Simultaneous blockade of dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake promotes disadvantageous decision making in a rat gambling task
- 1.1k Downloads
The inability to make profitable long-term decisions has been implicated in several psychiatric disorders. There is emerging evidence to support a role for dopamine (DA) in decision making, but our understanding of the role of noradrenaline (NA) and serotonin (5-HT) in decision making, and of possible interactions between the three monoamines, is limited. Moreover, impulsivity has been associated with aberrant decision making, but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood.
The purpose of this study is to improve our understanding of the neuropharmacological mechanisms of decision making and impulse control.
We investigated the effects of amphetamine (0.25–1.0 mg/kg) and selective reuptake inhibitors of DA (GBR12909; 2.5–10 mg/kg), NA (atomoxetine; 0.3–3.0 mg/kg), and 5-HT (citalopram; 0.3–3.0 mg/kg) in a rat gambling task (rGT). Since the rGT allows for detection of impulsive action, i.e., premature responding, we also assessed the relationship between decision making and impulsivity.
In the rGT, rats developed an optimal choice strategy from the first session onwards. Elevation of endogenous DA or NA levels increased and decreased impulsivity, respectively, but did not alter decision making. However, simultaneous blockade of DA and NA disrupted decision making, reflected by a relative decrease in choice for the advantageous choice options. Increasing 5-HT neurotransmission did not affect decision making or impulsivity.
These data suggest important but complementary or redundant roles of DA and NA neurotransmission in decision-making processes based on reward probability and punishment. Moreover, impulse control and decision making in the rGT rely on dissociable mechanisms.
KeywordsDecision making Impulsivity Dopamine Serotonin Noradrenaline Rat gambling task
This study was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant R01 DA022628 (L.J.M.J.V.).
- Carli M, Robbins TW, Evenden JL, Everitt BJ (1983) Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats; implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal. Behav Brain Res 9:361–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fernando AB, Economidou D, Theobald DE, Zou MF, Newman AH, Spoelder M, Caprioli D, Moreno M, Hipόlito L, Aspinall AT, Robbins TW, Dalley JW (2012) Modulation of high impulsivity and attentional performance in rats by selective direct and indirect dopaminergic and noradrenergic receptor agonists. Psychopharmacology 219:341–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grant JE, Potenza MN (2007) Treatments for pathological gambling and other impulse control disorders. In: Nathan P, Gorman J (eds) A guide to treatments that work. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 561–579Google Scholar
- McDonald J (2009) Handbook of biological statistics, 2nd edn. Sparky House Publishing, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar