–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murphy SE, Longhitano CL, Ayres RE, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ (2006) Tryptophan supplementation induces a positive bias in the processing of emotional material in healthy female volunteers. Psychopharmacology 187:121–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson HE (1982) National Adult Reading Test (NART): test manual. NFER-Nelson, WindsorGoogle Scholar
  22. Nosek BA, Hawkins CB, Frazier RS (2011) Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms. Trends Cogn Sci 15:152–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Randall DC, Shneerson JM, Plaha KK, File SE (2003) Modafinil affects mood, but not cognitive function, in healthy young volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol 18:163–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Randall DC, Fleck NL, Shneerson JM, File SE (2004) The cognitive-enhancing properties of modafinil are limited in non-sleep-deprived middle-aged volunteers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 77:547–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Randall DC, Shneerson JM, File SE (2005a) Cognitive effects of modafinil in student volunteers may depend on IQ. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 82:133–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Randall DC, Viswanath A, Bharania P, Elsabagh SM, Hartley DE, Shneerson JM, File SE (2005b) Does modafinil enhance cognitive performance in young volunteers who are not sleep-deprived? J Clin Psychopharmacol 25:175–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rasetti R, Mattay VS, Stankevich B, Skjei K, Blasi G, Sambataro F, Arrillaga-Romany IC, Goldberg TE, Callicot JH, Apud JA, Weinberger DR (2010) Modulatory effects of modafinil on neural circuits regulating emotion and cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:2101–2109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robbins TW, Arnsten AF (2009) The neuropsychopharmacology of fronto-executive function: monoaminergic modulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 32:267–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RD (1970) STAI manual. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  30. Stacy AW, Wiers RW (2010) Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 6:551–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sylvester CY, Wager TD, Lacey SC, Hernandez L, Nichols TE, Smith EE, Jonides J (2003) Switching attention and resolving interference: fMRI measures of executive functions. Neuropsychologia 41:357–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turner DC, Robbins TW, Clark L, Aron AR, Dowson J, Sahakian BJ (2003) Cognitive enhancing effects of modafinil in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 165:260–269Google Scholar
  33. Turner DC, Clark L, Dowson J, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (2004a) Modafinil improves cognition and response inhibition in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 55:1031–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turner DC, Clark L, Pomarol-Clotet E, McKenna P, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (2004b) Modafinil improves cognition and attentional set shifting in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1363–1373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. von Zerseen D, Strian F, Schwarz D (1974) Evaluation of depressive states, especially in longitudinal studies. In: Pichot B (ed) Psychological measurements in psychopharmacology. Karger, BaselGoogle Scholar
  36. Watson D, Clarke LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the positive and negative affect schedule scales. J Personal Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiers RW, Teachman BA, De Houwer J (2007) Implicit cognitive processes in psychopathology: an introduction. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 38:95–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abbie Pringle
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Michael Browning
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Parsons
    • 1
  • Phil J. Cowen
    • 1
  • Catherine J. Harmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.fMRIB CentreUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.Neurosciences Building, University Department of PsychiatryWarneford HospitalOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations